This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lyerly, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwalbe, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lyerly, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwalbe, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 1998, p. 184-190, Vol. 36, No. 1
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Multicenter Evaluation of the Clostridium difficile TOX A/B TEST

D. M. Lyerly,1,* L. M. Neville,1 D. T. Evans,1 J. Fill,2 S. Allen,2 W. Greene,3 R. Sautter,4 P. Hnatuck,4 D. J. Torpey,5 and R. Schwalbe5

TechLab, Inc., Corporate Research Center, Blacksburg, Virginia 240601; Anaerobe Laboratory, Indiana University Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana 462022; Clinical Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 170333; Department of Microbiology, PinnacleHealth System, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105-87004; and Department of Medical and Research Technology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201-10825

Received 3 July 1997/Returned for modification 8 September 1997/Accepted 8 October 1997

Clostridium difficile, the primary cause of nosocomial diarrhea in the United States and many other industrialized countries, is recognized as a major health concern because of its ability to cause severe intestinal disease leading to complications such as relapses and infections due to vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The disease results from two toxins, toxins A and B, produced by this pathogen. In this study, we evaluated the TOX A/B TEST, a new 1-h enzyme immunoassay (EIA) that detects toxins A and B. We compared the test with the tissue culture assay, which is recognized as the "gold standard" for C. difficile testing. Evaluations were performed in-house at TechLab, Inc. (Blacksburg, Va.) and off-site at four clinical laboratories. Of 1,152 specimens tested, 165 were positive by the TOX A/B TEST and tissue culture and 973 were negative by both tests. The sensitivity and specificity were 92.2 and 100%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 100 and 98.6%, respectively, and the correlation of the TOX A/B TEST with tissue culture was 98.8%. When discrepant samples were resolved by culture, the sensitivity and specificity were 93.2 and 98.9%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 100 and 98.8%, respectively, with a correlation of 99.0%. There were no specimens that were positive by the TOX A/B TEST and negative by tissue culture. Fourteen specimens were negative by the TOX A/B TEST but positive by tissue culture. Of these, two were negative by toxigenic culture, five were positive by toxigenic culture, and seven were not available for further testing. There were no indeterminate results, since the test does not have an indeterminant zone. In a separate study, 102 specimens that were positive by tissue culture and the TOX A/B TEST were examined in toxin A-specific EIAs. Two specimens that presumptively contained toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive (toxA-/toxB+) isolates were identified. One specimen was from a patient with a clinical history consistent with C. difficile infection. Isolates obtained from these specimens by selective culture on solid media and in broth tested toxA-/toxB+ when grown in brain heart infusion dialysis flasks, which stimulate in vitro production of both toxins. Our findings show that the TOX A/B TEST is suitable as a diagnostic aid for C. difficile disease because it correlates well with tissue culture and detects isolates that may be missed with toxin A-specific EIAs.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: TechLab, Inc., 1861 Pratt Dr., Corporate Research Center, Blacksburg, VA 24060. Phone: (540) 231-3943. Fax: (540) 231-3942. E-mail: techlab{at}bev.net.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 1998, p. 184-190, Vol. 36, No. 1
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Shin, B.-M., Kuak, E. Y., Lee, E. J., Songer, J. G. (2009). Algorithm Combining Toxin Immunoassay and Stool Culture for Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 2952-2956 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stamper, P. D., Alcabasa, R., Aird, D., Babiker, W., Wehrlin, J., Ikpeama, I., Carroll, K. C. (2009). Comparison of a Commercial Real-Time PCR Assay for tcdB Detection to a Cell Culture Cytotoxicity Assay and Toxigenic Culture for Direct Detection of Toxin-Producing Clostridium difficile in Clinical Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 373-378 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • She, R. C., Durrant, R. J., Petti, C. A. (2009). Evaluation of Enzyme Immunoassays to Detect Clostridium difficile Toxin From Anaerobic Stool Culture. Am J Clin Pathol 131: 81-84 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shin, B.-M., Kuak, E. Y., Yoo, H. M., Kim, E. C., Lee, K., Kang, J.-O., Whang, D. H., Shin, J.