This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mukkur, T. K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mukkur, T. K. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 1999, p. 606-610, Vol. 37, No. 3
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Nested Duplex PCR To Detect Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis and Its Application in Diagnosis of Pertussis in Nonmetropolitan Southeast Queensland, Australia

D. J. Farrell,1,2,* G. Daggard,2 and T. K. S. Mukkur2

Microbiology Department, Queensland Health Pathology Service, Toowoomba Laboratory,1 and Centres for Rural and Environmental Biotechnology and Health Practice and Research, Department of Biological and Physical Sciences, University of Southern Queensland,2 Queensland, Australia

Received 17 September 1998/Returned for modification 19 October 1998/Accepted 12 November 1998

A duplex PCR to detect Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis was developed with the insertion sequences IS481 (B. pertussis) and IS1001 (B. parapertussis) and evaluated with specimens from 520 consecutive patients presenting with possible pertussis. No culture-positive-PCR-negative results occurred, giving the method a sensitivity of 100%. For B. pertussis, 58 of 520 patients (11.2%) were positive by PCR compared to 17 of 520 patients positive (3.3%) by culture. For B. parapertussis, 7 of 520 patients (1.3%) were positive by PCR compared to 2 of 520 patients positive (0.4%) by culture. Two patients were positive for both B. pertussis and B. parapertussis. Patient records were reviewed to determine the validity of PCR-positive-culture-negative results. Forty-two of 49 patients who could be evaluated fulfilled the criteria for a case definition of pertussis, with 32 patients being <1 year of age and having classical pertussis symptoms. The seven patients who did not fulfil the criteria were aged 7 to 55 years and had a persistent cough for >2 weeks. The method was also used to investigate a classroom outbreak in which B. pertussis culture was positive for 5 of 28 patients. All five culture-positive specimens were confirmed by PCR, and an additional eight were positive by PCR. Of 25 patients from a suspected pertussis outbreak in a girls' dormitory, seven of seven specimens were negative for B. pertussis, although 13 of 25 patients were positive for B. pertussis immunoglobulin M (IgM) (2 of which produced equivocal IgA results, with 23 of 25 patients being negative). Five symptomatic patients were subsequently found to be positive (by IgM and particle agglutination assays) for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, demonstrating the value of PCR in rapidly excluding B. pertussis infection in an outbreak situation. Twenty-two of 71 (30.1%) throat swabs were positive by PCR compared to 2 of 71 (2.8%) throat swabs positive by culture, indicating that a reassessment of the use of throat swabs should be considered, particularly for older patients, in contact tracing, and in situations in which specimen collection is difficult.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: QHPS---Toowoomba Laboratory, Locked Bag No. 5, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia. Phone: 61 7 46316562. Fax: 61 7 46392279. E-mail: David_Farrell{at}health.qld.gov.au.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 1999, p. 606-610, Vol. 37, No. 3
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Register, K. B., Sanden, G. N. (2006). Prevalence and Sequence Variants of IS481 in Bordetella bronchiseptica: Implications for IS481-Based Detection of Bordetella pertussis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 4577-4583 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Antila, M., He, Q., de Jong, C., Aarts, I., Verbakel, H., Bruisten, S., Keller, S., Haanpera, M., Makinen, J., Eerola, E., Viljanen, M. K., Mertsola, J., van der Zee, A. (2006). Bordetella holmesii DNA is not detected in nasopharyngeal swabs from Finnish and Dutch patients with suspected pertussis.. J Med Microbiol 55: 1043-1051 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kamachi, K., Toyoizumi-Ajisaka, H., Toda, K., Soeung, S. C., Sarath, S., Nareth, Y., Horiuchi, Y., Kojima, K., Takahashi, M., Arakawa, Y. (2006). Development and Evaluation of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method for Rapid Diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis Infection.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 1899-1902 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Templeton, K. E., Scheltinga, S. A., van der Zee, A., Diederen, B. M. W., Kruijssen, A. M., Goossens, H., Kuijper, E., Claas, E. C. J. (2003). Evaluation of Real-Time PCR for Detection of and Discrimination between Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis, and Bordetella holmesii for Clinical Diagnosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4121-4126 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kosters, K., Reischl, U., Schmetz, J., Riffelmann, M., Wirsing von Konig, C. H. (2002). Real-Time LightCycler PCR for Detection and Discrimination of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 1719-1722 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sloan, L. M., Hopkins, M. K., Mitchell, P. S., Vetter, E. A., Rosenblatt, J. E., Harmsen, W. S., Cockerill, F. R., Patel, R. (2002). Multiplex LightCycler PCR Assay for Detection and Differentiation of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis in Nasopharyngeal Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 96-100 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Reischl, U., Lehn, N., Sanden, G. N., Loeffelholz, M. J. (2001). Real-Time PCR Assay Targeting IS481 of Bordetella pertussis and Molecular Basis for Detecting Bordetella holmesii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 1963-1966 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • KOSTERS, K., RIFFELMANN, M., VON KONIG, C. H. W. (2001). Evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for detection of Bordetella pertussis and B. parapertussis in clinical samples. J Med Microbiol 50: 436-440 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Farrell, D. J., McKeon, M., Daggard, G., Loeffelholz, M. J., Thompson, C. J., Mukkur, T. K. S. (2000). Rapid-Cycle PCR Method To Detect Bordetella pertussis That Fulfills All Consensus Recommendations for Use of PCR in Diagnosis of Pertussis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 4499-4502 [Abstract] [Full Text]