This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puolakkainen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Paavonen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Puolakkainen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Paavonen, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 1998, p. 1489-1493, Vol. 36, No. 6
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of Performances of Two Commercially Available Tests, a PCR Assay and a Ligase Chain Reaction Test, in Detection of Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Infection

Mirja Puolakkainen,1,* Eija Hiltunen-Back,2 Timo Reunala,2 Satu Suhonen,3 Pekka Lähteenmäki,3 Matti Lehtinen,4 and Jorma Paavonen5

Haartman Institute, Department of Virology,1 and Departments of Dermatology and Venereology2 and Obstetrics and Gynecology,5 University of Helsinki, Family Federation of Finland,3 and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, National Public Health Institute,4 Helsinki, Finland

Received 23 September 1997/Returned for modification 16 January 1998/Accepted 19 February 1998

The diagnostic performance of a PCR test (Roche Cobas Amplicor CT/NG Test) and that of a ligase chain reaction (LCR) test (Abbott LCx Chlamydia trachomatis assay) were compared by using endocervical and urethral swab specimen culture as a reference test. First-void urine (FVU) and endocervical and urethral swab specimens were collected from 1,015 unselected patients attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic and a clinic for adolescents in Helsinki, Finland. Chlamydia trachomatis was cultured from samples from the endocervix or urethra. PCR was performed with fresh and frozen urine and the culture transport medium. LCR was performed with fresh and frozen urine and LCx swab transport medium. Diagnostic consistency and diagnostic accuracy were statistically tested. The test results were identical for 984 patients (97%). Discrepant results were observed for 31 patients. Overall, LCR and PCR showed excellent kappa coefficients of consistency for both swab and FVU specimens (0.93 and 0.95, respectively). Sixty-one patients (6%) were culture positive. Testing of FVU by LCR or PCR increased the overall positivity rates to 7.0 and 7.7%, respectively. While PCR of FVU detected the greatest number of C. trachomatis infections (sensitivity, 96.1%), for some PCR-positive FVU specimens the results could not be confirmed (specificity, 99.6%). PCR and LCR were more sensitive than culture (sensitivities, 92 and 93% versus 79% for culture) in the diagnosis of genital C. trachomatis infection. In conclusion, both tests can be recommended for use in the clinical laboratory and for the screening of asymptomatic C. trachomatis infections.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Haartman Institute, Department of Virology, P.O. Box 21, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Phone: 358-9-43461. Fax: 358-9-4346491. E-mail: Mirja.Puolakkainen{at}Helsinki.fi.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 1998, p. 1489-1493, Vol. 36, No. 6
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Land, J.A., Van Bergen, J.E.A.M., Morre, S.A., Postma, M.J. (2009). Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and the cost-effectiveness of screening. Hum Reprod Update 0: dmp035v1-dmp035 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Burckhardt, F, Warner, P, Young, H (2006). What is the impact of change in diagnostic test method on surveillance data trends in Chlamydia trachomatis infection?. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 24-30 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cook, R. L., Hutchison, S. L., Ostergaard, L., Braithwaite, R. S., Ness, R. B. (2005). Systematic Review: Noninvasive Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. ANN INTERN MED 142: 914-925 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lister, N. A., Tabrizi, S. N., Fairley, C. K., Garland, S. (2004). Validation of Roche COBAS Amplicor Assay for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Rectal and Pharyngeal Specimens by an omp1 PCR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 239-241 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mrus, J. M., Biro, F. M., Huang, B., Tsevat, J. (2003). Evaluating Adolescents in Juvenile Detention Facilities for Urogenital Chlamydial Infection: Costs and Effectiveness of Alternative Interventions. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157: 696-702 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • WATSON, E. J., TEMPLETON, A., RUSSELL, I., PAAVONEN, J., MARDH, P.-A., STARY, A., PEDERSON, B. S. (2002). The accuracy and efficacy of screening tests for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review. J Med Microbiol 51: 1021-1031 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Diemert, D. J., Libman, M. D., Lebel, P. (2002). Confirmation by 16S rRNA PCR of the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infection in a Low-Prevalence Population. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 4056-4059 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • de Sa, A. B., Gomes, J. P., Viegas, S., Ferreira, M. A., Paulino, A., Catry, M. d. A. (2002). Genital infection by Chlamydia trachomatis in Lisbon: prevalence and risk markers. Fam Pract 19: 362-364 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chernesky, M A (2002). Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostics. Sex. Transm. Infect. 78: 232-234 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bianchi, A., Moret, F., Desrues, J.-M., Champenois, T., Dervaux, Y., Desvouas, O., Oursin, A., Quinzat, D., Dachez, R., Bathelier, C., Ronsin, C. (2002). PreservCyt Transport Medium Used for the ThinPrep Pap Test Is a Suitable Medium for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the COBAS Amplicor CT/NG Test: Results of a Preliminary Study and Future Implications. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 1749-1754 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Land, J. A., Gijsen, A. P., Evers, J. L.H., Bruggeman, C. A. (2002). Chlamydia trachomatis in subfertile women undergoing uterine instrumentation: Screen or treat?. Hum Reprod 17: 525-527 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Loeffelholz, M. J., Jirsa, S. J., Teske, R. K., Woods, J. N. (2001). Effect of Endocervical Specimen Adequacy on Ligase Chain Reaction Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 3838-3841 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Alary, M., Poulin, C., Bouchard, C., Fortier, M., Murray, G., Gingras, S., Aube, M., Morin, C. (2001). Evaluation of a Modified Sanitary Napkin as a Sample Self-Collection Device for the Detection of Genital Chlamydial Infection in Women. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 2508-2512 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Van Dyck, E., Ieven, M., Pattyn, S., Van Damme, L., Laga, M. (2001). Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by Enzyme Immunoassay, Culture, and Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 1751-1756 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Johnson, S. J., Green, D. H., Reed, D. A., Wood, L. S. (2001). Semiautomation of Nucleic Acid-based Assays for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae,. Clin. Chem. 47: 760-763 [Full Text]  
  • Mukenge-Tshibaka, L., Alary, M., Bernier, F., van Dyck, E., Lowndes, C. M., Guédou, A., Anagonou, S., Joly, J. R. (2000). Diagnostic Performance of the Roche AMPLICOR PCR in Detecting Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Genitourinary Specimens from Female Sex Workers in Cotonou, Benin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 4076-4079 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • van Valkengoed, I. G M, Morre, S. A, van den Brule, A. J C, Meijer, C. J L M, Deville, W., Bouter, L. M, Boeke, A J. P (2000). Low diagnostic accuracy of selective screening criteria for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the general population. Sex. Transm. Infect. 76: 375-380 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Louie, M., Louie, L., Simor, A. E. (2000). The role of DNA amplification technology in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. CMAJ 163: 301-309 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gronowski, A. M., Copper, S., Baorto, D., Murray, P. R. (2000). Reproducibility Problems with the Abbott Laboratories LCx Assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 2416-2418 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Morré, S. A., Van Valkengoed, I. G. M., Moes, R. M., Boeke, A. J. P., Meijer, C. J. L. M., Van den Brule, A. J. C. (1999). Determination of Chlamydia trachomatis Prevalence in an Asymptomatic Screening Population: Performances of the LCx and COBAS Amplicor Tests with Urine Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3092-3096 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Waites, K. B., Smith, K. R., Crum, M. A., Hockett, R. D., Wells, A. H., Hook, E. W. III (1999). Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis Endocervical Infections by Ligase Chain Reaction versus ACCESS Chlamydia Antigen Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3072-3073 [Abstract] [Full Text]