Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2009, p. 2442-2451, Vol. 47, No. 8
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00566-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Department of Microbiology and Immunology,1 Department of Pathology and Sealy Center for Vaccine Development, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1070,2 Departamento de Microbioloxía e Parasitoloxía, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Spain 27002,3 Programa de Microbiología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile,4 Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia, e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil5
Received 19 March 2009/ Returned for modification 7 May 2009/ Accepted 22 May 2009
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
, β,
, and
(1, 2). Subsequent studies have proposed that additional intimin types exist, and based on differences at the nucleotide level, they have been classified as intimins
,
,
,
, and
, etc. (3, 4, 13, 18, 29, 41). While the correlation between the expression of some of the intimin types and the tissue tropism of different E. coli strains has been demonstrated experimentally using in vitro human intestinal organ cultures (6, 10, 11, 25), very little is known about other E. coli O157:H7 colonization factors, including those controlling the expression of fimbriae. EHEC O157:H7 contains two nonidentical lpf loci homologous to the long polar fimbriae (LPF) of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (33, 34). Expression of E. coli O157:H7 lpf operon 1 (lpf1) in E. coli K-12 has been associated with increased adherence to tissue-cultured cells and with the appearance of long fimbriae (33, 38). The lpf2 operon has also been linked to adherence to epithelial cells (34), and its expression in other pathogenic E. coli strains is believed to be important for the development of severe diarrhea (8, 23). E. coli O157:H7 strains harboring mutations in one or both of the lpf loci have diminished colonization abilities in animal models (swine and sheep) (12) and also display an altered human intestinal tissue tropism (9). Furthermore, the role of LPF as a colonization factor associated with persistence in the intestine was elucidated using a lamb model of infection (37). Recently, we established the connection between regulatory proteins and expression of the lpf1 loci in response to environmental cues, and we found that these fimbriae are regulated by H-NS, a protein that binds to the regulatory sequence of lpfA1 and "silences" transcription, while the LEE-encoded Ler regulator binds to the regulatory sequence and inhibits the action of H-NS (36). Further, we found that deregulation of the lpf1 operon produced constitutive expression of the fimbriae, a phenotype associated with adherence and hemagglutination phenotypes in E. coli O157:H7 (38).
Because our data indicated that LPF constitute an important colonization factor of EHEC O157:H7 strains and because cumulative evidence indicates that homologues to the lpf genes are found in other pathogenic E. coli and Salmonella strains (7, 8, 28, 31, 34), in the current study, we identified several polymorphisms within the lpfA genes, which were used to classify the major fimbrial subunit genes into distinct variants. Further, we showed that lpf genes, in combination with the different intimin types, are reliable markers for the differentiation of E. coli O157:H7 and other pathogenic E. coli strains.
|
|
|---|
Recombinant DNA techniques. Standard methods were used to perform genomic DNA isolation, PCR, and gel electrophoresis (27). Recombinant Taq polymerase enzyme (1 U) was used in combination with 2 mM MgCl2 and 1 µM oligonucleotide primer in each reaction. All amplifications began with a 5-min hot start at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s in a range of 52°C to 72°C (depending on the lpfA variant amplified), and extension at 72°C for 30 s. In some cases, PCRs were performed with boiled bacterial colonies. On the basis of multiple sequence alignments, the polymorphic regions in the lpfA genes were chosen (see below), and PCR primers were derived from those regions with the help of OLIGO primer analysis software. All oligonucleotide primers are listed in Table 1.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. PCR primer pairs for the amplification of the different lpfA types
|
LpfA1 protein NCBI GenBank accession numbers for E. coli serotype O157:H7 strains are as follows: for EDL933, AAG58695; for EC4115, ACI36002; for Sakai, BAB37854. For other E. coli serotypes (with strains given in parentheses), LpfA1 protein accession numbers are as follows: for O55:H7 (DEC5A), BAE48422; for ONT:H26 (ECOR42), BAE48423; for O119:NM (O119-53), BAE48424; for O127:H6 (E2348/69), CAS11346; for O8 (IAI1), CAR00508; for O26:H11, BAD69589; for O81 (ED1a), CAR10220; for O4:H43 (ECOR67), BAE48419; for O111:H21 (DEC15A), BAE48418; for O111:H8 (DEC8B), BAE48417; for O104:NM (ECOR28), BAE48416; for O86:H43 (ECOR23), BAE48415; for O128:H2 (DEC11A), BAE48420; for ONT:H10 (ECOR65), BAE48421; for rabbit EPEC (REPEC) O15:H– (83/39), AAO22843; for enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) (55989), CAV00478. For Salmonella enterica strains, LpfA1 protein accession numbers are as follows: for Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis P125109, CAR35040; for Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin CT02021853, ACH74212; for Salmonella enterica serovar Newport SL254, ACF63868; for Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg SL476, ACF70317; for Salmonella serovar Typhimurium LT2, AAL22500.
