Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 1999, p. 2745-2749, Vol. 37, No. 9
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
MINIREVIEW
Recent Advances in Determining the Pathogenesis of
Canine Monocytic Ehrlichiosis
Shimon
Harrus,1,*
Trevor
Waner,2
Hylton
Bark,1
Frans
Jongejan,3 and
Albert
W. C. A.
Cornelissen3
Department of Clinical Sciences, School of
Veterinary Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem,
Rehovot,1 and Israel Institute for
Biological Research, Ness Ziona,2 and
Department of Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary
Medicine, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The
Netherlands3
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (CME)
is a potentially fatal tick-borne disease caused by the rickettsia
Ehrlichia canis (16). The etiologic agent was
first recognized in Algeria in 1935 (8). Since then, it has
been reported worldwide, causing extensive morbidity and mortality
among domestic dogs and other canids (11, 28, 51). The
principal vector of CME is Rhipicephalus sanguineus (11). Recently, it has been shown experimentally that
Dermacentor variabilis is also capable of transmitting
E. canis (24).
The pathogenesis of CME consists of an incubation period of 8 to 20 days, followed sequentially by acute, subclinical, and in some cases
chronic phases. The disease may be manifested by a wide variety of
clinical signs of which depression, lethargy, weight loss, anorexia,
pyrexia, lymphadenomegaly, splenomegaly, and bleeding tendencies are
the most common. Principal hematologic abnormalities include
thrombocytopenia, mild anemia and mild leukopenia during the acute
stage, mild thrombocytopenia in the subclinical stage, and pancytopenia
in the severe chronic stage. The main biochemical abnormalities include
hypoalbuminemia, hyperglobulinemia, and hypergammaglobulinemia
(16).
CME has been researched extensively in the last decade, and special
efforts have been made to elucidate the pathogenesis of the disease.
Better understanding of major mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis
of the disease may assist clinicians in understanding the disease
process and providing appropriate treatment, affording a better
prognosis to their patients. In the light of the recent emergence of
similar ehrlichial pathogens that infect human patients, the
understanding of pathogenic processes in CME may contribute to the
understanding of human monocytic ehrlichiosis and human granulocytic
ehrlichiosis. This article reviews recent investigations in the
pathogenesis of CME with special reference to platelet disorders and
serum protein alterations, the principal hematological and biochemical
abnormalities in CME, respectively. Host immune response in both acute
and persistent E. canis infection is discussed and is
proposed to be involved in the pathogenesis of disease manifestations.
 |
PLATELET DISORDERS |
Thrombocytopenia is considered to be the most common and
consistent hematological abnormality of dogs naturally or
experimentally infected with E. canis (56). The
thrombocytopenia in CME is attributed to different mechanisms in the
different stages of the disease. Mechanisms thought to be involved in
the pathogenesis of thrombocytopenia in the acute phase of the disease
include increased platelet consumption due to inflammatory changes in blood vessel endothelium, increased splenic sequestration of platelets, and immunologic destruction or injury resulting in a significantly decreased platelet life span (27, 43, 54). Studies using radioisotopes have shown that platelet survival time decreased from a
mean of 9 days to 4 days, 2 to 4 days after infection with E. canis (54). In addition, a platelet migration
inhibition factor was isolated and characterized. This factor is
proposed to play a role in enhancing platelet sequestration and stasis, leading to reduced peripheral-blood platelet counts (1).
Demonstration of serum platelet-bindable antiplatelet antibodies (APA)
in dogs after experimental infection with E. canis supports
the assumption that immune destruction may also contribute to the
pathogenesis of thrombocytopenia in acute ehrlichiosis (14,
56). The earliest detection of APA was made on day 7 postinfection (p.i.) in one of six dogs, on day 13 in three, and on day
17 in the two remaining dogs (14). APA have also been demonstrated in 80% of serum samples of human patients infected with
granulocytic ehrlichiosis (60). The stimulus for the
production of these autoantibodies is not fully understood; however,
two theories have been proposed. The early appearance of APA prior to
appearance of E. canis antibodies suggested that B cells
carrying natural autoantibody receptors may be induced to undergo
proliferation and maturation by interaction with ehrlichial antigens
which are antigenically similar to self antigens. The alternative
theory proposed that APA develop secondarily to platelet components
undergoing destruction and massive release of platelet structural
proteins brought about by nonimmunologic platelet destruction
(56). Complement consumption was shown to occur during the
thrombocytopenic phase of acute ehrlichiosis, and partial
decomplementation of infected dogs' sera moderated the severity of the
thrombocytopenia, further substantiating the argument for an
immunopathologic component in the pathogenesis of thrombocytopenia in
CME (33). Concurrently with the development of the
thrombocytopenia during the acute phase, a significant increase in the
mean platelet volume is usually seen and reflects active thrombopoiesis
(56). In the severe chronic phase of disease, decreased
platelet production due to bone marrow hypoplasia is considered to be
the reason for the thrombocytopenia (61). In this stage,
dogs frequently exhibit pancytopenia as a result of this hypoplastic
bone marrow, further complicating their clinical status.
