Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zuerner, R. L. Articles by Alt, D. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zuerner, R. L. Articles by Alt, D. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2009, p. 1202-1205, Vol. 47, No. 4
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01639-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Variable Nucleotide Tandem-Repeat Analysis Revealing a Unique Group of Leptospira interrogans Serovar Pomona Isolates Associated with California Sea Lions

Richard L. Zuerner^* and David P. Alt

Bacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, P.O. Box 70, Ames, Iowa 50010

Received 22 August 2008/ Returned for modification 24 November 2008/ Accepted 30 January 2009

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 
Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona isolates were compared by variable nucleotide tandem-repeat typing. Most cattle isolates grouped together, while isolates from pigs and wildlife were distributed across several groups. Significantly, California sea lion isolates formed a unique group, providing evidence that these animals are maintenance hosts of serovar Pomona.

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 
Pathogenic Leptospira bacteria cause leptospirosis, one of the most widespread zoonotic diseases known. The presence of Leptospira-infected wildlife and domesticated animals poses a persistent public health threat. Leptospira bacteria usually gain access to new hosts by passage across mucous membranes or through skin abrasions, often from environmental sources, such as urine-contaminated water. After septicemia, the bacteria localize in the kidneys and are released back into the environment during urination, thereby providing a source of infection of naïve animals (9). Leptospira infection leads to one of two outcomes; maintenance hosts infected by selected serovars develop chronic infections with few clinical signs, whereas accidental infection of nonmaintenance hosts often results in an acute infection that may result in death through multiple organ failure (9).

Leptospirosis due to L. interrogans serovar Pomona may not follow the maintenance host-accidental host paradigm. Animal populations of the same species can exhibit either chronic or acute infections with serovar Pomona. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of L. interrogans serovar Pomona isolates has revealed the presence of two major subtypes (5, 22) that can be further differentiated by HpaII digestion (2) or IS1500 hybridization (24) patterns. Specific clonal populations, rather than all members of serovar Pomona, may form stable associations with selected maintenance host species (2). To refine our understanding of serovar Pomona-host relationships, variable nucleotide tandem-repeat (VNTR) analysis was used to compare bacterial isolates obtained from different animal species. VNTR loci evolve independently and provide strong support for or against kinship among isolates.

L. interrogans strains (Table 1) were propagated in liquid EMJH medium at 29°C (8, 14). All of the strains (n = 63) included in this study, with the exception of L. interrogans serovar Copenhageni, were identified as L. interrogans serovar Pomona by RFLP analysis (22). Genomic DNA samples prepared as described previously (19) were used as templates for PCR amplification. All of the primers used, except P2447 (5'-CGGTTGCTTTAGGTGAAGCTGTCCAATG-3') and P2498 (5'-TCATTCTCTCTGCGGTCATAGGCATCCC-3'), were described previously (16, 18, 20, 21). P2447 and P2498 were designed and used to amplify a single product from VNTR locus 23 because published primers for this locus generated two products per template. PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized as described (Fig. 1) (24), and product sizes were calculated by comparison to size standards (100-bp ladder and 1-kb ladder; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) by using the linear regression function in Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. VNTR profiles of the L. interrogans strains analyzed in this study

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Comparison of VNTR products used to differentiate L. interrogans serovar Pomona isolates. The diversity of PCR products observed among L. interrogans serovar Pomona isolates is shown for VNTR loci 4 (panel A, lanes 1 to 7), 10 (panel B, lanes 1 to 4), 23 (panel C, lanes 1 to 3), 7 (panel D, lanes 1 and 2), and 31 (panel E, lanes 1 to 3). Products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized as described in the text. Migration of the corresponding products from L. interrogans serovar Copenhageni is shown for comparison (lane C in each panel). Panel A, products with 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, and 12 repeats (lanes 1 to 7). Panel B, products with 10, 11, 12, and 13 repeats (lanes 1 to 4). Panel C, products with 2, 3, and 4 repeats (lanes 1 to 3). Panel D, products with 1 and 2 repeats (lanes 1 and 2). Pane E, products with 2, 3, and 4 repeats (lanes 1 to 3). The migration of 100-bp size markers is shown at the right, with alternate size markers labeled.