LpfA2 protein accession numbers for E. coli serotype O157:H7 strains are as follows: for EDL933, AAG58930; for EC4115, ACI39341; for Sakai, BAB38093. For other E. coli serotypes (with strains given in parentheses), LpfA2 protein accession numbers are as follows: for O55:H7 (DEC5A), BAE48400; for O119:NM (O119-53), BAE48402; for ONT:H26 (ECOR42), BAE48401; for O113:H21 (EH41), AAL18161; for O152:H28 (SE11), BAG79542; for O78 (789), AAY18076; for O78:H9 (chi7122), AAS99229; for O13:H21 (ECOR30), BAE48408; for O7:H21 (ECOR33), BAE48407; for O26:H11 (DEC10A), BAE48410; for O111:H8 (DEC8B), BAE48409; for O86:H43 (ECOR23), BAE48406; for O157:H43 (DEC7A), BAE48405; for O104::NM (ECOR28), BAE48404; for O85:HNT (ECOR7), BAE48403; for ONT:HNT (ECOR48), BAE48413; for O1:H6 (ECOR46), BAE48412; for O7:NM (ECOR40), BAE48411; for O79:H25 (ECOR36), BAE48414; for O8 (IAI1), CAR00706; for enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) O139:H28 (E24377A), ABV19201; for verotoxigenic E. coli O15, AAT76975; for EAEC (55989), CAV00812; for O44 (O44-20), BAE48399.
Statistical analysis. Analysis of variance and Pearson's chi-square test were used to test associations between the clinical courses of E. coli O157:H7 infections (acute diarrhea, bloody diarrhea, or HUS) and the presence of the lpfA genes.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Trees based on sequence data from the lpfA1 (A) and lpfA2 (B) genes. Shown are the phylogenetic positions of the 525-bp and 603-bp E. coli O157:H7 lpfA1 and lpA2 genes from strain EDL933, respectively, and the corresponding lpfA1 and lpfA2 DNA sequences from E. coli and Salmonella strains currently available in GenBank (for accession numbers, see Materials and Methods). The occurrence (percentage) of the branching order in 1,000 bootstrapped trees is given at each branch. E. coli strains (with serotypes given in parentheses) listed include EDL933, EC4115, and Sakai (O157:H7), DEC5A (O55:H7), DEC7A (O157:H43), DEC8B (O111:H8), DEC10A (O26:H11), DEC11A (O128:H2), DEC15A (O111:H21), ECOR7 (O85:HNT), ECOR23 (O86:H43), ECOR28 (O104:NM), ECOR30 (O13:H21), ECOR33 (O7:H21), ECOR36 (O79:H25), ECOR40 (O7:NM), ECOR42 (ONT:H26), ECOR46 (O1:H6), ECOR48 (ONT:HNT), ECOR65 (ONT:H10), ECOR67 (O4:H43), O119-53 (O119:NM), E2348/69 (O127:H6), EH41 (O113:H21), O44-20 (O44), IAI1 (O8), 83/39 (O15:H–), O26:H11 (O26:H11), ED1a (O81), 789 (O78), chi7122 (O78:H9), SE11 (O152:H28), O15 (verocytotoxigenic E. coli O15), E24377A (ETEC O139:H28), and 55989 (EAEC). Salmonella enterica strains listed (with serovars given in parentheses) include P125109 (S. Enteritidis), CT02021853 (S. Dublin), SL254 (S. Newport), SL476 (S. Heidelberg), and LT2 (S. Typhimurium).
