This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arruda, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hayden, F. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arruda, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hayden, F. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 1996, 1277-1279, Vol 34, No. 5
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparative susceptibilities of human embryonic fibroblasts and HeLa cells for isolation of human rhinoviruses

E Arruda, CE Crump, BS Rollins, A Ohlin and FG Hayden
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908, USA.

The recovery of human rhinovirus (HRV) from nasal washings and nasal and pharyngeal swabs from volunteers with naturally acquired colds was compared in different cell types. Human embryonic lung fibroblast (HELF) strain WI-38 (sensitivity, 61 to 84%) and HeLa-I, an HRV- susceptible HeLa clone (sensitivity, 86 to 94%), were the most sensitive cell types used. HELF-WI-38 cells showed a cytopathic effect earlier than the other cells used, and the different strains of HRV- susceptible HeLa cells varied in their sensitivities for HRV isolation. HRV was detected in a single cell type in 20 to 35% of the positive samples, suggesting that use of a combination of different HRV- susceptible cell lines is the best approach for the recovery of HRV. Although nasal washings tended to yield more HRV isolates than nasal and pharyngeal swabs, the two sampling methods were not found to be significantly different.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mahony, J. B. (2008). Detection of Respiratory Viruses by Molecular Methods. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 21: 716-747 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pevear, D. C., Hayden, F. G., Demenczuk, T. M., Barone, L. R., McKinlay, M. A., Collett, M. S. (2005). Relationship of Pleconaril Susceptibility and Clinical Outcomes in Treatment of Common Colds Caused by Rhinoviruses. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 4492-4499 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Deffernez, C., Wunderli, W., Thomas, Y., Yerly, S., Perrin, L., Kaiser, L. (2004). Amplicon Sequencing and Improved Detection of Human Rhinovirus in Respiratory Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 3212-3218 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Winther, B., Arruda, E., Witek, T. J., Marlin, S. D., Tsianco, M. M., Innes, D. J., Hayden, F. G. (2002). Expression of ICAM-1 in Nasal Epithelium and Levels of Soluble ICAM-1 in Nasal Lavage Fluid During Human Experimental Rhinovirus Infection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128: 131-136 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Blomqvist, S., Skyttä, A., Roivainen, M., Hovi, T. (1999). Rapid Detection of Human Rhinoviruses in Nasopharyngeal Aspirates by a Microwell Reverse Transcription-PCR-Hybridization Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 2813-2816 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Turner, R. B., Wecker, M. T., Pohl, G., Witek, T. J., McNally, E., St. George, R., Winther, B., Hayden, F. G. (1999). Efficacy of Tremacamra, a Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1, for Experimental Rhinovirus Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 281: 1797-1804 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Svitkin, Y. V., Gradi, A., Imataka, H., Morino, S., Sonenberg, N. (1999). Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4GII (eIF4GII), but Not eIF4GI, Cleavage Correlates with Inhibition of Host Cell Protein Synthesis after Human Rhinovirus Infection. J. Virol. 73: 3467-3472 [Abstract] [Full Text]