-H. (2008). Multicentre study of the prevalence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Korea: results of a retrospective study 2000-2005. J Med Microbiol 57: 697-701 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Musher, D. M., Manhas, A., Jain, P., Nuila, F., Waqar, A., Logan, N., Marino, B., Graviss, E. A. (2007). Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxin: Comparison of Enzyme Immunoassay Results with Results Obtained by Cytotoxicity Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2737-2739 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Keel, M. K., Songer, J. G. (2006). The Comparative Pathology of Clostridium difficile-associated Disease. Vet Pathol 43: 225-240 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ticehurst, J. R., Aird, D. Z., Dam, L. M., Borek, A. P., Hargrove, J. T., Carroll, K. C. (2006). Effective Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a Two-Step Algorithm Including Tests for Antigen and Cytotoxin.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 1145-1149 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kato, H., Yokoyama, T., Kato, H., Arakawa, Y. (2005). Rapid and Simple Method for Detecting the Toxin B Gene of Clostridium difficile in Stool Specimens by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 6108-6112 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lemee, L., Bourgeois, I., Ruffin, E., Collignon, A., Lemeland, J.-F., Pons, J.-L. (2005). Multilocus sequence analysis and comparative evolution of virulence-associated genes and housekeeping genes of Clostridium difficile. Microbiology 151: 3171-3180 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lemee, L., Dhalluin, A., Testelin, S., Mattrat, M.-A., Maillard, K., Lemeland, J.-F., Pons, J.-L. (2004). Multiplex PCR Targeting tpi (Triose Phosphate Isomerase), tcdA (Toxin A), and tcdB (Toxin B) Genes for Toxigenic Culture of Clostridium difficile. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5710-5714 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Geric, B., Rupnik, M., Gerding, D. N., Grabnar, M., Johnson, S. (2004). Distribution of Clostridium difficile variant toxinotypes and strains with binary toxin genes among clinical isolates in an American hospital. J Med Microbiol 53: 887-894 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • O'Connor, K.A., Kingston, M., O'Donovan, M., Cryan, B., Twomey, C., O'Mahony, D. (2004). Antibiotic prescribing policy and Clostridium difficile diarrhoea. QJM 97: 423-429 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lemee, L., Dhalluin, A., Pestel-Caron, M., Lemeland, J.-F., Pons, J.-L. (2004). Multilocus Sequence Typing Analysis of Human and Animal Clostridium difficile Isolates of Various Toxigenic Types. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 2609-2617 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Johnson, S., Sambol, S. P., Brazier, J. S., Delmee, M., Avesani, V., Merrigan, M. M., Gerding, D. N. (2003). International Typing Study of Toxin A-Negative, Toxin B-Positive Clostridium difficile Variants. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 1543-1547 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Barbut, F., Lalande, V., Burghoffer, B., Thien, H. V., Grimprel, E., Petit, J.-C. (2002). Prevalence and Genetic Characterization of Toxin A Variant Strains of Clostridium difficile among Adults and Children with Diarrhea in France. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2079-2083 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • O'Connor, D., Hynes, P., Cormican, M., Collins, E., Corbett-Feeney, G., Cassidy, M. (2001). Evaluation of Methods for Detection of Toxins in Specimens of Feces Submitted for Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile- Associated Diarrhea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 2846-2849 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Landry, M. L., Topal, J., Ferguson, D., Giudetti, D., Tang, Y. (2001). Evaluation of Biosite Triage Clostridium difficile Panel for Rapid Detection of Clostridium difficile in Stool Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 1855-1858 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lozniewski, A., Rabaud, C., Dotto, E., Weber, M., Mory, F. (2001). Laboratory Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea and Colitis: Usefulness of Premier Cytoclone A+B Enzyme Immunoassay for Combined Detection of Stool Toxins and Toxigenic C. difficile Strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 1996-1998 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Limaye, A. P., Turgeon, D. K., Cookson, B. T., Fritsche, T. R. (2000). Pseudomembranous Colitis Caused by a Toxin A- B+ Strain of Clostridium difficile. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 1696-1697 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kato, H., Kato, N., Watanabe, K., Iwai, N., Nakamura, H., Yamamoto, T., Suzuki, K., Kim, S.-M., Chong, Y., Wasito, E. B. (1998). Identification of Toxin A-Negative, Toxin B-Positive Clostridium difficile by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 2178-2182 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»