|
We selected the lpfA genes for our analysis for several reasons. (i) The LPF are a novel determinant of EHEC O157:H7 tropism for the human intestinal tract (9). The expression of the LPF in LEE-negative strains of EHEC is believed to be important for the development of severe diarrhea and hence is potentially clinically relevant (8, 23). (ii) A large number of intestinal pathogenic E. coli strains associated with severe and/or epidemic disease possess the lpf genes, and it is postulated that they express the LPF (28, 31, 34). A study analyzing lpf genes in a collection of pathogenic E. coli strains of different categories isolated from the intestine found that the lpf genes are not specific to EHEC O157:H7; they are present in other diarrheagenic E. coli (DEC) strains and in the standard collection of ECOR strains (28, 31, 34). These findings suggest that there is a relationship between the lpfA gene variant and the phylogenetic group. (iii) Our current data confirmed that lpfA genes are present in intestinal pathogens, such as E. coli, Salmonella, and Shigella spp.; however, elucidation of genome sequences recently deposited in GenBank has now demonstrated that lpfA1 and lpfA2 homologues are also present in the genomes of ExPEC strains, in E. coli strains of other pathotypes causing infection in animals, and, unexpectedly, in some isolates from healthy humans that are considered to be commensal E. coli strains. The presence of these genes seems to be widespread in pathogenic E. coli strains of different origins, which justified their study as putative markers to identify outbreak strains of specific pathotypes that occur in specific locations around the world.
Prevalence of lpf1 and lpf2 genes in reference collections of pathogenic E. coli strains.
Because a large portion of lpfA DNA sequences available in the database belong to pathogenic E. coli strains producing A/E lesions (A/E E. coli [AEEC]), we hypothesized that the lpfA genes might contain conserved regions useful for classifying these genes into different types (variants) and that these variants might be present in specific virulent serotypes. We aligned all the available DNA sequences and found several conserved regions (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), allowing us to group the lpfA1 genes into at least five different types (we named them alleles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) and the lpfA2 genes into three distinct types (alleles 1, 2, and 3). Using these conserved regions, we designed pairs of oligonucleotides (Table 1) that specifically amplified these segments in the different lpfA types, and then we determined by PCR analysis whether these lpfA variants were present in all strains or only in specific subsets of AEEC strains as well as in E. coli strains in reference collections. As indicated in Table 2, by using the DEC reference collection (strains were kindly provided by the late Thomas Whittam [Michigan State University]) and ECOR, as well as other prototypic AEEC strains, we determined that the different lpfA types are present in a wide variety of serotypes, and we observed no apparent correlation between the type of lpfA1 and/or lpfA2 gene and the bacterial pathotype. Such observations have been reported previously by C. Toma and colleagues (31); however, their study also suggested the existence of a relationship between the lpfA type and the bacterial phylogenetic group. Because it has been determined previously that AEEC strains possess distinct variants of intimin and that some of the genes encoding these proteins are associated with specific pathotypes (26), we investigated whether there was an association between intimin (eae), the lpfA types, and the different pathotypes. As shown in Table 2, an interesting correlation emerged from this association; e.g., we found that the lpfA1-1 variant was present only in those E. coli strains carrying the intimin gene types
1,
/
,
1,
2,
, µ, and
and that EPEC O127:H6 was the predominant serotype representative of that group. The lpfA1-2 gene is associated with E. coli strains carrying intimin types β1,
2/
1,
1, and
2. To our surprise, the lpfA1-3 gene was found only in AEEC strains belonging to serotype O157:H7 and in O55:H7 strains (both of these serotypes possess
