Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hare, K. M. Articles by Leach, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hare, K. M. Articles by Leach, A. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2009, p. 1981-1982, Vol. 47, No. 6
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00046-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

"Dodgy 6As": Differentiating Pneumococcal Serotype 6C from 6A by Use of the Quellung Reaction

Top LETTER REFERENCES

 
The Quellung reaction has long been the standard method for pneumococcal serotyping (7); however, the new serotype 6C is reportedly indistinguishable from serotype 6A using this method (8). We report an anomalous Quellung reaction associated with serotype 6C, which may aid in diagnostic interpretation.

The 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine was introduced in Australia for indigenous and other high-risk infants in 2001. In 2002, a serotyping anomaly was noted in a subset of carriage isolates. These isolates appeared negative for all nine pool antisera A to I (covering 90 pneumococcal serotypes) but reacted positively with Omni serum. Following advice from the Pneumococcal Reference Laboratory in Queensland, Australia, we found that these isolates reacted strongly with group 6 antiserum but that factor reactions were weak. Group 6 is included in the B pool. A selection of isolates was sent to Queensland and serotyped as 6A. In 2003, the Statens Serum Institute (SSI) confirmed 10 such isolates as 6A; pool B reactions were mostly weak (+), while pool Q reactions were strongly positive (+++). (Pool Q, which includes group 6, is part of an alternative set of antisera used to identify types present in the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine.) To distinguish "normal" 6As with strong pool B reactions, we referred to isolates with weak or apparent negative pool B reactions as "dodgy" 6As.

In 2007, when the new serotype 6C was announced (8), we queried whether our dodgy 6As were actually 6Cs. Using a wciN PCR (9), we revealed that 1 of 20 prevaccine isolates recorded as 6A was 6C, while 17 of 18 postvaccine isolates recorded as 6A were 6C, suggesting serotype replacement. All 17 postvaccine serotype 6C isolates had been recorded as dodgy 6As, while the one postvaccine serotype 6A isolate was recorded as a normal 6A. Atypical reactions had not been recorded prevaccine.

To confirm our results, fresh serum broths were prepared and serotyped blinded. All 20 isolates typed as 6A by PCR were normal 6As by the Quellung reaction, while all 18 isolates typed as 6C by PCR were dodgy 6As by the Quellung reaction. Subsequently, another 144 6A isolates from a 2003 to 2005 surveillance study were tested using wciN PCR. All 61 normal 6As were confirmed as 6A, while all 83 dodgy 6As were 6Cs. We have therefore matched PCR results to pool B reactions for 182 isolates previously recorded as 6A (81 [100%] normal 6A isolates were confirmed as serotype 6A by PCR and 101 [100%] dodgy 6A isolates were determined to be 6C by PCR).

We have used five different batches of pool B antiserum since 2002; thus, batch variation is unlikely to have influenced our findings. Furthermore, in a competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, 6C polysaccharide antigen did not significantly attenuate the binding of pool B to 6A and 6B polysaccharide antigens. This suggests that pool B may react weakly with serotype 6C. Interestingly, 6C antigen considerably inhibited the binding of pool Q to these antigens, suggesting a strong pool Q reaction with 6C (as reported by SSI).

The Quellung reaction is produced using the Neufeld test, described by Lund (6) and Austrian (1), and the SSI pneumococcal antisera insert (August 2001 revision). Briefly, a drop of specimen is mixed with a drop of typing serum, a coverslip is placed over the mixture, and the preparation is examined using a x100 magnification oil immersion lens. A positive reaction occurs when type-specific antibody binds to the pneumococcal capsule, causing a change in its refractive index so that it appears "swollen" and more visible. A World Health Organization working group acknowledged the Quellung reaction as the standard method for serotyping pneumococcal isolates but did not detail a recommended method (7).

