Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2009, p. 1965-1968, Vol. 47, No. 6
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00352-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| CASE REPORT |

Jose M. Gonzalez-Berjon,
Patricia L. Cernoch,
Randall J. Olsen, and
James M. Musser*
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
Received 16 February 2009/ Returned for modification 6 March 2009/ Accepted 16 April 2009
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (76K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A and B) Anterior-posterior and lateral chest X rays, demonstrating enlarged cardiac silhouette and mild left lower lobe infiltrates. (C) Computed tomography scan, showing pericardial effusion with bilateral mild pleural effusion and left lower lobe pneumonia. (D) Two-dimensional echocardiogram (apical, view of left chambers), showing pericardial effusion. (E) Fibrinoid pericarditis with chronic inflammation was identified in tissue sections from the pericardium (hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification, x10). (F) Lymphocytes and hemosiderin-laden histiocytes were identified in the pericardial effusion cytospin preparations (Papanicolaou stain; original magnification, x60).
|
Further evaluation included a detailed radiology study of the chest and abdomen that showed a moderate right and a small left pleural effusion, with atelectasis in the bilateral lower lobes and a moderate pericardial effusion (Fig. 1C). An electrocardiogram revealed sinus tachycardia and low voltage on the precordial leads. A subsequent two-dimensional echocardiogram confirmed the large circumferential pericardial effusion, with right ventricular diastolic and right atrial systolic collapse (Fig. 1D). The patient was started on methylprednisolone before receiving a pericardial window, based on a diagnosis of pericardial effusion with tamponade. Approximately 800 ml of bloody pericardial fluid was evacuated. The fluid was sent to pathology for Gram and acid-fast bacteria staining and anaerobic, aerobic, fungus, Mycoplasma, and Nocardia culturing. Histopathological examination of the pericardial fluid (Fig. 1E and F) showed small lymphocytes, acute inflammatory cells, mesothelial cells, and hemosiderin-laden histiocytes. No malignant cells were seen. All microbiology stains and cultures performed in our laboratory were negative. Mycoplasma testing (performed at the ARUP National Reference Laboratory) by the Mycofast US (ELITech France SAS, France) culture method was also negative. Growth of Ureaplasma spp. was detected on A8 agar after 48 hours of incubation at 37°C in an atmosphere enriched with 7.5% CO2. Ureaplasma spp. were distinguished from Mycoplasma hominis on the A8 agar based on their round granular colony morphology. Bacterial colonies were not quantified. The isolate was not available for molecular testing, so species identification to discriminate Ureaplasma urealyticum from Ureaplasma parvum was not possible.
The patient had significant clinical improvement following placement of the pericardial window. When the Ureaplasma sp. was reported on admission day 7, the patient was stable, with mild clinical improvement, but her neutrophil count remained elevated (85%). Immediately after the identification of the Ureaplasma sp., she was switched to doxycycline (100 mg every 12 h orally) from the 2-day postoperative empirical antibacterial therapy that consisted of ceftriaxone (1 g IV), azithromycin (500 mg IV), and vancomycin (1 g IV). Her clinical status and neurologic state returned to baseline 2 days later. Since Ureaplasma spp. are generally susceptible to azithromycin and doxycycline, it was unclear whether the antibiotic change played a significant role in her recovery following placement of the pericardial window. She was discharged on day 18, with resolution of the neutrophilia (hemoglobin, 10.9 g/dl [normal reference range, 12 to 16 g/dl]; hematocrit, 34.8% [37 to 47%]; mean corpuscular volume, 98.3 fl [82 to 100 fl]; and leukocyte count, 8.86 x 103 cells/µl [4.5 x 103 to 11 x 103 cells/µl], with 62% neutrophils [39 to 69%]). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.
