This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Otal, I.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Otal, I.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 01 1997, 273-277, Vol 35, No. 1
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Use of a PCR method based on IS6110 polymorphism for typing Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from BACTEC cultures

I Otal, S Samper, MP Asensio, MA Vitoria, MC Rubio, R Gomez-Lus and C Martin
Departamento de Microbiologia, Medicina Preventiva, y Salud Publica, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain. otali@posta.unizar.es

Two PCR typing methods, based on polymorphism of the insertion sequence IS6110, were compared with Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains by using a single primer complementary to the inverted repeats of IS6110. Total M. tuberculosis DNA either was amplified directly (IS6110-PCR) or was amplified following digestion and ligation (IS6110-inverse-PCR). Both PCR techniques showed a similar degree of discrimination. Because of its simplicity, IS6110-PCR was chosen to confirm that a single M. tuberculosis strain was responsible for an outbreak of tuberculosis in a secondary school. IS6110-PCR was used to study the degree of differentiation in 85 clinical M. tuberculosis isolates from BACTEC 12B broth cultures. Results were consistent with those of the standardized IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis method, showing identical PCR types for identical RFLPs, although the degree of discrimination was greater by RFLP analysis. The study concludes that due to its simplicity, IS6110-PCR is a good screening method when quick differentiation between M. tuberculosis strains is needed because BACTEC cultures may be used directly.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kremer, K., Arnold, C., Cataldi, A., Gutierrez, M. C., Haas, W. H., Panaiotov, S., Skuce, R. A., Supply, P., van der Zanden, A. G. M., van Soolingen, D. (2005). Discriminatory Power and Reproducibility of Novel DNA Typing Methods for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 5628-5638 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Suzuki, M., Matsumoto, M., Hata, M., Takahashi, M., Sakae, K. (2004). Development of a Rapid PCR Method Using the Insertion Sequence IS1203 for Genotyping Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli O157. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5462-5466 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kotlowski, R., Shamputa, I. C., El Aila, N. A., Sajduda, A., Rigouts, L., van Deun, A., Portaels, F. (2004). PCR-Based Genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with New GC-Rich Repeated Sequences and IS6110 Inverted Repeats Used as Primers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 372-377 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Millemann, Y., Gaubert, S., Remy, D., Colmin, C. (2000). Evaluation of IS200-PCR and Comparison with Other Molecular Markers To Trace Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serotype Typhimurium Bovine Isolates from Farm to Meat. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 2204-2209 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kremer, K., van Soolingen, D., Frothingham, R., Haas, W. H., Hermans, P. W. M., Martín, C., Palittapongarnpim, P., Plikaytis, B. B., Riley, L. W., Yakrus, M. A., Musser, J. M., van Embden, J. D. A. (1999). Comparison of Methods Based on Different Molecular Epidemiological Markers for Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Strains: Interlaboratory Study of Discriminatory Power and Reproducibility. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 2607-2618 [Abstract] [Full Text]