This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 1999, p. 95-98, Vol. 37, No. 1
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of a Novel Dry Latex Preparation for Demonstration of Infectious Mononucleosis Heterophile Antibody in Comparison with Three Established Tests

Richard Rogers,1,* Alison Windust,2 and Josie Gregory3

Haematology Laboratory, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, Berkshire RG1 5AN,1 Haematology Laboratory, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Cosham, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3LY,2 and Oxoid, Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire RG24 8PW,3 United Kingdom

Received 6 July 1998/Returned for modification 13 August 1998/Accepted 8 October 1998

A new, dried antigen-coated latex preparation for the demonstration of infectious mononucleosis (IM) heterophile antibody (Dryspot IM kit; Oxoid, Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom) was compared with the IM kit (a liquid latex reagent from the same source), an immunoassay (ImmunoCard Mono; Meridian Diagnostics), and an absorption test (Monospot; Meridian Diagnostics). The latter was used as a standard for initial statistical comparisons. Discrepancies were resolved by using Epstein-Barr virus serology. Of the 328 routine samples tested, 77 were positive and 222 were negative by all IM heterophile antibody-based kits. Twenty-nine samples gave discrepant results. Following resolution of discrepant results, the sensitivity and specificity values for the IM Dryspot kit were 87.0 and 98.7%, those for the Oxoid liquid latex IM kit were 83.0 and 99.6%, and those for the ImmunoCard Mono immunoassay were 85.0 and 100.0%, respectively. The evaluation shows that the Dryspot kit, which is uniquely straightforward to use and may be stored at room temperature, is comparable in performance to other rapid heterophile tests for the confirmation of IM.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Haematology Laboratory, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Craven Rd., Reading, Berkshire RG1 5AN, United Kingdom. Phone: 0118 9877693. Fax: 0118 9877755.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 1999, p. 95-98, Vol. 37, No. 1
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wargo, K. A, McConnell, V., Jennings, M. (2005). Amoxicillin/telithromycin-induced rash in infectious mononucleosis. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 39: 1577-1577 [Full Text]