Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 09 1997, 2252-2255, Vol 35, No. 9
MM Durkin, PA Connolly and LJ Wheat
The purpose of this study was to compare the conventional radioimmunoassay
(RIA) to an enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) for the measurement of
Histoplasma antigen in banked urine specimens. A correlation between the
two methods would allow the EIA to be used as a nonradioactive alternative
to the established 125I RIA. The study used stored urine from patients
diagnosed with histoplasmosis during an outbreak in Indianapolis which
began in 1988. Control specimens from healthy adults, patients with other
fungal infections, urinary tract infections, or nonfungal pneumonia were
also tested. Both the RIA and EIA were run concurrently. The RIA system
measured antigen levels of 0.4 to 27.0 RIA units, while the EIA measured
antigen levels of 0.6 to 20.1 units. Both the EIA and RIA detected
measurable antigen levels in urine from 50 of 56 patients (89%) with
disseminated disease and 11 of 30 patients (37%) with self-limiting
disease. One of 96 control specimens, from a patient with
paracoccidioidomycosis, was positive with both systems. Antigen levels
measured by EIA correlated well with those measured by the established RIA
method (correlation coefficient, 0.974). The EIA is an acceptable
alternative to the RIA for measuring Histoplasma antigen levels in urine
specimens.
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunoassay methods for detection of Histoplasma capsulatum var. capsulatum antigen
Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46262, USA. MDURKIN@MDEP.IUPUI.EDU
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»