Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 09 1995, 2388-2391, Vol 33, No. 9
PH Miller, LS Wiggs and JM Miller
The Oxoid AnaeroGen system was compared with the BBL GasPak for the
production of an anaerobic atmosphere and was evaluated for its ability to
support the growth of 135 clinically significant anaerobic bacteria. An
anaerobe chamber was used as the "gold standard" for supporting the growth
of anaerobes. The AnaeroGen requires no catalyst, produces no hydrogen,
requires no water, and reduces preparation time to a minimum. The
water-activated BBL GasPak generates hydrogen. For 132 of the 135 strains
tested, better initial growth at 48 h was noted for the jar methods than
for the anaerobe chamber. At 72 h, 113 of the 135 strains showed equal
growth, and at 7 days, only marginal differences in growth patterns were
noted. The AnaeroGen never failed to reduce the anaerobic indicator, while
the BBL GasPak occasionally failed to do so. The AnaeroGen performed at
least as well as, and sometimes better than, the established methods. The
AnaeroGen is a good alternative for use in anaerobic jars.
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of AnaeroGen system for growth of anaerobic bacteria
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»