Platelet adhesiveness was shown to decrease in dogs acutely infected
with E. canis (33). Furthermore, sera of E. canis-infected dogs were shown to inhibit platelet aggregation
when incubated with platelets of a healthy dog, seronegative for CME.
These findings suggest that platelet dysfunction may occur in the acute
stage of CME and, together with thrombocytopenia, may be a factor
contributing to the bleeding tendency observed in the disease
(13). The presence of maximal concentrations of serum APA
concurrent with platelet dysfunction (in days 17 to 24 after
experimental infection) suggested that APA played a role in causing
platelet dysfunction in the acute stage of canine ehrlichiosis.
Interaction of APA with platelet membrane glycoproteins was proposed to
cause the platelet dysfunction (13).
 |
SERUM PROTEIN ALTERATIONS |
Hypoalbuminemia, hyperglobulinemia, and hypergammaglobulinemia are
the predominant biochemical abnormalities found in dogs infected with
E. canis (5, 12, 58). The hypoalbuminemia seen in
CME may be the consequence of peripheral loss of albumin to edematous
inflammatory fluids as a result of increased vascular permeability
(61), blood loss, or decreased protein production due to
concurrent mild liver disease (45), or it may be due to
minimal-change glomerulopathy (6). As albumin synthesis is
regulated by oncotic pressure (53), the decrease in albumin concentrations may act as a compensatory mechanism for the
hyperglobulinemic state, thereby maintaining the oncotic pressure and
preventing an increase in blood viscosity (61).
The hypergammaglobulinemia in CME is usually polyclonal. Monoclonal
gammopathy rarely occurs and may result in hyperviscosity and
associated clinical manifestations (12, 22, 42). Gamma globulin concentrations increase during the febrile phase of canine ehrlichiosis and persist during the subclinical and chronic phases of
the disease (51). There is a poor correlation between the gamma globulin concentrations and specific E. canis antibody
titers (12, 45, 58). The poor correlation between these two
parameters and the polyclonal gammopathy recorded to occur in most sick
dogs suggest that nonspecific antibody production is induced by
E. canis and that the anti-E. canis antibodies
are not the main source of gamma globulins contributing to the
hypergammaglobulinemia. This phenomenon is known to occur in other
diseases with prolonged antigenic stimulation (55) and
suggests an exaggerated immune response to E. canis with
inadequate effectiveness (45).
2- and
2-globulin concentrations were
also found to increase in infected dogs (12). In order to
elucidate whether acute-phase protein responses occur in dogs infected
with E. canis, C-reactive protein, a
-globulin, has been
studied (50). Levels of C-reactive protein were found to
rise gradually between days 4 and 6 p.i. and declined to
preinfection levels by day 34, substantiating the hypothesis that the
acute-phase protein response occurs in the acute phase of CME. The
increase in
2-globulin concentrations may be the
consequence of tissue damage and inflammation, as it has previously
been demonstrated that synthesis of
2-globulin by the
liver was stimulated by leukocyte endogenous mediators in response to
tissue damage and inflammation (29).
 |
IMMUNE RESPONSE |
Increasing evidence supports the assumption that immune mechanisms
are involved in the pathogenesis of acute CME. This evidence includes
extensive plasma cell infiltration of parenchymal organs, the
occurrence of polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia that does not correlate
with specific E. canis antibody titers, positive Coomb's
and autoagglutination tests, and the induction of APA production
following experimental E. canis infection in dogs (12, 21, 61).
There is no predilection for age or sex, and all breeds may be infected
with CME (15); however, German shepherd dogs (GSD) seem to
be more susceptible to CME than other breeds (15, 38, 51).
