This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reizenstein, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hallander, H. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reizenstein, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hallander, H. O.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 04 1996, 810-815, Vol 34, No. 4
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Validation of nested Bordetella PCR in pertussis vaccine trial

E Reizenstein, L Lindberg, R Mollby and HO Hallander
Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Stockholm, Sweden.

A nested PCR, using a 239-bp sequence in the pertussis toxin promoter region, was developed and evaluated. The assay differentiates Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis, and Bordetella bronchiseptica by restriction enzyme analysis of the amplified fragments. The diagnostic performance of the PCR was evaluated in a Swedish pertussis vaccine efficacy trial which took place from 1992 to 1995, including study children and household members and using culture and serology for laboratory confirmation of suspected cases. In total 2,421 nasopharyngeal aspirates were analyzed. The total diagnostic sensitivity for B. pertussis was 90.2% (194 of 215). During the study period samples were processed with and without the cation-exchange resin Chelex. The PCR diagnostic sensitivity for B. pertussis among the Chelex-treated aspirates was 94.9% (75 of 79), and that for B. pertussis among 124 aspirates in a consecutive non-Chelex-treated material was 89.5% (111 of 124). After Chelex treatment of the 13 PCR- negative samples, an additional six became PCR positive, giving a final sensitivity of 94.3%. In addition, PCR was positive for B. pertussis with 57 of 1,744 samples negative by culture but with available serological data. The specificity of PCR with these samples was supported by a significant increase in antibody levels between acute and convalescent sera in 45 cases and by epidemiological or clinical data in all but two of the remaining cases. PCR was also positive for B. pertussis with 26 of 415 aspirates from episodes lacking serology. The diagnostic sensitivity of PCR for B. parapertussis was 74.0% (37 of 50). There were an additional seven culture-negative B. parapertussis PCR findings, six from cases with significant antibody increases against filamentous hemagglutinin only and one from a case lacking serology. There were no samples positive for B. bronchiseptica. In conclusion, PCR detection of B. pertussis and/or B. parapertussis enabled us to identify 90 positive nasopharyngeal aspirates, in addition to the 262 culture-positive samples (an increase of 34%). Relating these cases to serology and clinical data indicated a PCR specificity approaching 100%.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Choi, Y.-J., Lee, S.-H., Park, K.-H., Koh, Y.-S., Lee, K.-H., Baik, H.-S., Choi, M.-S., Kim, I.-S., Jang, W.-J. (2005). Evaluation of PCR-Based Assay for Diagnosis of Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiosis in Human Serum Samples. CVI 12: 759-763 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mattoo, S., Cherry, J. D. (2005). Molecular Pathogenesis, Epidemiology, and Clinical Manifestations of Respiratory Infections Due to Bordetella pertussis and Other Bordetella Subspecies. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18: 326-382 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Templeton, K. E., Scheltinga, S. A., van der Zee, A., Diederen, B. M. W., Kruijssen, A. M., Goossens, H., Kuijper, E., Claas, E. C. J. (2003). Evaluation of Real-Time PCR for Detection of and Discrimination between Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis, and Bordetella holmesii for Clinical Diagnosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4121-4126 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kosters, K., Reischl, U., Schmetz, J., Riffelmann, M., Wirsing von Konig, C. H. (2002). Real-Time LightCycler PCR for Detection and Discrimination of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 1719-1722 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • KOSTERS, K., RIFFELMANN, M., VON KONIG, C. H. W. (2001). Evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for detection of Bordetella pertussis and B. parapertussis in clinical samples. J Med Microbiol 50: 436-440 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Heininger, U., Schmidt-Schläpfer, G., Cherry, J. D., Stehr, K. (2000). Clinical Validation of a Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Diagnosis of Pertussis by Comparison With Serology, Culture, and Symptoms During a Large Pertussis Vaccine Efficacy Trial. Pediatrics 105: 31e-31 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nygren, M., Reizenstein, E., Ronaghi, M., Lundeberg, J. (2000). Polymorphism in the Pertussis Toxin Promoter Region Affecting the DNA-Based Diagnosis of Bordetella Infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 55-60 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Farrell, D. J., Daggard, G., Mukkur, T. K. S. (1999). Nested Duplex PCR To Detect Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis and Its Application in Diagnosis of Pertussis in Nonmetropolitan Southeast Queensland, Australia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 606-610 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lind-Brandberg, L., Welinder-Olsson, C., Lagergård, T., Taranger, J., Trollfors, B., Zackrisson, G. (1998). Evaluation of PCR for Diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis Infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 679-683 [Abstract] [Full Text]