This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wendt, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rüden, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wendt, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rüden, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1998, p. 3734-3736, Vol. 36, No. 12
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Survival of Vancomycin-Resistant and Vancomycin-Susceptible Enterococci on Dry Surfaces

Constanze Wendt,1,* Bettina Wiesenthal,1 Ekkehart Dietz,2 and Henning Rüden1

Institute of Hygiene, Free University Berlin, 12203 Berlin,1 and Institute of Social Medicine, Working Group Epidemiology, Free University Berlin, 14195 Berlin,2 Germany

Received 15 June 1998/Returned for modification 6 August 1998/Accepted 7 September 1998

We compared the abilities of Enterococcus faecium strains (three vancomycin-resistant enterococci [VRE] and five vancomycin-susceptible enterococci [VSE]) and Enterococcus faecalis strains (one VRE and 10 VSE) to survive under dry conditions. Bacterial suspensions of the strains were inoculated onto polyvinyl chloride and stored under defined conditions for up to 16 weeks. All strains survived for at least 1 week, and two strains survived for 4 months. A statistical model was used to distribute the 19 resulting survival curves between two types of survival curves. The type of survival curve was not associated with the species (E. faecalis versus E. faecium), the source of isolation (patient versus environment), or the susceptibility to vancomycin (VRE versus VSE). Resistance to dry conditions may promote the transmissibility of a strain, but VRE have no advantages over VSE with respect to their ability to survive under dry conditions.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Hygiene, Free University Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany. Phone: (030) 8445 3680. Fax: (030) 8445 3682. E-mail: T.Wendt{at}TBX.BerliNet.de.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1998, p. 3734-3736, Vol. 36, No. 12
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ramadhan, A A, Hegedus, E (2005). Survivability of vancomycin resistant enterococci and fitness cost of vancomycin resistance acquisition. J. Clin. Pathol. 58: 744-746 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kampf, G., Kramer, A. (2004). Epidemiologic Background of Hand Hygiene and Evaluation of the Most Important Agents for Scrubs and Rubs. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17: 863-893 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Martinez, J. A., Ruthazer, R., Hansjosten, K., Barefoot, L., Snydman, D. R. (2003). Role of Environmental Contamination as a Risk Factor for Acquisition of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in Patients Treated in a Medical Intensive Care Unit. Arch Intern Med 163: 1905-1912 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lund, B., Agvald-Ohman, C., Hultberg, A., Edlund, C. (2002). Frequent Transmission of Enterococcal Strains between Mechanically Ventilated Patients Treated at an Intensive Care Unit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2084-2088 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dancer, S. J. (2001). The problem with cephalosporins. J Antimicrob Chemother 48: 463-478 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Neely, A. N., Maley, M. P. (2000). Survival of Enterococci and Staphylococci on Hospital Fabrics and Plastic. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 724-726 [Abstract] [Full Text]