Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 1998, p. 628-633, Vol. 36, No. 3
Department of New Technologies, Laboratory
Systems, Boehringer-Mannheim GmbH, D-82372 Penzberg, Germany
Received 7 July 1997/Returned for modification 3 October
1997/Accepted 18 November 1997
Four different standardization approaches based on a competitive
reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay were compared with a noncompetitive assay based on an external standard curve. Criteria for
assessment were accuracy in quantitation, correctness of recovery, sensitivity, dynamic range, reproducibility, throughput, and
convenience of sample handling. As a model system, we used the
5'-noncoding region of hepatitis C virus (HCV) for amplification in all
quantitative RT-PCRs. A computer program that allowed parallel data
processing was developed. Surprisingly, all methods were found suitable
for accurate quantitation and comparable with respect to the criterion correctness of recovery. All results differed only by a factor of about
2. The reason for this finding might be that all of our mimics, as well
as the wild-type genome of HCV, exhibited exactly the same
amplification and hybridization efficacy. Moreover, minimal competition
occurred in our experiments over a 5-log dynamic range. A further topic
of our investigation was the comparison of two different competitive
RNA fragments, mimics, with regard to their suitability as internal
standards. One was a heterologous mimic, in which only the primer
binding sites were identical to the wild type. The second one was a
homologous mimic identical to the wild type except for a small region
used for differential hybridization, which was replaced by a permutated
sequence of the same length. Both the homologous and heterologous
internal mimics were found appropriate for an accurate competitive
RT-PCR assay, provided that amplification efficacy, as well as capture
efficacy, is proven identical for both analyte and mimic.
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparative Study of Different Standardization
Concepts in Quantitative Competitive Reverse Transcription-PCR
Assays
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address:
Boehringer-Mannheim GmbH, Department LP-DN, Nonnenwald 2, D-82372
Penzberg, Germany. Phone: 49 8856 602666. Fax: 49 8856 602819. E-mail:
gerd_haberhausen{at}bmg.boehringer-mannheim.com.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»