This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davoli, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Curley, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davoli, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Curley, D. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 1999, p. 2587-2591, Vol. 37, No. 8
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of the PrimeCapture CMV DNA Detection Plate System for Detection of Cytomegalovirus in Clinical Specimens

Eugene H. Davoli,1,2 Steven M. Lipson,1,2,3,* Mark E. Match,3 David H. Shepp,3 Joseph W. Morin,2 and Dennis M. Curley2

The Jane and Dayton Brown and Dayton T. Brown, Jr., Virology Laboratory, Departments of Laboratories1 and Medicine,3 North Shore University Hospital-New York University School of Medicine, Manhasset, and Department of Biology, Richard L. Conolly College, Long Island University, Brooklyn,2 New York

Received 24 February 1999/Returned for modification 22 April 1999/Accepted 6 May 1999

With the availability of anticytomegalovirus (CMV) therapeutic agents, rapid detection of CMV is important in the care and management of the immunosuppressed patient. The PrimeCapture CMV DNA Detection Plate System (PC-PCR) was evaluated for the detection of CMV in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The resolution of discordant results was performed by consensus testing utilizing a combination of conventional cell culture (TC-CPE), the CMV-antigenemia (CMV-Ag) assay, one or more in-house CMV nested PCR assays, and/or patient evaluation and follow-up. Of 51 blood specimens from 34 patients, 23 (45%) were identified as true positives. PC-PCR was significantly more sensitive than the CMV-Ag assay, TC-CPE, or a combination of both tests. The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) for PC-PCR, the CMV-Ag assay, TC-CPE, and a combination of CMV-Ag and TC-CPE were 78, 75, 72, 81%; 46, 100, 100, 70%; 39, 100, 100, 67%; and 58, 100, 100, 73%, respectively. CMV was not detected or isolated in CSF, resulting in a combined PC-PCR sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 77, 90, 68, and 93%, respectively. Among those laboratorians considering the incorporation of molecular CMV diagnostics into their clinical microbiology or virology laboratories, the CMV PC-PCR offers a relatively simple-to-perform and sensitive assay system.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Infectious Diseases, North Shore University Hospital-NYU School of Medicine, 300 Community Dr., Manhasset, NY 11030. Phone: (516) 562-4464. Fax: (516) 562-2626. E-mail: montmor{at}aol.com.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 1999, p. 2587-2591, Vol. 37, No. 8
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lipson, S. M., Della-Latta, P. (2000). Leukocyte Concentration in the Performance of the pp65 Antigenemia Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 3137-3138 [Full Text]