Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

FREE

This Article FREE Full Text (PDF) An author's correction has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Google Scholar Articles by Wang, R. Articles by Taubenberger, J. K. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, R. Articles by Taubenberger, J. K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2009, p. 2675-2677, Vol. 47, No. 8
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01087-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Detection of Novel (Swine Origin) H1N1 Influenza A Virus by Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR

Top LETTER REFERENCES

 
A novel H1N1 subtype influenza A virus, derived by reassortment between two known circulating swine influenza strains, has now been declared a human pandemic influenza A virus (8). The pandemic virus, centered initially in Mexico and the United States, has now spread to 74 countries with the World Health Organization reporting 29,669 cases and 145 deaths as of 15 June 2009 (2, 7). The potential severity of this pandemic virus is currently unknown. Because the novel virus began circulating at the end of the 2008-2009 influenza season in the northern hemisphere, distinguishing it from other influenza A viruses, especially the circulating human H1N1 viruses, is crucial not only for pandemic planning, containment, and surveillance but also for treatment. The current human H1N1 viruses are now predominantly resistant to the neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir (4), while the novel swine origin H1N1 viruses are resistant to the adamantanes (2). To this end, we developed and evaluated several reverse transcription (RT)-PCR-based assays to distinguish the human lineage H1N1 and the novel swine origin virus and report here specific RT-PCR assays for human and swine origin H1N1 and also an RT-PCR assay with one primer set that can amplify a portion of the H1 subtype hemagglutinin (HA) gene segment from avian, swine, and human origin influenza A viruses and, in a sensitive, quantitative real-time assay, distinguish both the current human H1N1 virus and the novel H1N1 virus by using specific probes in a one-tube format. Each of these real-time assays uses primers designed to match highly conserved regions of the H1 HA gene.

Influenza A virus RNA was isolated from MDCK-grown viral stocks by using the QIAamp Viral RNA extraction kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). The viruses used in the analysis are listed in the legend to Fig. 1. H1 HA sequences were aligned by using the MegAlign program (DNAStar Inc., Madison, WI) for design of H1 HA primers and specific probes (Table 1). First-strand cDNA was produced by using random primers with 4 µl viral RNA lysate in a 20-µl reaction mixture containing 200 U Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and following the manufacturer's instructions.

View larger version (72K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. RT-PCR for H1 subtype HAs. (A) RT-PCR amplification with the universal H1 HA primer set (set 3). cDNAs from swine, human, and avian origin H1 subtype influenza A viruses were amplified. The final reaction mixture contained 1x PCR Gold buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate mixture, 4 U AmpliTaq Gold polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and 0.6 µM primers. Thermocycling was performed in a DNAEngine (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) under the following cycling conditions: 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min. PCR products were electrophoresed on a 2% Tris-acetate-EDTA agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and photographed under UV transillumination. Lanes (left to right): 1, 100-bp DNA molecular weight ladder; 2, A/swine/Ohio/23/1935(H1N1), 3, A/swine/Jamesburg/1942 (H1N1), 4, A/swine/Wisconsin/1/1967 (H1N1); 5, A/Maryland/NIH-37/2009 (H1N1); 6, A/Maryland/NIH-39/2009 (H1N1); 7, A/mallard/Ohio/171/1990 (H1N1); 8, A/green-winged teal/Ohio/72/1999(H1N1); 9, A/green-winged teal/Ohio/430/1987 (H1N1); 10, A/California/04/2009 (H1N1); 11, A/New York/470/2004 (H3N2); 12, water. (B) Amplification curve for influenza A virus H1 HA real-time RT-PCR assay. Shown are the 10–1 to 10–5 dilutions of A/California/04/2009 (H1N1) cDNA (final concentrations, 0.4 ng to 40 fg viral RNA per reaction mixture) with the FAM (novel swine origin) probe. Reactions were run in duplicate. The final reaction mixture contained 1x ABI master mix (Applied Biosystems), 0.9 µM primers, and 0.25 µM of each probe under the following cycling conditions: 2 min at 50°C and 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. RT-PCR primers and probes designed for this study

A conventional RT-PCR was performed with 2 µl cDNA in a 50-µl reaction mixture (the legend to Fig. 1 contains reaction details). PCR products were analyzed with a 2% Tris-acetate-EDTA agarose gel. A real-time RT-PCR was performed with a 7500 Real Time PCR system (ABI, Foster City, CA) with 1 µl cDNA in a 25-µl reaction mixture (the legend to Fig. 1 contains reaction details). A control real-time RT-PCR for the influenza A virus matrix gene was performed as described previously (6).

