This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Biedenbach, D. J. Articles by Jones, R. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Biedenbach, D. J. Articles by Jones, R. N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 12 1997, 3198-3202, Vol 35, No. 12
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Disk diffusion test interpretive criteria and quality control recommendations for testing linezolid (U-100766) and eperezolid (U- 100592) with commercially prepared reagents [In Process Citation]

DJ Biedenbach and RN Jones
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242, USA.

Two new oxazolidinones were tested to determine interpretive susceptibility testing criteria for MIC and disk diffusion methods. Commercial lots of linezolid (formerly U-100766) and eperezolid (formerly U-100592) disks containing 30 microg of drug were tested against 728 isolates of bacteria with defined mechanisms of resistance. Results from linezolid were highlighted because of its choice for clinical development. By using preliminary pharmacokinetic data, a tentative susceptibility breakpoint of < or = 4 microg/ml was selected. Corresponding breakpoint zone diameters for linezolid were > or = 21 mm (< or = 4 microg/ml) for susceptibility and < or = 17 mm (> or = 16 microg/ml) for resistance. Regression statistics demonstrated a high correlation coefficient (r > or = 0.98), and absolute categorical agreement between methods was obtained, when staphylococci and enterococci were tested with the cited criteria. When Streptococcus spp. (including S. pneumoniae) were tested, only the susceptibility breakpoint was suggested. Quality control (QC) guidelines for linezolid disk diffusion tests were established by a multilaboratory trial as follows: 27 to 31 mm for Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and 28 to 34 mm for S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619. More than 95% of all QC results were within these proposed ranges. Although not advanced to clinical trials, eperezolid demonstrated potency comparable to that of linezolid and had identical interpretive testing criteria. These preliminary interpretive criteria and QC limits (accepted by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) should be applied to linezolid tests during the clinical-trial phases of oxazolidinone drug development in order to ensure test accuracy and reproducibility.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Anderegg, T. R., Biedenbach, D. J., Jones, R. N. (2002). In Vitro Evaluation of AZD2563, a Novel Oxazolidinone, against 603 Recent Staphylococcal Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 2662-2664 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pelaez, T., Alonso, R., Perez, C., Alcala, L., Cuevas, O., Bouza, E. (2002). In Vitro Activity of Linezolid against Clostridium difficile. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 1617-1618 [Abstract] [Full Text]