This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dreyer, G. Articles by Addiss, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dreyer, G. Articles by Addiss, D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Oct 1996, 2569-2571, Vol 34, No. 10
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Patterns of detection of Strongyloides stercoralis in stool specimens: implications for diagnosis and clinical trials

G Dreyer, E Fernandes-Silva, S Alves, A Rocha, R Albuquerque and D Addiss
Departamento de Parasitologia, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhaes- FIOCRUZ, Recife, Brazil.

Reported efficacies of drugs used to treat Strongyloides stercoralis infection vary widely. Because diagnostic methods are insensitive, therapeutic trials generally require multiple negative posttreatment stool specimens as evidence of drug efficacy. However, only a single positive stool specimen is usually required for study enrollment. To determine the reproducibility of detection of S. stercoralis larvae in the stool, 108 asymptomatic infected men submitted 25 g of fresh stool once a week for eight consecutive weeks for examination by the Baermann technique. During the 8-week study, 239 (27.7%) of 864 stool specimens were positive for S. stercoralis. Rates of detection of larvae in the stool specimens ranged from eight of eight specimens in 3 (2.8%) men to none of eight specimens in 36 (33.3%) men. Of 43 men for whom S. stercoralis was detected in at least two of the first four stool specimens, only 1 (2.3%) man tested negative on all of the next four specimens. In comparison, of 29 men who had detectable larvae in only one of the first four specimens, 22 (75.9%) tested negative on all of the next four samples. Thus, if these 29 men had been enrolled in a therapeutic trial between the first and second sets of four specimens, the efficacy of a drug with no activity against this parasite would have been estimated to be 76%. These data suggest that patterns of S. stercoralis detection vary widely among infected persons and that intermittent larval shedding can lead to inflated estimates of drug efficacy. Before a patient is entered in a clinical trial of drug efficacy, four consecutive stool specimens should be examined for S. stercoralis; only persons with two or more positive specimens should be enrolled.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• van Doorn, H. R., Koelewijn, R., Hofwegen, H., Gilis, H., Wetsteyn, J. C. F. M., Wismans, P. J., Sarfati, C., Vervoort, T., van Gool, T. (2007). Use of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Dipstick Assay for Detection of Strongyloides stercoralis Infection in Humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 438-442 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Boscolo, M., Gobbo, M., Mantovani, W., Degani, M., Anselmi, M., Monteiro, G. B., Marocco, S., Angheben, A., Mistretta, M., Santacatterina, M., Tais, S., Bisoffi, Z. (2007). Evaluation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay for Strongyloidiasis as a Tool for Diagnosis and Follow-Up. CVI 14: 129-133 [Abstract] [Full Text]