Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1998, p. 3366-3368, Vol. 36, No. 11
Institute of Microbiology,
Received 3 April 1998/Returned for modification 2 June
1998/Accepted 18 August 1998
Of four tested identification systems (API 20E, API Rapid 32 IDE,
Micronaut E, and the PCR-based Yersinia enterocolitica
Amplification Set), API 20E is still the system of choice for
identifying pathogenic Yersinia isolates. It
provides the highest sensitivity both at the genus and at the species
level and has the best cost-effectiveness correlation.
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of Systems for Identification and
Differentiation of Species within the Genus
Yersinia
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut
für Mikrobiologie, Sanitätsakademie der Bundeswehr,
Neuherbergstr. 11, D-80937 Munich, Germany. Phone: 49-89-3168-3113. Fax: 49-89-3168-3829. E-mail: 320027945810{at}t-online.de.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1998, p. 3366-3368, Vol. 36, No. 11
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»