Moreover, the disease in GSD is more severe and has a poorer prognosis
than in other breeds (15). Differences in breed
susceptibility can be attributed to breed differences in the ability to
mount adequate cellular and/or humoral immune responses. It has been documented that the cellular immune response against E. canis is depressed in GSD compared with beagle dogs
(38). In the same study, no significant differences in the
humoral response were noted between the two breeds. These findings
suggest that the cellular immune response is the more important
component of the immune system providing protection against E. canis. In experimentally infected dogs, persistent high antibody
titers following treatment and elimination of the rickettsia were shown
to be of no protective value when dogs were challenged with homologous
or heterologous E. canis strains (4, 51). Thus,
the humoral immune response does not appear to play an important role
in protection against E. canis; conversely, it has been
proposed to contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease (21,
51).
A state of premunition (protective immunity) is thought to occur in
dogs subclinically infected with E. canis and also in infected dogs after short-term treatment with oxytetracycline (3,
9, 30, 51). It seems that protective immunity in CME is
maintained primarily via the cellular immune response rather than the
humoral response.
The humoral response to E. canis may be studied by serum
protein electrophoresis and serological testing using the
immunofluorescence antibody test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,
and Western immunoblot. Immunoblot analysis showed that immune sera
obtained from E. canis-infected dogs react with a wide
variety of E. canis proteins in the range of 21 to 160 kDa
(20, 23, 39, 48, 50). The strongest immune reaction has been
shown to a protein of approximately 27 to 30 kDa (4, 20, 36,
49). Results of a comparative international survey indicated that
antigenic heterogeneity may exist among E. canis organisms
in different regions of the world (20, 47). A similar
heterogeneity was reported in the antibody response to Cowdria
ruminantium (of the Ehrlichieae tribe). An
immunodominant conserved antigen of approximately 32 kDa (Cr32) has
been found in C. ruminantium (26), and this antigen was later renamed MAP1 (2), after it became clear
that its molecular size varied not only according to the geographical origin of the strain but also according to the electrophoretic conditions. This antigenic diversity may be one of the reasons for the
variety in the clinical manifestations of CME in different geographical
regions. This hypothesis is substantiated by the fact that heterologous
challenge of dogs with the North Carolina isolate of E. canis 90 days following challenge with the Florida strain (after
treatment and elimination of the rickettsia) resulted in increased
disease severity in comparison with that induced by homologous
challenge (4).
Host response to E. canis infection was suspected to play an
important role in the pathogenesis of the disease, and alteration of
the host's immune system by using cyclophosphamide and antilymphocyte serum has proven to alter the pathologic and clinical manifestations of
experimental E. canis infection (46). To
determine the role of the spleen in the pathogenesis of CME, the effect
of splenectomy on the course of the acute phase of experimental CME was
investigated (19). The clinical and hematological findings
of the study indicated that the disease process was considerably milder
in the splenectomized dogs than in the intact dogs. There did not
appear to be any difference in the time of appearance or in the titer
of anti-E. canis immunoglobulin G antibodies between
splenectomized and intact dogs throughout the course of the study.
During the acute stage, food consumption was significantly higher in
the splenectomized group than in the intact group. During this period,
significantly higher body temperatures were measured in the intact
group compared to the splenectomized group. The hematocrit, erythrocyte
counts, hemoglobin concentrations, and platelet counts were
significantly higher in the splenectomized group than in the intact
group during the whole course of the study. The spleen plays a major
role in the pathogenesis of immune-mediated diseases, and in cases
refractory to medical treatment splenectomy may be indicated
(31). Removal of the dominant organ producing antibodies and
elimination of one of the major sites of the monocytic phagocytic
system are considered the main objectives achieved by splenectomy. The
spleen is a major site for the synthesis of tuftsin and properdin,
which serve as opsonins and promote phagocytosis. The spleen is also an
important site for the synthesis of complement components. By
elimination of the splenic macrophages and reduction of complement
components and opsonins, postsplenectomy phagocytosis is compromised
(10, 32). The results of our recent study suggest that the
spleen plays a key role in the pathogenesis of CME and further support
the notion that immune mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of
CME (19).
 |
PERSISTENCE OF INFECTION |
Following the acute phase of the disease, E. canis
infection may persist after spontaneous clinical recovery or
ineffective treatment, and such animals may enter the subclinical stage
of CME (17). Mild hematological abnormalities have been
reported to occur in the subclinical phase of disease in experimentally and naturally infected dogs. These abnormalities include mild thrombocytopenia and a significant decrease in leukocyte counts compared to preinfection values, due to a reduction in the neutrophil counts. However, the dogs were neither leukopenic nor neutropenic during this stage (7, 57). These findings suggest that the mild thrombocytopenia and reduced leukocyte counts may be indicative of
continued pathological changes and therefore should not be overlooked,
as these animals may be subclinical carriers of E. canis.