1 intimin, a type of intimin found only in EHEC O157 strains and in some of the phylogenetically related serotype O55:H7 and O145 strains). In contrast, no association with any intimin type was found for strains carrying the lpfA1-4 and lpfA1-5 gene types.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Different lpfA types and their associations with intimin types in reference collections of virulent E. coli strains
|
2/
,
2,
, and
1 and that the lpfA2-2 gene was associated with E. coli strains carrying intimin type
1 (EPEC O55:H7 and EHEC O157:H7) (Table 2). Interestingly, a combination of the lpfA1-3 and lpfA2-2 types was observed only for serotypes O55:H7 and O157:H7. In contrast, no association with intimin types was found for strains carrying the lpfA2-3 gene variant. Our data strongly suggest that a correlation exists between the intimin and lpfA gene variants carried by different pathogenic E. coli strains. In the case of EHEC O157:H7, because the O55:H7 clinical isolates are rarely found, the use of lpfA genes as probes in combination with the use of the intimin types could result in a specific test for the O157:H7 strains and for other pathogenic E. coli strains. The idea of distinguishing pathogenic E. coli strains belonging to different pathotypes through sequence-based comparison of their virulence-associated genes has been demonstrated previously (30). In that study, 12 putative virulence genes from ExPEC strains were evaluated based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The investigators found that only polymorphisms in the fimH gene (which encodes a minor component of the type 1 fimbriae) were able to distinguish uropathogenic E. coli strains from other ExPEC organisms. With those concepts in mind, we performed a comprehensive analysis of a large collection of EPEC and STEC strains for the presence of the different intimin and lpfA gene variants.
Specific combinations of lpfA and intimin gene types are present in STEC and EPEC strains.
To determine whether the lpfA gene types could be used as a simple, inexpensive screening test for epidemiological studies of pathogenic E. coli strains, we analyzed collections of EPEC and STEC strains located in our reference laboratory in Spain, mainly representing isolates from Europe and Brazil (Table 3). The identification of the different intimin and lpfA gene variants in these strains produced the following results. The lpfA1-3 and lpfA2-2 alleles were present only in strains carrying the intimin
1 gene (STEC O157:H7, EPEC O55:H7, and two rare aEPEC isolates of serotypes O33:H7 and O163:H7). These combinations of alleles are not present in other STEC strains and can be used as a discriminatory tool because, while other STEC strains from serotypes O26:H11, O111:H–, and O111:H8 possessed the lpfA1 and lpfA2 genes, they carried the lpfA1-2 and lpfA2-1 alleles in combination with intimin gene types β1 and
1 (Table 3). Among the EPEC strains (this pathotype represents typical EPEC strains that possess the EPEC adherence factor [EAF] virulence plasmid and carry the bfp fimbrial genes), the majority possess only one of the two lpfA genes. The majority of the EPEC strains analyzed possess the lpfA1-1 allele in combination with eae type
1 (O55:H6, O127:H6),
(O86:H34),
(O86:H34),
1 (O125:H–),
2 (ONT:H45), or µ (O55:H– and O55:H51). In contrast, the majority of the aEPEC strains (which lack the EAF virulence plasmid and the bfp genes) possess the lpfA1-2 and lpfA2-1 genes in combination with eae types β1 and
2 (Table 3). Overall, these results indicated that a strong correlation exists between the intimin types and the lpfA gene variants, and they also suggested that the presence of both lpfA1 and lpfA2 alleles is associated with pathogenic E. coli strains, particularly with those belonging to the STEC pathotype.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Correlation of lpfA types with STEC and EPEC serotypes in a collection of strains from the LRECa
|
1 gene, and they all carried the lpfA1-3 and lpfA2-2 gene combination, strongly supporting the idea that these three genes are reliable markers for the identification of this highly virulent serotype. Then we determined whether a correlation exists between the presence of these genes and the pathotypes in a collection of EPEC strains. As shown in Table 4, different types of lpfA1 and lpfA2 genes were found in combination with intimin gene variants. However, some trends were evident. (i) The majority of lpfA genes belong to the lpfA1-2 and/or the lpfA2-1 variant. (ii) The strains possessing lpfA1-2 and lpfA2-1 type genes also carried intimin gene types β1,