PCR products for VNTR loci 4, 7, 10, 23, 27, 29, 30, 31, and 36 (16, 18, 20, 21) were assessed for all of the strains in this study. Published primers for the amplification of VNTR loci 9, 11, 19, and 50 failed to generate products from serovar Pomona DNA (data not shown) and were not used. The number of tandem repeats for each VNTR product was calculated from the predicted product length, less the length of unique sequence DNA, divided by the length of the repeating unit (Table 1). The number of tandem-repeat copies of representative PCR products at loci that varied among L. interrogans serovar Pomona isolates was confirmed by DNA sequence analysis as described previously (3). (Sequence data used in this study are available in GenBank under accession numbers EU938676 to EU938693.) Eight VNTR loci, 4, 7, 10, 23, 29, 30, 31, and 36, were used for comparison to L. interrogans serovar Copenhageni, which was used as an outgroup. VNTR loci 29, 30, and 36 were invariant among serovar Pomona isolates but were useful for distinguishing serovar Pomona from serovar Copenhageni. Serovar Pomona isolates varied at five VNTR loci, 4, 7, 10, 23, and 31 (Fig. 1). The kinship coefficient was calculated for each isolate based on VNTR data with Microsat version 1.5 (http://hpgl.stanford.edu/projects/microsat/) by using 6,435 bootstrap replications (the most allowed when using eight variables). The output was analyzed by neighbor joining using Neighbor in the PHYLIP software package (http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html), and the resulting dendrogram (Fig. 2) was drawn with TREEVIEW (17).

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Cluster analysis of L. interrogans serovar Pomona isolates by VNTR typing. Genetic relationships among serovar Pomona isolates are shown with L. interrogans serovar Copenhageni (Ic02001) used as the outgroup. A broken line is used to indicate the depth of the serovar Copenhageni branch. The host species from which each isolate was obtained is highlighted as indicated in the key provided. A reference marker for branch length (kinship coefficient, 0.1) is provided.

Eleven distinct groups of L. interrogans serovar Pomona isolates were detected by VNTR analysis and assigned a letter designation from A to K (Fig. 2). This method detected greater diversity between serovar Pomona isolates than did HpaII-generated RFLPs (which identified six distinct types) (2) but detected fewer differences than did an IS1500-based typing method (which detected 15 distinct types) (24). Most cattle isolates have either a common VNTR profile ([16/29 or 55%] in group K; Fig. 1) or a common HpaII-RFLP pattern (type 2) (2). In contrast, greater diversity among serovar Pomona isolates from pigs and wildlife was detected by VNTR analysis than by the HpaII-based method. The discriminative power of VNTR analysis and the ease with which results can be compared between laboratories suggest that this method will be suitable for standardization as a typing method for L. interrogans (16, 18, 20, 21).

A significant finding of this study was that all California sea lions isolates (n = 10) have common VNTR profiles, despite separation by time and geography, and are distinct from all other serovar Pomona isolates (group G, Fig. 1). California sea lion isolates are distinguished by the presence of 10 to 12 repeats at VNTR locus 4, compared to 3 to 7 repeats in all other isolates (Table 1). Isolate Po048, which is unique among California sea lion isolates at VNTR locus 4, was obtained in 1970 during the earliest reported leptospirosis outbreak along the California coast (23); other isolates obtained during subsequent outbreaks (1, 4, 13) were identical to each other. California sea lions are persistently exposed to serovar Pomona during nonoutbreak years (15). Intermittent exposure of California sea lions to the same L. interrogans serovar Pomona clonal population from another host species through accidental exposure over a 37-year period is unlikely (1, 4, 6, 7, 10-13, 23). We conclude that California sea lions are maintenance hosts of L. interrogans serovar Pomona. Persistent Leptospira infection of California sea lions is a potential public health threat; infected animals migrate and become stranded on beaches along the Pacific coast of North America (25) and may transmit disease to humans, pets, and wildlife. Identification of a unique marker (VNTR locus 4) associated with serovar Pomona isolates from California sea lion isolates should be useful for detecting marine mammal-terrestrial mammal disease transmission.

