This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ehret, J M
Right arrow Articles by Schachter, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ehret, J M
Right arrow Articles by Schachter, J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 October; 31(10): 2702-2705

Evaluation of chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men.

J M Ehret, J C Leszcynski, J M Douglas, S L Genova, M A Chernesky, J Moncada and J Schachter

Disease Control Service, Denver Department of Public Health, Colorado.

ABSTRACT

Paired first-voided urine and urethral swab specimens were collected from 540 men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics in three geographic locations. Urine specimens were tested for the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis by commercial enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme), and the results were compared with those of urethral swab cultures. Overall prevalence of urethral C. trachomatis by culture was 14%, and the Chlamydiazyme assay had an overall sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 96%, a positive predictive value of 76%, and a negative predictive value of 97%. Sensitivity was greater (94%) in those culture-positive samples with a high antigen load (> or = 20 inclusion-forming units per coverslip) than those with a lower antigen load (68%). Assay of urine specimens from men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics by Chlamydiazyme appears to be a reliable, noninvasive method of detection of C. trachomatis infection, and further evaluation of its performance in asymptomatic and low-prevalence populations is indicated.


J Clin Microbiol. 1993 October; 31(10): 2702-2705




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • WATSON, E. J., TEMPLETON, A., RUSSELL, I., PAAVONEN, J., MARDH, P.-A., STARY, A., PEDERSON, B. S. (2002). The accuracy and efficacy of screening tests for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review. J Med Microbiol 51: 1021-1031 [Abstract] [Full Text]