1,
, o, and
1. (iii) The majority of the Chilean EPEC strains, whether they belonged to the typical or the atypical EPEC pathotype, either possessed both lpfA1 and lpfA2 genes or lacked both of these genes. Interestingly, novel trends also emerged from our analysis; for example, we identified strains of serotype O145:H8 carrying a unique combination of lpfA genes (lpfA1-5 with lpfA2-1). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Correlation of lpfA types with EHEC and EPEC serotypes in a collection of strains from the Center for Vaccine Development, Santiago, Chile
|
Our own initial studies, combined with observations by other groups, suggested that the lpf genes are associated with particular serotypes and/or specific genotypes (16, 28, 32-34). However, further studies indicated that the EHEC O157:H7 lpfA genes are widely distributed among DEC strains (31). Our current study confirmed and expanded these observations, because we now demonstrated that certain variants of the lpfA1 and lpfA2 genes are restricted to strains carrying intimin type
(mainly EHEC O157:H7 and EPEC O55:H7). The study by Toma and colleagues tried to understand the relationship between lpfA variants and phylogenetic groups (31); unfortunately, at the time of that study, the number of variants available in the database was limited, and the phylogenetic trees obtained were incongruent with the strain phylogeny. Although it is evident that the lpf gene clusters are widely distributed in different E. coli lineages, and the lpfA genes seem not to be specific to EHEC strains, the availability of additional sequences in the database and the incorporation of the different intimin types into our analysis led us to identify specific combinations of genes present only in AEEC strains that are associated with severe and/or epidemic disease. Overall, our results indicate that the combination of these three gene markers (eae, lpfA1, and lpfA2) could be sufficient for performing a quick identification of AEEC isolates, specifically for the quick identification of the highly virulent serotype O157:H7.
One additional task that we are currently undertaking is the complete elucidation of the evolutionary history of the lpf gene clusters in DEC strains, as well as in ExPEC, commensal E. coli, Shigella, and Salmonella strains. This analysis includes mapping of the chromosomal location of the lpf gene clusters (in EHEC O157:H7, lpfA1 is linked to O-island 141 [OI-141], while lpfA2 is located in OI-154) and characterization of the other open reading frames within the lpf operons, because studies with other fimbrial gene clusters have suggested that different regions within an operon have diverse evolutionary histories (5). But it is now evident that the acquisition of different lpf gene clusters in specific lineages of E. coli might be contributing to the emergence of highly virulent strains derived from commensal organisms, which also possess unique lpf variants.
This work was supported in part by a John Sealy Memorial Endowment Fund Bridging Grant and NIH grant AI079154-01A2 to A.G.T. Work in the laboratories of T.A.T.G. was funded by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, and the Programa de Apoio a Núcleos de Excelência (PRONEX MCT/CNPq/FAPERJ); R.V. was funded by FONDECYT project 1061088; and J.B. was funded by the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, by the Xunta de Galicia, and by the Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología.
Published ahead of print on 3 June 2009. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jcm.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
2). BMC Microbiol. 5:23.[CrossRef][Medline]
O103 Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 218:311-316.[CrossRef][Medline]
) in the bovine O84:NM verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli strain 537/89 and the diagnostic value of intimin typing. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 228:370-376.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»