This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwen, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hinrichs, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iwen, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hinrichs, S. H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Jul 1996, 1779-1783, Vol 34, No. 7
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Revised approach for identification and detection of ampicillin and vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus species by using MicroScan panels

PC Iwen, DM Kelly, J Linder and SH Hinrichs
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198-6495, USA.

The frequency of antimicrobial agent-resistant enterococci is increasing, making accurate identification and screening for susceptibility essential. We evaluated the ability of MicroScan Positive Breakpoint Combo Type 6 panels (Dade MicroScan Inc., West Sacramento, Calif.) to identify Enterococcus species and to detect ampicillin and vancomycin resistance. A total of 398 well-characterized Enterococcus isolates from two institutions were inoculated into MicroScan panels, into conventional biochemical assays, and into ampicillin and vancomycin agar dilution media. Resistance was verified by the broth macrodilution method. MicroScan panels accurately detected resistance to ampicillin in 132 of 132 enterococcal isolates, while three isolates for which the MICs were < 16 micrograms/ml were classified incorrectly by MicroScan panels as resistant. No beta- lactamase-producing enterococci were detected. All 64 isolates showing resistance to vancomycin (MICs > or = 32 micrograms/ml) were correctly classified by MicroScan panels. Seven isolates for which the vancomycin MICs were 8 and 16 micrograms/ml were incorrectly classified as susceptible by MicroScan panels, while eight isolates for which the MICs were 4 micrograms/ml were incorrectly labeled as intermediate. Fourteen of these 15 isolates were subsequently identified as motile enterococci. Overall, there were three major errors in susceptibility testing for ampicillin and 15 minor errors for vancomycin. Conventional testing confirmed the identity of 181 Enterococcus faecalis isolates, 157 E. faecium isolates, and 60 isolates of other species; however, 56 of these 60 isolates were misidentified by the MicroScan panels. After recognition of this problem, a revised approach which included tests for pigment, motility, and sucrose fermentation was devised. In combination with these additional assays, the conventional MicroScan panels accurately identified the 56 originally misidentified isolates. In summary, the ability of MicroScan panels to detect vancomycin and ampicillin resistance in enterococci was confirmed. Our study found that the inability of MicroScan panels to identify enterococci other than E. faecalis and E. faecium can be compensated for by the addition of standard assays.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Van Horn, K., Toth, C., Kariyama, R., Mitsuhata, R., Kumon, H. (2002). Evaluation of 15 Motility Media and a Direct Microscopic Method for Detection of Motility in Enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2476-2479 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dargere, S., Vergnaud, M., Verdon, R., Saloux, E., Le Page, O., Leclercq, R., Bazin, C. (2002). Enterococcus gallinarum Endocarditis Occurring on Native Heart Valves. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2308-2310 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kirschner, C., Maquelin, K., Pina, P., Ngo Thi, N. A., Choo-Smith, L.-P., Sockalingum, G. D., Sandt, C., Ami, D., Orsini, F., Doglia, S. M., Allouch, P., Mainfait, M., Puppels, G. J., Naumann, D. (2001). Classification and Identification of Enterococci: a Comparative Phenotypic, Genotypic, and Vibrational Spectroscopic Study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 1763-1770 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Goh, S. H., Facklam, R. R., Chang, M., Hill, J. E., Tyrrell, G. J., Burns, E. C. M., Chan, D., He, C., Rahim, T., Shaw, C., Hemmingsen, S. M. (2000). Identification of Enterococcus Species and Phenotypically Similar Lactococcus and Vagococcus Species by Reverse Checkerboard Hybridization to Chaperonin 60 Gene Sequences. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 3953-3959 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Poyart, C., Quesnes, G., Trieu-Cuot, P. (2000). Sequencing the Gene Encoding Manganese-Dependent Superoxide Dismutase for Rapid Species Identification of Enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 415-418 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Iwen, P. C., Rupp, M. E., Schreckenberger, P. C., Hinrichs, S. H. (1999). Evaluation of the Revised MicroScan Dried Overnight Gram-Positive Identification Panel To Identify Enterococcus Species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3756-3758 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hanson, K. L., Cartwright, C. P. (1999). Comparison of Simple and Rapid Methods for Identifying Enterococci Intrinsically Resistant to Vancomycin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 815-817 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Carvalho, M. D. G. S., Teixeira, L. M., Facklam, R. R. (1998). Use of Tests for Acidification of Methyl-alpha -D-Glucopyranoside and Susceptibility to Efrotomycin for Differentiation of Strains of Enterococcus and Some Related Genera. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 1584-1587 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»