In a 3-year follow-up study, ehrlichial DNA was amplified by PCR from
four of six clinically healthy untreated dogs 34 months after
experimental infection with E. canis. At this stage, the two
PCR-negative dogs had platelet counts within the reference range, while
three of the four PCR-positive dogs were thrombocytopenic. Furthermore,
one of the PCR-negative dogs was seronegative and the other had the
lowest E. canis antibody titers. These findings proved that
clinically healthy dogs in the subclinical phase of CME are carriers of
the rickettsia, that infection with E. canis may persist for
years without development of the chronic clinical disease, and that
some dogs can eliminate the parasite and recover from CME without
medical treatment (as occurred in two of the six dogs) (17,
18). Asymptomatic persistent infection (for 1 year) of a woman
with a rickettsia named Venezuelan human ehrlichia (VHE) was also
reported. The VHE was found to be closely related to the Oklahoma and
Florida strains of E. canis, with 99.9% similarity in the
base sequence of the 16S rRNA genes. The VHE was proposed to be a new
strain or a subspecies of E. canis (41).
As premunition requires a carrier state, the finding of our subclinical
study substantiates the possibility of existence of premunition in
subclinical CME (17). We extracted DNA from blood, bone
marrow, and splenic aspirates from each of six dogs. Ehrlichial DNA was
retrieved from the spleens of all four PCR-positive dogs but from bone
marrow and blood samples of only two. These findings indicate the
importance of the spleen in the pathogenesis and establishment of the
disease. They also correlate with the fact that splenectomized dogs
experimentally infected with E. canis suffered more mildly
from the acute disease, probably due to removal of a major organ in
which colonization by the parasite takes place (19). These
findings also suggest that of the spleen, bone marrow, and blood, the
spleen is probably the last to harbor E. canis parasites
during recovery. It was suggested that splenic aspirates are the best
source of DNA for PCR used in diagnosing an E. canis carrier
state during subclinical ehrlichiosis. It was also suggested that PCR
performed with DNA extracted from blood or bone marrow samples would
not give correct results and may even be misleading. In addition to
PCR, Western immunoblot analysis may assist in determination of the
stage of infection. It has been shown that during the acute phase (days
7 to 30 p.i.), untreated dogs produce antibodies against
low-molecular-mass major proteins (
30 kDa). However, antibodies to
higher-molecular-mass proteins (>30 kDa) are more easily detected in
persistent infections (39, 48). Tissue culture and/or PCR
may give the most accurate results in determining the persistence of
ehrlichial infection (4, 18, 23). In our experience, the
indirect immunofluorescence antibody test is not a reliable method to
determine persistence of infection or success of treatment during or
shortly after treatment, as titers have been shown to remain high for
long periods after elimination of the parasite (18).
Microscopic evaluation of Giemsa-stained smears prepared from blood,
bone marrow, and splenic aspirates was shown to be an insensitive
technique for the diagnosis of subclinical CME. It is probable that the
number of parasites in a subclinically infected animal is too small to
be observed on microscopic examination of blood, bone marrow, or
splenic smears (18).
Some dogs suffering from the subclinical stage of CME can develop the
severe life-threatening chronic stage of the disease. The conditions
that lead to the development of the chronic stage are not fully
understood; however, they may be related to the breed, the immune
status of the animal, stress conditions, coinfections with other
parasites, geographical location, the strain of the parasite, or
persistent reinfection (4, 16, 20). The risk of developing
the chronic, severe form of the disease should be considered in
subclinical cases and should not be ignored. Diagnosing and treating
these subclinical dogs is recommended in order to prevent further
progression of the disease (18).
 |
FUTURE DIRECTIONS |
The pathogenesis of the acute phase of CME has been investigated
extensively, and recent research has added to our knowledge of the
subclinical phase. However, little is known regarding the pathogenesis
of the chronic phase of CME. This phase of the disease has not yet
undergone comprehensive investigation as no suitable model for the
chronic disease has been developed to date, nor has it been possible to
consistently induce the chronic disease in experimentally infected
dogs. Therefore, it is proposed that clinical trials using dogs with
the naturally occurring chronic disease should be undertaken. Better
understanding of the conditions that lead to the development of this
stage and understanding of the pathogenesis of the bone marrow
depression in this stage may aid in development of better treatment
protocols and result in an improved prognosis.
