This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berrouane, Y. F.
Right arrow Articles by Pfaller, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berrouane, Y. F.
Right arrow Articles by Pfaller, M. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 07 1996, 1856-1858, Vol 34, No. 7
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Strain variation among and antifungal susceptibilities of isolates of Candida krusei

YF Berrouane, RJ Hollis and MA Pfaller
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242, USA.

Candida krusei is an emerging pathogen that is well known for its propensity to develop resistance to fluconazole and other azoles. Despite the potential clinical significance of C. krusei, little is known of its epidemiology and genetic diversity as defined by the newer DNA-based typing methods. We investigated the genotypic diversity and antifungal susceptibility of 67 clinical isolates from 44 patients and 5 health care workers from six different medical centers. Strain delineation was performed by restriction endonuclease analysis of genomic DNA (REAG) with the restriction enzyme HinfI followed by conventional electrophoresis. The susceptibility of the isolates to the antifungal agents amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, and itraconazole was determined by methods recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. The MICs at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited ranged from 1.0 microgram/ml for itraconazole to 64 micrograms/ml for fluconazole. In general, isolates from a given patient, or epidemiologically related isolates from a single institution, were identical by molecular typing methods. Epidemiologically unrelated isolates were distinctly different by the REAG typing method employed. These data document the genetic diversity and antifungal susceptibility of clinical isolates of C. krusei.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Gibbs, D. L., Newell, V. A., Nagy, E., Dobiasova, S., Rinaldi, M., Barton, R., Veselov, A., the Global Antifungal Surveillance Group, (2008). Candida krusei, a Multidrug-Resistant Opportunistic Fungal Pathogen: Geographic and Temporal Trends from the ARTEMIS DISK Antifungal Surveillance Program, 2001 to 2005. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 515-521 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bagg, J., Sweeney, M P., Davies, A. N, Jackson, M. S, Brailsford, S. (2005). Voriconazole susceptibility of yeasts isolated from the mouths of patients with advanced cancer. J Med Microbiol 54: 959-964 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sancak, B., Rex, J. H., Chen, E., Marr, K. (2004). Comparison of PCR- and HinfI Restriction Endonuclease-Based Methods for Typing of Candida krusei Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5889-5891 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bagg, J, Sweeney, M P, Lewis, M A., Jackson, M S, Coleman, D, Mosaid, A A., Baxter, W, McEndrick, S, McHugh, S (2003). High prevalence of non-albicans yeasts and detection of anti-fungal resistance in the oral flora of patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Med 17: 477-481 [Abstract]  
  • Moran, G., Sullivan, D., Morschhauser, J., Coleman, D. (2002). The Candida dubliniensis CdCDR1 Gene Is Not Essential for Fluconazole Resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 2829-2841 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Raad, I. I., Hanna, H. A. (2002). Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections: New Horizons and Recent Advances. Arch Intern Med 162: 871-878 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Safdar, A., Chaturvedi, V., Cross, E. W., Park, S., Bernard, E. M., Armstrong, D., Perlin, D. S. (2001). Prospective Study of Candida Species in Patients at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 2129-2133 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Abbas, J., Bodey, G. P., Hanna, H. A., Mardani, M., Girgawy, E., Abi-Said, D., Whimbey, E., Hachem, R., Raad, I. (2000). Candida krusei Fungemia: An Escalating Serious Infection in Immunocompromised Patients. Arch Intern Med 160: 2659-2664 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Berrouane, Y. F., Herwaldt, L. A., Pfaller, M. A. (1999). Trends in Antifungal Use and Epidemiology of Nosocomial Yeast Infections in a University Hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 531-537 [Abstract] [Full Text]