Recently, 11 reference laboratories in Europe participated in the validation of pneumococcal serotyping (5). A high degree of consensus was found between the Neufeld test and other serotyping methods (agglutination or gel diffusion). Six laboratories used the Neufeld test; however, the magnification used was not specified, nor was the use of oil immersion (5). Australian laboratories routinely use x40 magnification (4), which is quicker and simpler than x100. This protocol is accurate and reliable and has been used by experts for more than 30 years (2). According to Henrichsen (3), the Quellung reaction continues to be carried out essentially as described by Austrian, and we find no reference to any modified Neufeld method used outside Australia.

To our eyes, the differing strengths of the pool B reaction with 6A and 6C were clearly visible at both magnifications (Fig. 1). Furthermore, this phenomenon is not confined to pool B antiserum. We have observed that a strong positive pool G reaction indicates serotype 29 or 35B, while a weak positive pool G reaction invariably indicates serotype 34.

View larger version (40K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Quellung reaction photographed using a x100 magnification oil-immersion lens, giving an appearance similar to that seen at x40 magnification. (a) 6A pool B reaction (normal); (b) 6C pool B reaction (dodgy); (c) 6C negative control (no antiserum added).

We have demonstrated that pneumococcal serotype 6C is associated with a weak pool B reaction which differentiates it from 6A. This information should prove useful for laboratories that use the Quellung reaction, particularly those without the capability for molecular typing.

 
We thank Denise Murphy (Pneumococcal Reference Laboratory, Queensland Health Scientific Services, Australia) and Mette Barendorff Kerrn (Statens Serum Institute, Denmark) for serotyping advice and Peter Christensen (Menzies School of Health Research, Australia) for laboratory assistance.

This study was supported by an NHMRC project grant and NIH grant AI-31473 (M.H.N.).

M.H.N. and I.H.P. are employed by the University of Alabama at Birmingham, which has applied for a patent covering the discovery of serotype 6C.

 
Published ahead of print on 8 April 2009.

Top LETTER REFERENCES

 

1
1. Austrian, R. 1976. The Quellung reaction, a neglected microbiologic technique. Mt. Sinai J. Med. 43:699-709.[Medline]
2
2. Hansman, D. 1983. Serotypes in pneumococcal disease. A ten year study in Australia 1970 through 1979. Aust. N. Z. J. Med. 13:359-364.[Medline]
3
3. Henrichsen, J. 1999. Typing of Streptococcus pneumoniae: past, present and future. Am. J. Med. 107:50S-54S.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
4. Kong, F., and G. L. Gilbert. 2003. Using cpsA-cpsB sequence polymorphisms and serotype-/group-specific PCR to predict 51 Streptococcus pneumoniae capsular serotypes. J. Med. Microbiol. 52:1047-1058.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Konradsen, H. B. 2005. Validation of serotyping of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Europe. Vaccine 23:1368-1373.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. Lund, E. 1960. Laboratory diagnosis of Pneumococcus infections. Bull. W. H. O. 23:5-13.[Medline]
7
7. O'Brien, K. L., H. Nohynek, and the W. H. O. Pneumococcal Vaccine Trials Carriage Working Group. 2003. Report from a W. H. O. working group: standard method for detecting upper respiratory carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 22:e1-e11.[Medline]
8
8. Park, I. H., D. G. Pritchard, R. Cartee, A. Brandao, M. C. Brandileone, and M. H. Nahm. 2007. Discovery of a new capsular serotype (6C) within serogroup 6 of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:1225-1233.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Park, I. H., S. Park, S. K. Hollingshead, and M. H. Nahm. 2007. Genetic basis for the new pneumococcal serotype, 6C. Infect. Immun. 75:4482-4489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

						Kim M. Hare* Heidi Smith-Vaughan Michael Binks Menzies School of Health Research Institute of Advanced Studies Charles Darwin University Darwin, Australia In Ho Park Moon H. Nahm Departments of Pathology and Microbiology University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama Amanda J. Leach Menzies School of Health Research Institute of Advanced Studies Charles Darwin University Darwin, Australia
						* Phone: 61-889228828, Fax: 61-889275187, E-mail: Kim.Hare{at}menzies.edu.au

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2009, p. 1981-1982, Vol. 47, No. 6
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00046-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hare, K. M. Articles by Leach, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hare, K. M. Articles by Leach, A. J.