Investigation of the cellular immune response to E. canis,
the cytokines involved, and their role in the pathogenesis of CME warrants further investigation into the different phases of the disease. Understanding the immune mechanisms and determining the factors involved in the pathogenesis of each phase are essential. These
findings may also resolve the debate on the use of immunosuppressive drugs in the different phases of CME and may also promote research on
vaccine production.
No successful vaccine for CME or for any human or canine ehrlichial
disease has yet been developed. In a series of immunization studies
using inactivated cell culture-derived E. canis antigen, fortified by adjuvants, good levels of antibody response were induced.
However, when dogs were challenged, the clinical manifestation of the
disease in the immunized animals appeared more fulminating than in the
nonimmunized control dogs (51). Conversely, in a recent
study, five German shepherd dogs were immunized with inactivated E. canis in combination with the adjuvant Quil A, while two
control dogs were injected only with the adjuvant. In vitro
proliferation assays using peripheral blood mononuclear cells, high
indirect immunofluorescent-antibody titers, and Western blotting
demonstrated induction of the cellular and humoral immune responses
following immunization. Challenge infection with live E. canis resulted in milder clinical and hematological signs in the
immunized dogs than in the control dogs. The authors suggested that
partial protection was achieved by the immunization with the
inactivated E. canis organisms (34). Attenuated
and inactivated vaccines derived from the closely related ehrlichia
C. ruminantium have been shown to produce protection in
small ruminants (25, 35). Furthermore, a MAP1-based DNA
vaccine prepared from C. ruminantium was shown to be
efficient in protecting up to 88% of mice on challenge with a lethal
dose of the homologous strain (37). Recently, the 28- and
30-kDa surface-antigen genes of E. canis were cloned and
sequenced (40, 47). This might eventually result in the
development of a recombinant vaccine against CME. However, this may not
be easy, as antigenic variation between strains from different
geographical regions may exist (20). The significance of
such a finding with regard to vaccine production has to be further
investigated as it may complicate the development of recombinant
vaccines based on the major outer membrane proteins (20,
47). Development of an E. canis vaccine, which may be
used in the prophylactic program to prevent E. canis
infection in dogs and other wild canids, will have significant
socioeconomic implications as well as animal welfare benefits.
Successful development of a vaccine will serve as a model for the
development of other antiehrlichial vaccines, especially against the
life-threatening human ehrlichial diseases.
To date, tick control remains the most effective preventive measure
against E. canis infection. The most acceptable method is
the conventional use of acaracides. An alternative novel method for
tick control used with large animals is the antitick vaccine. The
protective antigen Bm86 was identified from the guts of semiengorged adult female Boophilus microplus ticks and was obtained by
recombinant-DNA technology (44, 59). Vaccines containing
this antigen were released to the market and were shown to be effective
in field trials (52). The concept of antitick vaccination of
pet animals has not been investigated. With respect to CME, development
of a vaccine against R. sanguineus warrants future investigation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of
Veterinary Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot, Israel 76100. Phone: 972-3-9688546. Fax: 972-3-9604079. E-mail: harrus{at}agri.huji.ac.il.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abeygunawardena, I. S.,
I. Kakoma, and R. D. Smith.
1990.
Pathophysiology of canine ehrlichiosis, p. 78-92.
In
J. C. Williams, and I. Kakoma (ed.), Ehrlichiosis: a vector-borne disease of animals and humans. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
|
| 2.
|
Barbet, A. F.,
S. M. Semu,
N. Chigagure,
P. J. Kelly,
F. Jongejan, and S. M. Mahan.
1994.
Size variation of the immunodominant protein of Cowdria ruminantium.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
1:744-746[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bool, P. H.
1959.
Studies on Ehrlichia canis (syn. Rickettsia canis).
Acta Trop.
16:97-107[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Breitschwerdt, E. B.,
B. C. Hegarty, and S. I. Hancock.
1998.
Doxycycline hyclate treatment of experimental canine ehrlichiosis followed by challenge inoculation with two Ehrlichia canis strains.
J. Vet. Int. Med.
42:362-368.
|
| 5.
|
Burghen, G. A.,
W. R. Beisel,
J. S. Walker,
R. M. Nims,
D. L. Huxsoll, and P. K. Hildbrandt.
1971.
