This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lyamuya, E.
Right arrow Articles by Biberfeld, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lyamuya, E.
Right arrow Articles by Biberfeld, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Jan 1997, 278-280, Vol 35, No. 1
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of in-house and commercial sample preparation and PCR amplification systems for detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 DNA in blood samples from Tanzanian adults

E Lyamuya, U Bredberg-Raden, J Albert, O Grankvist, V Msangi, C Kagoma, F Mhalu and G Biberfeld
Department of Microbiology/Immunology, Muhimbili University College of Health Sciences, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

This study compared the performance of several in-house nested PCR systems and the Amplicor human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) PCR kit in the detection of HIV-1 DNA in Tanzanian samples prepared by two different methods. All six of the in-house primer sets evaluated had a higher sensitivity for HIV DNA detection in samples prepared by the Amplicor PCR sample preparation method than in those prepared by the Ficoll-Isopaque (FIP) density gradient centrifugation method. A sensitivity of 100% was achieved by combining two in-house primer sets. The sensitivity of the standard Amplicor HIV-1 PCR kit was only 59%, whereas a modified Amplicor HIV-1 PCR test had a sensitivity of 98%. Our data show that Tanzanian samples prepared by the Amplicor preparation method are more suitable for HIV-1 PCR testing than samples prepared by the FIP method. The modified, but not the standard, Amplicor HIV-1 PCR kit provides an alternative to the nested in-house PCR technique for the diagnosis of HIV infection.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Spetz, A.-L., Sorensen, A. S., Walther-Jallow, L., Wahren, B., Andersson, J., Holmgren, L., Hinkula, J. (2002). Induction of HIV-1-Specific Immunity After Vaccination with Apoptotic HIV-1/Murine Leukemia Virus-Infected Cells. J. Immunol. 169: 5771-5779 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tscherning-Casper, C., Papadogiannakis, N., Anvret, M., Stolpe, L., Lindgren, S., Bohlin, A. B., Albert, J., Fenyo, E. M. (1999). The Trophoblastic Epithelial Barrier Is Not Infected in Full-Term Placentae of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Seropositive Mothers Undergoing Antiretroviral Therapy. J. Virol. 73: 9673-9678 [Abstract] [Full Text]