This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steward, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tenover, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steward, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tenover, F. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 1999, p. 544-547, Vol. 37, No. 3
0095-1137/99/$00.00+0

Comparison of Agar Dilution, Disk Diffusion, MicroScan, and Vitek Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods to Broth Microdilution for Detection of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Isolates of the Family Enterobacteriaceae

Christine D. Steward,1,* Sheila A. Stocker,1 Jana M. Swenson,1 Caroline M. O'Hara,1 Jonathan R. Edwards,1 Robert P. Gaynes,1 John E. McGowan Jr.,2 and Fred C. Tenover1

Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333,1 and Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 303222

Received 16 July 1998/Returned for modification 13 October 1998/Accepted 1 December 1998

Fluoroquinolone resistance appears to be increasing in many species of bacteria, particularly in those causing nosocomial infections. However, the accuracy of some antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for detecting fluoroquinolone resistance remains uncertain. Therefore, we compared the accuracy of the results of agar dilution, disk diffusion, MicroScan Walk Away Neg Combo 15 conventional panels, and Vitek GNS-F7 cards to the accuracy of the results of the broth microdilution reference method for detection of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin resistance in 195 clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae collected from six U.S. hospitals for a national surveillance project (Project ICARE [Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology]). For ciprofloxacin, very major error rates were 0% (disk diffusion and MicroScan), 0.9% (agar dilution), and 2.7% (Vitek), while major error rates ranged from 0% (agar dilution) to 3.7% (MicroScan and Vitek). Minor error rates ranged from 12.3% (agar dilution) to 20.5% (MicroScan). For ofloxacin, no very major errors were observed, and major errors were noted only with MicroScan (3.7% major error rate). Minor error rates ranged from 8.2% (agar dilution) to 18.5% (Vitek). Minor errors for all methods were substantially reduced when results with MICs within ±1 dilution of the broth microdilution reference MIC were excluded from analysis. However, the high number of minor errors by all test systems remains a concern.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Nosocomial Pathogens Laboratory Branch (G08), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone: (404) 639-2825. Fax: (404) 639-1381. E-mail: cks7{at}cdc.gov.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 1999, p. 544-547, Vol. 37, No. 3
0095-1137/99/$00.00+0



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Tenover, F. C., Williams, P. P., Stocker, S., Thompson, A., Clark, L. A., Limbago, B., Carey, R. B., Poppe, S. M., Shinabarger, D., McGowan, J. E. Jr. (2007). Accuracy of Six Antimicrobial Susceptibility Methods for Testing Linezolid against Staphylococci and Enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2917-2922 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Menozzi, M. G., Eigner, U., Covan, S., Rossi, S., Somenzi, P., Dettori, G., Chezzi, C., Fahr, A.-M. (2006). Two-Center Collaborative Evaluation of Performance of the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 4085-4094 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Carroll, K. C., Borek, A. P., Burger, C., Glanz, B., Bhally, H., Henciak, S., Flayhart, D. C. (2006). Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Staphylococci and Enterococci.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 2072-2077 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Comuzzi, B., Arcelloni, C., Vaiani, R., Paroni, R. (2001). Gentamicin diffusion in Mueller-Hinton agar plates from different manufacturers. J Antimicrob Chemother 47: 496-498 [Full Text]