Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 07 1996, 1708-1710, Vol 34, No. 7
T Deguchi, M Yasuda, M Uno, K Tada, H Iwata, H Komeda, S Maeda, V Latila, I Saito and Y Kawada
We evaluated the performances of a ligase chain reaction (LCR)-based assay
and two enzyme immunoassays (Chlamydiazyme and IDEIA) in the detection of
Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens. We compared the results of
testing urine specimens by these assays with those of urethral swab culture
by examining samples from 131 men with nongonococcal urethritis. Discrepant
results were analyzed by testing urethral swab specimens for C. trachomatis
by a PCR-based assay. After the resolution of discrepant results, the
sensitivity of urethral swab culture was 85.3%, whereas those of the LCR
assay, Chlamydiazyme, and IDEIA with urine specimens were 94.1, 82.4, and
94.1%, respectively. The LCR assay and IDEIA were more sensitive than was
urethral swab culture. In addition, the LCR assay, with a sensitivity equal
to that of IDEIA, was more specific. Overall, the LCR assay proved to be
superior to the enzyme immunoassays in detecting C. trachomatis in urine
specimens. Testing urine specimens by LCR assay should be a helpful
alternative method for diagnosing C. trachomatis urethral infection in men
with nongonococcal urethritis.
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison among performances of a ligase chain reaction-based assay and two enzyme immunoassays in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men with nongonococcal urethritis
Department of Urology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Japan.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»