Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 1996, 1277-1279, Vol 34, No. 5
E Arruda, CE Crump, BS Rollins, A Ohlin and FG Hayden
The recovery of human rhinovirus (HRV) from nasal washings and nasal and
pharyngeal swabs from volunteers with naturally acquired colds was compared
in different cell types. Human embryonic lung fibroblast (HELF) strain
WI-38 (sensitivity, 61 to 84%) and HeLa-I, an HRV- susceptible HeLa clone
(sensitivity, 86 to 94%), were the most sensitive cell types used.
HELF-WI-38 cells showed a cytopathic effect earlier than the other cells
used, and the different strains of HRV- susceptible HeLa cells varied in
their sensitivities for HRV isolation. HRV was detected in a single cell
type in 20 to 35% of the positive samples, suggesting that use of a
combination of different HRV- susceptible cell lines is the best approach
for the recovery of HRV. Although nasal washings tended to yield more HRV
isolates than nasal and pharyngeal swabs, the two sampling methods were not
found to be significantly different.
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparative susceptibilities of human embryonic fibroblasts and HeLa cells for isolation of human rhinoviruses
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908, USA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»