This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klespies, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Maurer, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klespies, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Maurer, C. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Jun 1996, 1465-1467, Vol 34, No. 6
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Detection of enteroviruses from clinical specimens by spin amplification shell vial culture and monoclonal antibody assay

SL Klespies, DE Cebula, CL Kelley, D Galehouse and CC Maurer
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron, Ohio 44308, USA.

Conventional tube cell culture was compared with a 72-h, spin-amplified shell vial indirect immunofluorescence assay for the detection of enterovirus from clinical specimens. The sensitivity for the shell vial assay after resolution of discrepant results were 93 and 100%, respectively. The shell vial assay detected 93% of the positive cultures within 72 h of incubation while conventional tube culture detected only 51% of the positive cultures within the same time interval. The data suggest that a spin-amplified shell vial indirect immunofluorescence assay may be useful for the detection of enterovirus from clinical specimens.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Miao, L. Y., Pierce, C., Gray-Johnson, J., DeLotell, J., Shaw, C., Chapman, N., Yeh, E., Schnurr, D., Huang, Y. T. (2009). Monoclonal Antibodies to VP1 Recognize a Broad Range of Enteroviruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3108-3113 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mahony, J. B. (2008). Detection of Respiratory Viruses by Molecular Methods. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 21: 716-747 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Terletskaia-Ladwig, E., Meier, S., Hahn, R., Leinmuller, M., Schneider, F., Enders, M. (2008). A convenient rapid culture assay for the detection of enteroviruses in clinical samples: comparison with conventional cell culture and RT-PCR. J Med Microbiol 57: 1000-1006 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lin, T.-L., Li, Y.-S., Huang, C.-W., Hsu, C.-C., Wu, H.-S., Tseng, T.-C., Yang, C.-F. (2008). Rapid and Highly Sensitive Coxsackievirus A Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay Typing Kit for Enterovirus Serotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 785-788 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Leland, D. S., Ginocchio, C. C. (2007). Role of Cell Culture for Virus Detection in the Age of Technology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20: 49-78 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Perez-Ruiz, M., Navarro-Mari, J. M., Palacios del Valle, E., Rosa-Fraile, M. (2003). Human rhabdomyosarcoma cells for rapid detection of enteroviruses by shell-vial assay. J Med Microbiol 52: 789-791 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Huang, Y. T., Yam, P., Yan, H., Sun, Y. (2002). Engineered BGMK Cells for Sensitive and Rapid Detection of Enteroviruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 366-371 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lipson, S. M., David, K., Shaikh, F., Qian, L. (2001). Detection of Precytopathic Effect of Enteroviruses in Clinical Specimens by Centrifugation-Enhanced Antigen Detection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 2755-2759 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Luijt, D.S, Schirm, J, Savelkoul, P.H.M, Hoekstra, A (2001). Risk of infection by reprocessed and resterilized virus-contaminated catheters; an in-vitro study. Eur Heart J 22: 378-384 [Abstract]  
  • Muir, P., Kammerer, U., Korn, K., Mulders, M. N., Poyry, T., Weissbrich, B., Kandolf, R., Cleator, G. M., van Loon, A. M. (1998). Molecular Typing of Enteroviruses: Current Status and Future Requirements. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11: 202-227 [Abstract] [Full Text]