Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Feb 1996, 355-357, Vol 34, No. 2
AJ Morris, LK Smith, S Mirrett and LB Reller
We have evaluated the yield of several tests and have instituted specimen
rejection criteria to reduce costs and save time. For a 12- month period,
we recorded the reduction of these tests and calculated the resultant cost
and time savings. Seven changes were analyzed: not performing fungal or
mycobacterial (acid-fast bacillus) cultures on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
specimens from patients without known immunosuppression when chemistry and
cell count are normal; not performing routine stool culture or ovum and
parasite examination on specimens from patients in the hospital for > 3
days; not culturing endotracheal suction aspirates when no organisms or
> 10 squamous epithelial cells are present; discontinuing broth cultures
on all specimens except for tissue, continuous ambulatory peritoneal
dialysis fluid, and CSF from patients with shunts; and eliminating
bacterial antigen tests. For each test, the number not performed (n),
reagent savings, and technologist time saved, respectively, were as
follows: CSF fungal culture, 267, $999, and 67 h; CSF acid-fast bacillus
culture, 275, $1,662, and 124 h; stool cultures, 320, $2,991, and 98 h;
ovum and parasite examinations, 216, $525, and 108 h; endotracheal suction
aspirate cultures, 1,505, $4,447, and 306 h; broth cultures, 5,218, $4,931,
and 80 h; and bacterial antigen tests, 2,598, $2,293, and 299 h. Overall,
5,181 tests were rejected and 5,218 broth cultures were omitted. Achievable
savings were $28,000 in reagent costs and 1,082 h of technologist time. In
conclusion, rejecting specimens of proven low yield saves reagent costs
and, more importantly, saves technologist time. This time can be spent on
specimens having greater diagnostic utility.
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Cost and time savings following introduction of rejection criteria for clinical specimens
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»