 
We thank C. Armstrong, G. Songer, D. Miller, M. Wilson, J. Prescott, C. Kirkbride, F. White, L. Hanson, B. Kingscote, R. Higgins, S. Reidemann, H. Hill, and P. Donahue for providing strains; Richard Hornsby, Darrell Bayles, Betsy Bricker, Caroline Cameron, Tracey Goldstein, Denise Greig, Frances Gulland, Peter Olesiuk, Wendy Szaniszlo, and Liz Wheeler for assistance with sample collection and analysis; and Ami Frank for technical assistance.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Bacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, P.O. Box 70, Ames, IA 50010. Phone: (515) 663-7392. Fax: (515) 663-7458. E-mail: Richard.Zuerner{at}ars.usda.gov

Published ahead of print on 9 February 2009.

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 

1
1. Acevedo-Whitehouse, K., H. de la Cueva, F. M. Gulland, D. Aurioles-Gamboa, F. Arellano-Carbajal, and F. Suarez-Guemes. 2003. Evidence of Leptospira interrogans infection in California sea lion pups from the Gulf of California. J. Wildl. Dis. 39:145-151.[Abstract]
2
2. Bolin, C. A., and R. L. Zuerner. 1996. Correlation between DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms in Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona type kennewicki and host animal source. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:424-425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Bulach, D. M., R. L. Zuerner, P. Wilson, T. Seemann, A. McGrath, P. A. Cullen, J. Davis, M. Johnson, E. Kuczek, D. P. Alt, B. Peterson-Burch, R. L. Coppel, J. I. Rood, J. K. Davies, and B. Adler. 2006. Genome reduction in Leptospira borgpetersenii reflects limited transmission potential. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:14560-14565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Cameron, C. E., R. L. Zuerner, S. Raverty, K. M. Colegrove, S. A. Norman, D. M. Lambourn, S. J. Jeffries, and F. M. Gulland. 2008. Detection of pathogenic Leptospira bacteria in pinniped populations via PCR and identification of a source of transmission for zoonotic leptospirosis in the marine environment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:1728-1733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Ciceroni, L., S. Ciarrochhi, A. Ciervo, A. Petrucca, A. Pinot, A. Calderaro, I. Viani, L. Galati, G. Dettori, and C. Chezzi. 2002. Differentiation of leptospires of the serogroup Pomona by monoclonal antibodies, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction. Res. Microbiol. 153:37-44.[Medline]
6
6. Colagross-Schouten, A. M., J. A. Mazet, F. M. Gulland, M. A. Miller, and S. Hietala. 2002. Diagnosis and seroprevalence of leptospirosis in California sea lions from coastal California. J. Wildl. Dis. 38:7-17.[Abstract]
7
7. Dierauf, L. A., D. J. Vandenbroek, J. Roletto, M. Koski, L. Amaya, and L. J. Gage. 1985. An epizootic of leptospirosis in California sea lions. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 187:1145-1148.[Medline]
8
8. Ellinghausen, H. C., Jr., and W. G. McCullough. 1965. Nutrition of Leptospira Pomona and growth of 13 other serotypes: fractionation of oleic albumin complex and a medium of bovine albumin and polysorbate 80. Am. J. Vet. Res. 26:45-51.[Medline]
9
9. Faine, S., B. Adler, C. Bolin, and P. Perolat. 1999. Leptospira and leptospirosis, 2nd ed. MediSci, Melbourne, Australia.
10
10. Gerber, J. A., J. Roletto, L. E. Morgan, D. M. Smith, and L. J. Gage. 1993. Findings in pinnipeds stranded along the central and northern California coast, 1984-1990. J. Wildl. Dis. 29:423-433.[Abstract]
11
11. Gilmartin, W. G., R. L. Delong, A. W. Smith, J. C. Sweeney, B. W. De Lappe, R. W. Risebrough, L. A. Griner, M. D. Dailey, and D. B. Peakall. 1976. Premature parturition in the California sea lion. J. Wildl. Dis. 12:104-115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. Greig, D. J., F. M. D. Gulland, and C. Kreuder. 2005. A decade of live California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) strandings along the central California coast: causes and trends, 1991-2000. Aquat. Mamm. 31:11-22.[CrossRef]
