Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Oct 1996, 2604-2606, Vol 34, No. 10
RL Atmar, BD Baxter, EA Dominguez and LH Taber
We applied a reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay for influenza A virus to
combined nasal wash-throat swab specimens previously obtained from an
outpatient pediatric population with acute respiratory illness during
concurrent epidemics of influenza A virus and respiratory syncytial virus.
The results of the RT-PCR assay were compared with those previously
reported with virus cultivation and commercially available rapid diagnostic
kits (E.A. Dominguez, L.H. Taber, and R.B. Couch, J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:2286-2290, 1993). With virus cultivation as the "gold standard", the
RT-PCR assay had a sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of 95, 98, and
97%, respectively, compared with 75, 100, and 93%, respectively, for the
best diagnostic kit (Becton Dickinson Directigen). RT-PCR is an effective
alternative to virus isolation for the detection of influenza A virus in
clinical specimens.
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of reverse transcription-PCR with tissue culture and other rapid diagnostic assays for detection of type A influenza virus
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. ratmar@fluctr.bcm.tmc.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»