This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Eldere, J.
Right arrow Articles by Surmont, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Eldere, J.
Right arrow Articles by Surmont, I.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 04 1996, 842-847, Vol 34, No. 4
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Fluconazole and amphotericin B antifungal susceptibility testing by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method compared with E-test and semiautomated broth microdilution test

J van Eldere, L Joosten, V Verhaeghe and I Surmont
Rega Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.

A comparative study of fluconazole and amphotericin B susceptibility testing was performed with 68 clinical Candida species isolates and three test methods. The methods used were an agar diffusion method (E- test) and two broth dilution methods, the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) reference broth macrodilution method and an in-house-prepared semiautomated broth microdilution method based on the Bioscreen turbidometer. In the microdilution method, growth of the yeasts was measured continuously by the automatic turbidometer (Bioscreen), which permitted precise and objective determination of endpoints. MIC endpoints were read after 24 h for the microdilution method and the E-test. Amphotericin B susceptibility testing with the NCCLS method and the E-test yielded comparable results in 89% of the tests, meaning that the endpoints obtained were identical or differed by no more than 2 twofold dilutions. The NCCLS and broth microdilution tests scored 97% comparable results, and the E-test and the broth microdilution test yielded 90% comparable results. Fluconazole susceptibility testing produced 96% comparable results with the NCCLS test and the E-test, 100% comparable results with the NCCLS and the microdilution methods, and 98.5% comparable results with the microdilution method and the E-test. We conclude that the E-test and the Bioscreen microdilution method are valuable alternatives to the NCCLS reference method for routine susceptibility testing of Candida species with fluconazole and amphotericin B.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Matthews, R. C., Rigg, G., Hodgetts, S., Carter, T., Chapman, C., Gregory, C., Illidge, C., Burnie, J. (2003). Preclinical Assessment of the Efficacy of Mycograb, a Human Recombinant Antibody against Fungal HSP90. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 2208-2216 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Matar, M. J., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Paetznick, V. L., Rodriguez, J. R., Chen, E., Rex, J. H. (2003). Correlation between E-Test, Disk Diffusion, and Microdilution Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Fluconazole and Voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1647-1651 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Warn, P. A., Sharp, A., Morrissey, G., Denning, D. W. (2002). In vivo activity of micafungin in a persistently neutropenic murine model of disseminated infection caused by Candida tropicalis. J Antimicrob Chemother 50: 1071-1074 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Davies, A., Brailsford, S., Broadley, K., Beighton, D. (2002). Resistance amongst yeasts isolated from the oral cavities of patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Med 16: 527-531 [Abstract]  
  • Vandenbossche, I., Vaneechoutte, M., Vandevenne, M., De Baere, T., Verschraegen, G. (2002). Susceptibility Testing of Fluconazole by the NCCLS Broth Macrodilution Method, E-Test, and Disk Diffusion for Application in the Routine Laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 918-921 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chryssanthou, E. (2001). Trends in Antifungal Susceptibility among Swedish Candida Species Bloodstream Isolates from 1994 to 1998: Comparison of the E-test and the Sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Antifungal Panel with the NCCLS M27-A Reference Method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 4181-4183 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Osherov, N., Kontoyiannis, D. P., Romans, A., May, G. S. (2001). Resistance to itraconazole in Aspergillus nidulans and Aspergillus fumigatus is conferred by extra copies of the A. nidulans P-450 14{{alpha}}-demethylase gene, pdmA. J Antimicrob Chemother 48: 75-81 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Arendrup, M., Lundgren, B., Jensen, I. M., Hansen, B. S., Frimodt-Moller, N. (2001). Comparison of Etest and a tablet diffusion test with the NCCLS broth microdilution method for fluconazole and amphotericin B susceptibility testing of Candida isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 47: 521-526 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ambler, J E, Kerawala, M, Yaneza, A, Drabu, Y J (2001). Evaluation of CHROMagar candida for rapid identification and Etest for antifungal susceptibility testing in a district general hospital laboratory. J. Clin. Pathol. 54: 158-159 [Full Text]  
  • Warn, P. A., Morrissey, J., Moore, C. B., Denning, D. W. (2000). In Vivo Activity of Amphotericin B Lipid Complex in Immunocompromised Mice against Fluconazole-Resistant or Fluconazole-Susceptible Candida tropicalis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 2664-2671 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Alvarez-Barrientos, A., Arroyo, J., Canton, R., Nombela, C., Sanchez-Perez, M. (2000). Applications of Flow Cytometry to Clinical Microbiology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13: 167-195 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Clancy, C. J., Nguyen, M. H. (1999). Correlation between In Vitro Susceptibility Determined by E Test and Response to Therapy with Amphotericin B: Results from a Multicenter Prospective Study of Candidemia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43: 1289-1290 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Martin-Mazuelos, E., Gutierrez, M. J., Aller, A. I., Bernal, S., Martinez, M. A., Montero, O., Quindos, G. (1999). A comparative evaluation of Etest and broth microdilution methods for fluconazole and itraconazole susceptibility testing of Candida spp.. J Antimicrob Chemother 43: 477-481 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»