All influenza A virus cDNA samples were positive in the control matrix gene RT-PCR assay. The universal H1 primer set (set 3) was able to amplify cDNAs from H1 subtype influenza A viruses of avian, classical swine, human, and novel swine origins. Template cDNA from a human H3N2 virus was negative (Fig. 1A). The analytical sensitivities of the novel H1 TaqMan assays were determined. RT-PCRs were set up with template cDNA equivalent to 4 ng of viral RNA, followed by five 10-fold serial dilutions to 40 fg of viral RNA equivalent. In all three sets (Table 1), consistent amplification and detection were observed across 6 orders of magnitude (Fig. 1B). The estimated limit of influenza A virus detection was 40 fg viral RNA (5,200 viral genome copies) with the three TaqMan assays, similar to results obtained with other quantitative influenza A virus real-time assays (3). The specific real-time assays for both the novel swine origin H1 (set 1) and human (seasonal) H1 (set 2) sequences each demonstrated high specificity and did not result in cycle threshold (C_T) values of 40 in the absence of a novel swine origin H1N1 or human H1N1 template, respectively. With the universal primer set (set 3), templates from H1 subtype viruses of avian, classical swine, human, and novel swine origins were all amplified (Fig. 1A); however, when run as a TaqMan assay, the human H1N1 template was only positive with the human H1 probe, while the novel swine origin H1N1 template was only positive with the novel swine H1 probe (Fig. 1B), demonstrating the specificity of the assay. Other real-time assays for the novel virus have been developed (1, 5). Because of rapid mutation in the novel swine origin H1N1 H1 HA gene, the TaqMan assay widely distributed for rapid testing (1) now has several mismatches in the reverse primer sequence, which may decrease its sensitivity. The advantage of the one-tube assay with two probes labeled with 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) and VIC reported here is that samples can be specifically identified as being either human H1N1 or novel swine origin H1N1 in one sensitive real-time RT-PCR.

 
This work was supported by the intramural program of the NIAID and the NIH.

We thank Ruben Donis, Richard Webby, and Matthew Memoli for providing influenza viral samples.

 
Published ahead of print on 24 June 2009.

R.W. and Z.-M.S. contributed equally to the study.

Top LETTER REFERENCES

 

1
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 12 May 2009, posting date. H1N1 Flu (Swine Flu): Resources for Laboratories. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/lab/.
2
2. Garten, R. J., C. T. Davis, C. A. Russell, B. Shu, S. Lindstrom, A. Balish, W. M. Sessions, X. Xu, E. Skepner, V. Deyde, M. Okomo-Adhiambo, L. Gubareva, J. Barnes, C. B. Smith, S. L. Emery, M. J. Hillman, P. Rivailler, J. Smagala, M. de Graaf, D. F. Burke, R. A. Fouchier, C. Pappas, C. M. Alpuche-Aranda, H. Lopez-Gatell, H. Olivera, I. Lopez, C. A. Myers, D. Faix, P. J. Blair, C. Yu, K. M. Keene, P. D. Dotson, Jr., D. Boxrud, A. R. Sambol, S. H. Abid, K. St. George, T. Bannerman, A. L. Moore, D. J. Stringer, P. Blevins, G. J. Demmler-Harrison, M. Ginsberg, P. Kriner, S. Waterman, S. Smole, H. F. Guevara, E. A. Belongia, P. A. Clark, S. T. Beatrice, R. Donis, J. Katz, L. Finelli, C. B. Bridges, M. Shaw, D. B. Jernigan, T. M. Uyeki, D. J. Smith, A. I. Klimov, and N. J. Cox. 22 May 2009. Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science doi:10.1126/science.1176225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Krafft, A. E., K. L. Russell, A. W. Hawksworth, S. McCall, M. Irvine, L. T. Daum, J. L. Connoly, A. H. Reid, J. C. Gaydos, and J. K. Taubenberger. 2005. Evaluation of PCR testing of ethanol-fixed nasal swab specimens as an augmented surveillance strategy for influenza virus and adenovirus identification. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:1768-1775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Layne, S. P., A. S. Monto, and J. K. Taubenberger. 2009. Pandemic influenza: an inconvenient mutation. Science 323:1560-1561.[Free Full Text]
5
5. Poon, L. L., K. H. Chan, G. J. Smith, C. S. Leung, Y. Guan, K. Y. Yuen, and J. S. Peiris. 21 May 2009. Molecular detection of a novel human influenza (H1N1) of pandemic potential by conventional and real-time quantitative RT-PCR assays. Clin. Chem. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2009.130229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Runstadler, J. A., G. M. Happ, R. D. Slemons, Z. M. Sheng, N. Gundlach, M. Petrula, D. Senne, J. Nolting, D. L. Evers, A. Modrell, H. Huson, S. Hills, T. Rothe, T. Marr, and J. K. Taubenberger. 2007. Using RRT-PCR analysis and virus isolation to determine the prevalence of avian influenza virus infections in ducks at Minto Flats State Game Refuge, Alaska, during August 2005. Arch. Virol. 152:1901-1910.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. World Health Organization. 12 June 2009, posting date. Influenza A (H1N1)—update 48. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.who.int/csr/don/2009_06_12/en/index.html.
8
8. World Health Organization. 11 June 2009, posting date. World now at the start of 2009 influenza pandemic. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2009/h1n1_pandemic_phase6_20090611/en/index.html.

						Ruixue Wang Zong-Mei Sheng Jeffery K. Taubenberger* Laboratory of Infectious Diseases National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Institutes of Health 33 North Dr., Rm. 3E19A.2, MSC 3203 Bethesda, Maryland 20892-3203
						* Phone: (301) 443-5960, Fax: (301) 480-1696, E-mail: taubenbergerj{at}niaid.nih.gov

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2009, p. 2675-2677, Vol. 47, No. 8
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01087-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article FREE Full Text (PDF) An author's correction has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Google Scholar Articles by Wang, R. Articles by Taubenberger, J. K. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, R. Articles by Taubenberger, J. K.