Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 1999, p. 95-98, Vol. 37, No. 1
Haematology Laboratory,
Received 6 July 1998/Returned for modification 13 August
1998/Accepted 8 October 1998
A new, dried antigen-coated latex preparation for the demonstration
of infectious mononucleosis (IM) heterophile antibody (Dryspot IM kit;
Oxoid, Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom) was compared with
the IM kit (a liquid latex reagent from the same source), an
immunoassay (ImmunoCard Mono; Meridian Diagnostics), and an absorption
test (Monospot; Meridian Diagnostics). The latter was used as a
standard for initial statistical comparisons. Discrepancies were
resolved by using Epstein-Barr virus serology. Of the 328 routine
samples tested, 77 were positive and 222 were negative by all IM
heterophile antibody-based kits. Twenty-nine samples gave discrepant
results. Following resolution of discrepant results, the sensitivity
and specificity values for the IM Dryspot kit were 87.0 and 98.7%,
those for the Oxoid liquid latex IM kit were 83.0 and 99.6%, and those
for the ImmunoCard Mono immunoassay were 85.0 and 100.0%,
respectively. The evaluation shows that the Dryspot kit, which is
uniquely straightforward to use and may be stored at room temperature,
is comparable in performance to other rapid heterophile tests for the
confirmation of IM.
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of a Novel Dry Latex Preparation for
Demonstration of Infectious Mononucleosis Heterophile Antibody in
Comparison with Three Established Tests
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Haematology
Laboratory, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Craven Rd., Reading, Berkshire
RG1 5AN, United Kingdom. Phone: 0118 9877693. Fax: 0118 9877755.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 1999, p. 95-98, Vol. 37, No. 1
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»