This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, M.
Right arrow Articles by Soothill, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, M.
Right arrow Articles by Soothill, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1999, p. 3780-3780, Vol. 37, No. 11
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Enhanced Growth of Surface-Attached Acanthamoeba polyphaga


    LETTER
Top
Letter
References

Acanthamoeba keratitis remains a problematic infection, especially for contact lens wearers. Current treatment is not always effective, and Acanthamoeba spp. may persist on contact lenses despite the use of disinfectant. Growth of Acanthamoeba polyphaga in culture medium without bacteria has already been studied (3), but we know of no previous studies of the effect of surface attachment on this organism's growth. Attachment can have a profound effect on the growth, survival, and disinfectant sensitivity of other microorganisms (1), so we have studied cultures of A. polyphaga on cellulose fibers compacted into small cylinders (20 mm in length and 10 mm in diameter) termed Sorbarods (Ilacon, Kent, United Kingdom). Sorbarods were originally developed for the growth of plant cells (2). Both light microscopy and wet scanning electron microscopy clearly demonstrated acanthamoebae adhering to the cellulose fibers.

To each of 15 Sorbarods 7.5 × 105 A. polyphaga trophozoites in 1 ml of peptone-yeast extract-glucose (PYG) medium were added, which completely wetted the Sorbarod. To prevent drying, the Sorbarod cultures were incubated suspended above 1 ml of sterile water in a sealed container. For each Sorbarod a control culture consisting of 1 ml of PYG medium in a bijou (5-ml glass screw-top bottle) was inoculated and incubated in the same way as the Sorbarod. Cultures were incubated aerobically for up to 45 days at 30°C, with pairs of cultures being removed and counted for A. polyphaga content about every 3 days. A. polyphaga counts in control cultures were determined by microscopy using a modified Fuchs-Rosenthal counting chamber. Sorbarods were first broken up and treated with Triton X-100 to release the amoebae, which were then pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended in 1 ml of Pages' saline, and the amoebic content was counted in the same way as the control cultures. This process probably underestimated the counts in the Sorbarod cultures.

Counts of trophozoites from the Sorbarods ranged from 8.8 × 105 to 4.5 × 106 per ml, with a median of 3.2 × 106, while counts of cysts ranged from 3.0 × 104 to 2.9 × 105, with a median of 1.6 × 105. Counts of trophozoites from control cultures ranged from 3.0 × 105 to 1.4 × 106, with a median of 5.1 × 105, and were in all cases lower than those from the paired Sorbarod cultures (P = 0.001 [Wilcoxon's signed rank test]). Counts of cysts from control cultures ranged from 1.1 × 104 to 1.0 × 105, with a median of 4.0 × 104. Counts of cysts in the Sorbarods were higher (P = 0.001) than those in the control cultures except in two pairs; in one pair both cultures had 0 cysts, and in the other pair both cultures had 1.0 × 105 cysts.

The presence of cellulose fibers enhances the growth and possibly the persistence of A. polyphaga in culture, probably due to the provision of a wide surface area for attachment to cells. Surface-attached cultures of Acanthamoebae may be of value for efficacy studies of treatment agents and of contact lens disinfectants.


    REFERENCES
Top
Letter
References

1. Brown, M. R. W., and P. Gilbert. 1993. Sensitivity of biofilms to antimicrobial agents. J. Appl. Bacteriology 74(Suppl.):87S-97S.
2. Conkie, D. 1988. A novel orchid micropropogation matrix. Orchid Rev. 6:390.
3. Neff, R. J., S. A. Ray, W. F. Benton, and M. Wilborn. 1964. Induction of synchronous encystment (differentiation) in Acanthamoebae sp., p. 55-83. In D. M. Prescott (ed.), Methods in cell Physiology. Academic Press, New York, N.Y
Malcolm Armstrong
James Soothill
Department of Medical Microbiology
2nd Floor Clinical Sciences Building
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Oxford Road
Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1999, p. 3780-3780, Vol. 37, No. 11
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, M.
Right arrow Articles by Soothill, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, M.
Right arrow Articles by Soothill, J.