Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1998, p. 3173-3177, Vol. 36, No. 11
Respiratory and Systemic Infection
Laboratory,
Received 1 May 1998/Returned for modification 1 July 1998/Accepted 2 August 1998
We have compared molecular, immunochemical, and cytotoxic assays
for the detection of diphtheria toxin from 55 isolates of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium
ulcerans originally isolated in five different countries. The
suitabilities and accuracies of these assays for the laboratory
diagnosis of diphtheria were compared and evaluated against the "gold
standard" in vivo methods. The in vivo and Vero cell cytotoxicity
assays were accurate in their abilities to detect diphtheria toxin but
were time-consuming; however, the cytotoxicity assay is a
suitable in vitro alternative to the in vivo virulence test. There was
complete concordance between all the phenotypic methods. Genotypic
tests based upon PCR were rapid; however, PCR must be used with caution
because some isolates of C. diphtheriae possessed
toxin genes but failed to express a biologically active toxin.
Therefore, phenotypic confirmation of toxigenicity for the
microbiological diagnosis of diphtheria is recommended.
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for Detection of
Diphtheria Toxin among Isolates of Pathogenic Corynebacteria
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: PHLS/WHO
Streptococcus and Diphtheria Reference Unit, Respiratory and Systemic
Infection Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, 61 Colindale
Ave., London NW9 5HT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 181 200 4400. Fax: 44 181 205 6528. E-mail: aefstratiou{at}phls.co.uk.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1998, p. 3173-3177, Vol. 36, No. 11
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»