This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by de la Maza, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by de la Maza, L. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 04 1997, 957-959, Vol 35, No. 4
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Reproducibility problems with the AMPLICOR PCR Chlamydia trachomatis test

EM Peterson, V Darrow, J Blanding, S Aarnaes and LM de la Maza
Department of Pathology, University of California, Irvine, Orange 92868- 3298, USA.

In an attempt to use an expanded "gold standard" in an evaluation of an antigen detection test for Chlamydia trachomatis, the AMPLICOR (Roche Diagnostics Systems, Inc., Branchburg, N.J.) PCR Chlamydia trachomatis test and culture were used with 591 sets of cervical specimens. Of the 591 specimens assayed, 35 were retested due to either an equivocal result by the PCR (19 samples) or a discrepancy between the results of culture, PCR, and the antigen detection method. During the repeat testing of the samples with equivocal and discrepant results, all but one interpretation change was due to the PCR result. In addition, upon repeat testing the PCR assay value measured in optical density units varied widely for 13 of these specimens. These 13 specimens were then tested in triplicate by the manufacturer with primers to the chlamydia plasmid and in duplicate with primers to the major outer membrane protein. Only 3 of the 13 specimens gave the same interpretation with these five replicates. In summary, reproducibility problems with the AMPLICOR test should be considered before it is incorporated as part of routine testing or used as an expanded gold standard for chlamydia testing.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Munson, E., Boyd, V., Czarnecka, J., Griep, J., Lund, B., Schaal, N., Hryciuk, J. E. (2007). Evaluation of Gen-Probe APTIMA-Based Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis Confirmatory Testing in a Metropolitan Setting of High Disease Prevalence. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2793-2797 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Schachter, J., Chow, J. M., Howard, H., Bolan, G., Moncada, J. (2006). Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing: Our Evaluation Suggests that CDC-Recommended Approaches for Confirmatory Testing Are Ill-Advised.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 2512-2517 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jalal, H, Stephen, H, Al-Suwaine, A, Sonnex, C, Carne, C (2006). The superiority of polymerase chain reaction over an amplified enzyme immunoassay for the detection of genital chlamydial infections. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 37-40 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jalal, H., Stephen, H., Curran, M. D., Burton, J., Bradley, M., Carne, C. (2006). Development and Validation of a Rotor-Gene Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection, Identification, and Quantification of Chlamydia trachomatis in a Single Reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 206-213 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rours, G. I. J. G., Verkooyen, R. P., Willemse, H. F. M., van der Zwaan, E. A. E., van Belkum, A., de Groot, R., Verbrugh, H. A., Ossewaarde, J. M. (2005). Use of Pooled Urine Samples and Automated DNA Isolation To Achieve Improved Sensitivity and Cost-Effectiveness of Large-Scale Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in Pregnant Women. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 4684-4690 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ikeda-Dantsuji, Y., Konomi, I., Nagayama, A. (2005). In vitro assessment of the APTIMA Combo 2 assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis using highly purified elementary bodies. J Med Microbiol 54: 357-360 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Schachter, J., Hook, E. W., Martin, D. H., Willis, D., Fine, P., Fuller, D., Jordan, J., Janda, W. M., Chernesky, M. (2005). Confirming Positive Results of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) for Chlamydia trachomatis: All NAATs Are Not Created Equal. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 1372-1373 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Solomon, A. W., Peeling, R. W., Foster, A., Mabey, D. C. W. (2004). Diagnosis and Assessment of Trachoma. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17: 982-1011 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Culler, E. E., Caliendo, A. M., Nolte, F. S. (2003). Reproducibility of Positive Test Results in the BDProbeTec ET System for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3911-3914 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Castriciano, S., Luinstra, K., Jang, D., Patel, J., Mahony, J., Kapala, J., Chernesky, M. (2002). Accuracy of Results Obtained by Performing a Second Ligase Chain Reaction Assay and PCR Analysis on Urine Samples with Positive or Near-Cutoff Results in the LCx Test for Chlamydia trachomatis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2632-2634 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mallinson, H, Hopwood, J, Mutton, K (2002). Resolution of the recent performance problem of Abbott LCx Chlamydia trachomatis assay. Issues of repeat testing for confirmation of chlamydial infection. Sex. Transm. Infect. 78 : 225-226 [Full Text]  
  • Hammerschlag, M. R (2001). Use of nucleic acid amplification tests in investigating child sexual abuse. Sex. Transm. Infect. 77: 153-154 [Full Text]  
  • Van Dyck, E., Ieven, M., Pattyn, S., Van Damme, L., Laga, M. (2001). Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by Enzyme Immunoassay, Culture, and Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 1751-1756 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • van Doornum, G. J. J., Schouls, L. M., Pijl, A., Cairo, I., Buimer, M., Bruisten, S. (2001). Comparison between the LCx Probe System and the COBAS AMPLICOR System for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections in Patients Attending a Clinic for Treatment of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 829-835 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gronowski, A. M., Copper, S., Baorto, D., Murray, P. R. (2000). Reproducibility Problems with the Abbott Laboratories LCx Assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 2416-2418 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mulcahy, G. M., Albanese, E. A., Bachl, B. L. (1998). Reproducibility of the Roche Amplicor Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of Infection by Chlamydia trachomatis in Endocervical Specimens. Clin. Chem. 44: 1575-1578 [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»