This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tokars, J. I. Articles by Jarvis, W. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tokars, J. I. Articles by Jarvis, W. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 03 1996, 680-685, Vol 34, No. 3
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

U.S. hospital mycobacteriology laboratories: status and comparison with state public health department laboratories

JI Tokars, JR Rudnick, K Kroc, L Manangan, G Pugliese, RE Huebner, J Chan and WR Jarvis
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

In response to the resurgence of tuberculosis, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended the use of certain mycobacteriology laboratory methods to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and/or minimize times to complete specimen processing. A study to determine the extent to which these recommended methods were being used in hospital laboratories was needed. In 1992, a survey was mailed to infection control and laboratory personnel at 1,076 hospitals with > or = 100 beds to determine the mycobacterial laboratory services being performed, the methods being used, the number of specimens being processed, and the times to completion during 1991. In 1995, a 20% sample of hospital laboratories that responded to the initial questionnaire was resurveyed. Responses to the 1992 survey were received from personnel at 756 (70%) hospitals representing 750 laboratories. Among laboratories performing the services, the use of recommended methods was as follows: fluorochrome stain for acid-fast bacillus microscopy (47%); radiometric methods for primary culture (29%); rapid (radiometric methods, use of nucleic acid probes, high- performance liquid chromatography, or gas-liquid chromatography) methods for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (59%); and radiometric methods for drug susceptibility testing (55%). Reported times to complete specimen processing were shortest for laboratories that used recommended methods and longest for hospitals that referred specimens to outside laboratories. Only 46% of surveyed laboratories performed at least the minimal number of mycobacterial cultures (20/week) deemed necessary to maintain competence. Among 145 laboratories that performed the services and were resurveyed in 1995, use of recommended techniques increased from 44 to 73% for acid-fast bacillus microscopy, from 27 to 37% for primary culture, from 59 to 88% for M. tuberculosis identification, and from 55 to 75% for drug susceptibility testing. These changes were associated with reductions in reported specimen turnaround times. Use of the methods recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention increased at the resurveyed hospital mycobacteriology laboratories between 1991 and 1995. However, continued efforts are needed to increase the use of recommended methods at moderate- and high-volume laboratories, encourage referral of specimens from low-volume laboratories, and transmit results rapidly from all laboratories.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• (2005). American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: Controlling Tuberculosis in the United States. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 172: 1169-1227 [Full Text]  
• Freeman, R, Magee, J, Barrett, A (2001). Identifying sputum specimens of high priority for examination by enhanced mycobacterial detection, identification, and susceptibility systems (EMDISS) to promote the rapid diagnosis of infectious pulmonary tuberculosis. J. Clin. Pathol. 54: 613-616 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kellam, S., Pascopella, L., Desmond, E., Reingold, A., Chin, D. P. (2001). Use of Recommended Laboratory Testing Methods among Patients with Tuberculosis in California. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 1969-1971 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Harvell, J. D., Hadley, W. K., Ng, V. L. (2000). Increased Sensitivity of the BACTEC 460 Mycobacterial Radiometric Broth Culture System Does Not Decrease the Number of Respiratory Specimens Required for a Definitive Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 3608-3611 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jorgensen, J. H., Salinas, J. R., Paxson, R., Magnon, K., Patterson, J. E., Patterson, T. F. (1999). False-Positive Gen-Probe Direct Mycobacterium tuberculosis Amplification Test Results for Patients with Pulmonary M. kansasii and M. avium Infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 175-178 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Manangan, L. P., Simonds, D. N., Pugliese, G., Kroc, K., Banerjee, S. N., Rudnick, J. R., Steingraber, K., Jarvis, W. R. (1998). Are US Hospitals Making Progress in Implementing Guidelines for Prevention of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Transmission?. Arch Intern Med 158: 1440-1444 [Abstract] [Full Text]