13
13. Gulland, F. M., M. Koski, L. J. Lowenstine, A. Colagross, L. Morgan, and T. Spraker. 1996. Leptospirosis in California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) stranded along the central California coast, 1981-1994. J. Wildl. Dis. 32:572-580.[Abstract]
14
14. Johnson, R. C., and V. G. Harris. 1967. Differentiation of pathogenic and saprophytic leptospires. I. Growth at low temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 94:27-31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Lloyd-Smith, J. O., D. J. Greig, S. Hietala, G. S. Ghneim, L. Palmer, J. St Leger, B. T. Grenfell, and F. M. Gulland. 2007. Cyclical changes in seroprevalence of leptospirosis in California sea lions: endemic and epidemic disease in one host species? BMC Infect. Dis. 7:125.[CrossRef][Medline]
16
16. Majed, Z., E. Bellenger, D. Postic, C. Pourcel, G. Baranton, and M. Picardeau. 2005. Identification of variable-number tandem-repeat loci in Leptospira interrogans sensu stricto. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:539-545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Page, R. D. M. 1996. TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biol. Sci. 12:357-358.[Free Full Text]
18
18. Salaün, L., F. Merien, S. Gurianova, G. Baranton, and M. Picardeau. 2006. Application of multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for molecular typing of the agent of leptospirosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:3954-3962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
19. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
20
20. Slack, A., M. Symonds, M. Dohnt, and L. Smythe. 2006. An improved multiple-locus variable number of tandem repeats analysis for Leptospira interrogans serovar Australis: a comparison with fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis and its use to redefine the molecular epidemiology of this serovar in Queensland, Australia. J. Med. Microbiol. 55:1549-1557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21
21. Slack, A. T., M. F. Dohnt, M. L. Symonds, and L. D. Smythe. 2005. Development of a multiple-locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) for Leptospira interrogans and its application to Leptospira interrogans serovar Australis isolates from Far North Queensland, Australia. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 4:10.[CrossRef][Medline]
22
22. Thiermann, A. B., A. L. Handsaker, S. L. Moseley, and B. Kingscote. 1985. New method for classification of leptospiral isolates belonging to serogroup Pomona by restriction endonuclease analysis: serovar kennewicki. J. Clin. Microbiol. 21:585-587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23
23. Vedros, N. A., A. W. Smith, J. Schonewald, G. Migaki, and R. C. Hubbard. 1971. Leptospirosis epizootic among California sea lions. Science 172:1250-1251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24
24. Zuerner, R. L., and C. A. Bolin. 1997. Differentiation of Leptospira interrogans isolates by IS1500 hybridization and PCR assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2612-2617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25
25. Zuerner, R. L., C. E. Cameron, S. Raverty, J. Robinson, K. M. Colegrove, S. A. Norman, D. M. Lambourn, S. J. Jeffries, D. P. Alt, and F. M. Gulland. 25 December 2008. Geographical dissemination of Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona during seasonal migration of California sea lions. Vet. Microbiol. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.12.017.

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2009, p. 1202-1205, Vol. 47, No. 4
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01639-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zuerner, R. L. Articles by Alt, D. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zuerner, R. L. Articles by Alt, D. P.