Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2009, p. 1596-1598, Vol. 47, No. 5
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01912-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| CASE REPORT |

Research & Development Department, Vissum Corporation, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante,1 Mycology Laboratory, School of Medicine,2 Ophthalmology Division, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain,5 Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina,3 IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain,4 CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands6
Received 3 October 2008/ Returned for modification 4 December 2008/ Accepted 2 March 2009
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (69K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A) Clinical picture of the left eye showing conjunctival hyperemia, peripheral corneal pannus, corneal edema, and a central ulcer with white infiltrates. (B) Calcofluor white staining of a corneal biopsy sample showing fungi invading the cornea. Original magnification, x400.
|
For identification, the fungus was subcultured on malt extract agar (Pronadisa, Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain) and oatmeal agar (30 g oat flakes, 1 g MgSO4, 1.5 g KH2PO4, 15 g agar, 1 liter tap water) and incubated at 20°C in the dark. After 1 week of incubation, pycnidia typical of the coelomycetous genus Pyrenochaeta developed in all of the media tested but the microscopic features observed in the case strain did not match those of the current accepted species of the genus. Therefore, the isolate was sent to the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS) in The Netherlands for final identification. The fungus was identified as a new Pyrenochaeta species (accession number CBS 121759), which was confirmed by analysis of the ITS sequence of the clinical strain. The sequence (532 bp) (GenBank accession number EU885415), compared with different sequences obtained from the CBS by the ClustalW2 program, showed the highest homology with two strains morphologically identified as P. unguis-hominis, 100% with CBS 123295 and 96% with CBS 378.92, differing from the later at 15 bp positions.
The pycnidia were olivaceous brown to almost black and globose or flask shaped, measuring 100 to 400 µm in diameter, with 1 to 3 ostioles, and with several setae positioned near the ostiole (Fig. 2A and B). The pycnidial wall was of textura angularis with dark brown intercellular material (Fig. 2D). The conidiophores, which emerged from all over the inner surface of the pycnidial wall, were branched at the base, bearing terminal and lateral conidiogenous cells. The conidiogenous cells were phialidic, mostly cylindrical, and 12 to 18 µm long by 2 to 3.5 µm wide (Fig. 2C). The conidia were whitish in mass, ellipsoidal, 2 to 4 µm long by 1 to 2 µm wide, straight or slightly curved, hyaline, and smooth walled (Fig. 2E).
![]() View larger version (171K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Light microscopic images of Pyrenochaeta sp. (accession no. CBS 121759) on oatmeal agar at 20°C. (A and B) Pycnidia with setae (arrows). Scale bar = 50 µm. (C) Transverse view of the pycnidial wall with conidiophores and conidiogenous cells. Scale bar = 10 µm. (D) Surface view of the conidiomatal wall with dark intercellular material. Scale bar = 10 µm. (E) Conidia from pycnidia. Scale bar = 5 µm.
|
The identification of these kinds of fungi is often not easy because they are not part of the spectrum of fungi regularly encountered in clinical samples. The proper diagnosis and identification of the causal agent are crucial for starting adequate treatment and avoiding devastating ocular consequences. In some cases, molecular biology techniques have helped to identify the causal agent (5), but in others, like the one presented here, expert mycologists need to be involved to reach a correct identification. In this case, a very rare fungus was identified as responsible for the infection and must be added to the list of species that can produce keratomycosis. It shows typical features of the genus Pyrenochaeta, but none of the accepted species have all of the morphological features observed in this case strain. The color and texture of the colony help to identify the species of the genus (2). The anamorphic genus Pyrenochaeta belongs to the group Coelomycetes and is related to Herpotrichia and Leptosphaeria, two ascomycetous genera of the family Leptosphaeriaceae. Pyrenochaeta contains two species that cause infection in humans, i.e., Pyrenochaeta romeroi isolated from cases of black-grain mycetoma (1, 9) and Pyrenochaeta unguis-hominis isolated from infected nails on several occasions, although its role in the development of onychomycosis remains questionable (4). Other species of Pyrenochaeta are pathogens of various plant species. Identification of the fungi responsible for an infection to the genus or species level is hampered by their frequent failure to produce characteristic diagnostic structures in culture and the lack of reference sequences in the public databases. In addition, some of these sequences correspond to species erroneously identified (3). In particular, the sequences of Pyrenochaeta species obtained in the GenBank database when we ran the BLAST program (March 2007) did not match ours. Since new sequences have been added to the GenBank database since that date, a new BLAST performed later allowed us to identify our fungus as a probable novel species of Pyrenochaeta. Apart from P. unguis-hominis, mentioned above, another close species of Pyrenochaeta was P. nobilis (CBS 407.76), the type species of the genus Pyrenochaeta, which showed 92% homology in the ITS region and differed at more than 35 bp positions. The other strain (CBS 123295), isolated from a Dutch patient with a recurrent nail infection and identified at the CBS as P. unguis-hominis on the basis of the morphological characteristics of its fruit bodies, was also sequenced and proved to have an ITS sequence that is 100% homologous to that of our strain. This strain was reexamined morphologically and found to be very similar to the case strain. To our knowledge, the Dutch strain is the only other isolate of this new Pyrenochaeta species. The natural habitat of this fungus is unclear.
On the basis of the above-mentioned morphological and molecular studies, we believe that the strain responsible for the infection of our patient is a species of Pyrenochaeta not previously described. We are currently preparing the formal proposal of a new species of this fungus.
We have no proprietary interest in any of the materials described in this article.
Published ahead of print on 18 March 2009. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»