Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1999, p. 4150-4152, Vol. 37, No. 12
Department of Medical
Microbiology1 and Department of
Gastroenterology,2 Academic Medical Center,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands3
Received 19 April 1999/Returned for modification 21 August
1999/Accepted 7 September 1999
The sera of 142 Helicobacter pylori-positive and 32 H. pylori-negative patients were assessed by a desktop test
(QuickVue), an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (HM-CAP), and
a solid-phase, two-step chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (Immulite).
These tests yielded sensitivities of 97, 97, and 91% and specificities of 97, 94, and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, the desktop test and
the ELISA are more sensitive than the chemiluminescent enzyme
immunoassay (P < 0.05). The chemiluminescent enzyme
immunoassay has the advantage that it is fully automated.
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of Three Commercial Serological Tests with Different
Methodologies To Assess Helicobacter pylori
Infection

*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Medical Microbiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Phone:
31-20-5664862. Fax: 31-20-6979271.
Present address: Kennemer Gasthuis, Department of Internal
Medicine, Gastroenterology, 2023 EA Haarlem, The Netherlands.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»