Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 03 1996, 534-536, Vol 34, No. 3
JM Chow, J Moncada, D Brooks, G Bolan, H Shaw and J Schachter
We evaluated the use of the leukocyte esterase test (LET) on first- catch
urine specimens from women as a screening test to predict infection with
Chlamydia trachomatis. For diagnosis, we used Abbott's ligase chain
reaction (LCR) on urine specimens and isolation by tissue culture (TC) on
cervical brushes. Of 4,053 women attending sexually transmitted disease and
family planning clinics, 4.3% (n = 174) were positive by TC and 5.9% (n =
239) were positive by LCR. When LET was compared to TC, the sensitivity,
specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were
54.0, 67.0, 6.8, and 97.0%, respectively. The corresponding performance of
LET versus LCR was 53.1, 67.3, 10.1, and 95.8%. Almost half of the
laboratory-confirmed chlamydial infections were negative by LET. The low
specificity probably reflects multiple causes of pyuria in women and
results in a low positive predictive value. LET is neither sensitive nor
specific as a predictor of chlamydial infection and cannot be recommended
for use as a screening test for C. trachomatis with first-catch urine
samples from females from low- or moderate-prevalence populations.
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Is urine leukocyte esterase test a useful screening method to predict Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women?
University of California, San Francisco, USA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»