Discussion. This patient's pericardial effusion was diagnosed only after the imaging studies were performed, following an initial evaluation for dyspnea. Although clinical signs of cardiac tamponade developed while she was in the hospital, the clinical picture upon admission was atypical community-acquired pneumonia with anemia and altered mental status. The possibility of congestive heart failure was thought to be low, especially considering the normal level of serum beta-natriuretic peptide. The identification of the Ureaplasma sp. in the pericardial fluid was an unanticipated but significant finding. The underlying clinical concern was an atypical pneumonia with anemia of chronic disease and secondary pericardial effusion. In this clinical context, Mycoplasma pneumoniae is among the most common pathogens (17), but it has rarely been associated with pericarditis (7). Likewise, bacterial pericarditis following pneumonia due to Streptococcus pneumoniae has been infrequently reported. Ureaplasma infection was not suspected. Waites et al. have postulated that expression of homologous virulence factors such as adhesins and immunoglobulin A proteases that are expressed by Ureaplasma spp. may contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of invasive infection, but well-controlled animal studies have yet to fully establish their contribution to disease (16).
Ureaplasma spp. are weak pathogens that are frequently found in the urogenital tract of healthy asymptomatic adults. However, as demonstrated by the case presented herein, these organisms may occasionally cause severe invasive disease. Ureaplasma spp. are well-known agents of nongonococcal urethritis, postpartum fever/abortion, chorioamnionitis, and neonatal sepsis (16). Infection with Ureaplasma spp. in anatomical sites outside the urogenital tract is extremely rare in the adult population (Table 1) (6, 8, 9, 12, 13). Notably, published cases include infection of the pleura and meninges. Each of these patients had well-defined predisposing conditions and a plausible source of infectious inoculation (Table 1). Although several cases of postoperative mediastinitis with pericarditis and one case of posttransplant pericarditis have also been described (Table 1) (8, 11, 12, 13), no cases of spontaneous pericarditis have been previously reported with this pathogen. Even though the patient reported herein has several immunosuppressing conditions that may have contributed to infection susceptibility, she had no recent history of surgery or instrumentation that would have introduced the pathogen into her thorax or vascular system. As such, the exact etiology of her pericardial effusion remains uncertain. She may have had a primary Ureaplasma pneumonia, with direct extension into the pericardial space. Alternatively, she may have had a urinary tract infection with intermittent hematogenous dissemination of Ureaplasma sp., resulting in a purulent pericardial effusion and secondary pneumonia. Because the Ureaplasma sp. was isolated only from the pericardial fluid, it is impossible to determine the primary source of infection. Either scenario is feasible, given a recent history of cloudy urine and cough. Regardless of the source, the occurrence of this pathogen in her pericardial space resulted in a life-threatening infection. Experience in treating invasive Ureaplasma infections is limited. We suggest that that a prompt detection of invasive Ureaplasma infections is crucial for directing appropriate antibiotic coverage and achieving an optimal clinical outcome. As such, this case demonstrates that difficult identification and infrequent occurrence may cause invasive Ureaplasma infections to be overlooked by physicians and laboratory personnel. A heightened clinical suspicion is necessary when routine culture and histopathology findings do not readily isolate an organism or when the patient does not respond to empirical antibiotic and anti-inflammatory treatments.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Review of published cases of invasive Ureaplasma infection
|
103 color-changing units yielded PCR sensitivities that ranged from 0 to 86%, whereas those with >103 color-changing units produced PCR sensitivities ranging from 97 to 100%. PCR also enables isolate identification to the species level using the newly derived serovar classification system. Although some evidence suggests that U. urealyticum is more pathogenic than U. parvum, the clinical/pathological significance of this new nomenclature remains uncertain. In addition, turnaround times for in-house PCR testing are reduced to 24 to 48 h from the 2- to 5-day expected turnaround time for culture (1, 5). Importantly, Cheah et al. demonstrated a 96% agreement between the Mycoplasma Duo test and PCR for Ureaplasma detection in endotracheal aspirates from 68 premature infants (3). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Methods used to detect Ureaplasma spp.
|
Concluding comment. This case is remarkable for the following three reasons. (i) A Ureaplasma sp. has not been reported previously as a cause of spontaneous bacterial pericardial effusion. (ii) Mycoplasma spp. and Ureaplasma spp. must be included on the differential diagnosis of primary pericardial effusion and other invasive infections, or it may be easily missed. (iii) Though they are valuable tools to supplement conventional culture in the clinical laboratory, rapid diagnostic techniques still may not allow Ureaplasma spp. to be diagnosed.
Published ahead of print on 22 April 2009. ![]()
Both authors contributed equally. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»