Development of hypergammaglobulinemia in tropical canine pancytopenia.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
32:749-756[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Codner, E. C.,
T. Caceci,
G. K. Saunders,
C. A. Smith,
J. L. Robertson,
R. A. Martin, and G. C. Troy.
1992.
Investigation of glomerular lesions in dogs with acute experimentally induced Ehrlichia canis infection.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
53:2286-2291[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Codner, E. C., and L. Farris-Smith.
1986.
Characterization of the subclinical phase of ehrlichiosis in dogs.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
189:47-50[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Donatien, A., and A. Lestoquard.
1935.
Existance en Algerie d'une rickettsia du chien.
Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot.
28:418-419.
|
| 9.
|
Donatien, A., and A. Lestoquard.
1936.
Existance de la premunition dans la rickettsiose naturelle ou experimentale du chien.
Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot.
29:378-383.
|
| 10.
|
Eichner, E. R.
1979.
Splenic function: normal, too much and too little.
Am. J. Med.
66:311-320[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Groves, M. G.,
G. L. Dennis,
H. L. Amyx, and D. L. Huxsoll.
1975.
Transmission of Ehrlichia canis to dogs by ticks (Rhipicephalus sanguineus).
Am. J. Vet. Res.
36:937-940[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Harrus, S.,
T. Waner,
Y. Avidar,
E. Bogin,
P. Huo-Cheng, and H. Bark.
1996.
Serum protein alterations in canine ehrlichiosis.
Vet. Parasitol.
66:241-249[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Harrus, S.,
T. Waner,
A. Eldor,
E. Zwang, and H. Bark.
1996.
Platelet dysfunction associated with experimental acute canine ehrlichiosis.
Vet. Rec.
139:290-293[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Harrus, S.,
T. Waner,
D. J. Weiss,
A. Keysary, and H. Bark.
1996.
Kinetics of serum antiplatelet antibodies in experimental acute canine ehrlichiosis.
Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.
51:13-20[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Harrus, S.,
P. H. Kass,
E. Klement, and T. Waner.
1997.
Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis: a retrospective study of 100 cases, and an epidemiological investigation of prognostic indicators for the disease.
Vet. Rec.
141:360-363[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Harrus, S.,
T. Waner, and H. Bark.
1997.
Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis an update.
Comp. Cont. Ed. Prac. Vet.
19:431-444.
|
| 17.
|
Harrus, S.,
T. Waner,
I. Aizenberg,
J. E. Foley,
A. M. Poland, and H. Bark.
1998.
Amplification of ehrlichial DNA from dogs 34 months after infection with Ehrlichia canis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:73-76[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Harrus, S.,
T. Waner,
I. Aizenberg, and H. Bark.
1998.
Therapeutic effect of doxycycline in experimental subclinical canine monocytic ehrlichiosis: evaluation of a 6-week course.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:2140-2142[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Harrus, S.,
T. Waner,
A. Keysary,
I. Aroch,
H. Voet, and H. Bark.
1998.
Investigation of splenic functions in canine monocytic ehrlichiosis.
Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.
62:15-27[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Hegarty, B. C.,
M. G. Levy,
R. F. Gager, and E. B. Breitschwerdt.
1997.
Immunoblot analysis of the immunoglobulin G response to Ehrlichia canis in dogs: an international survey.
J. Vet. Diagn. Invest.
9:32-38[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Hildebrandt, P. K.,
D. L. Huxsoll,
J. S. Walker,
R. M. Nims,
R. Taylor, and M. Andrews.
1973.
Pathology of canine ehrlichiosis (tropical canine pancytopenia).
Am. J. Vet. Res.
34:1309-1320[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Hoskins, J. D.,
O. Barta, and J. Rothschmitt.
1983.
Serum hyperviscosity syndrome associated with Ehrlichia canis infection in a dog.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
183:1011-1012[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Iqbal, Z.,
W. Chaichanasiriwithaya, and Y. Rikihisa.
1994.
Comparison of PCR with other tests for early diagnosis of canine ehrlichiosis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:1658-1662[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Johnson, E. M.,
S. A. Ewing,
R. W. Barker,
J. C. Fox,
D. W. Crow, and K. Kocan.
1998.
Experimental transmission of Ehrlichia canis (Rickettsiales: Ehrlichieae) by Dermacentor variabilis (Acari: Ixodidae).
Vet. Parasitol.
74:277-288[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Jongejan, F.
1991.
Protective immunity to heartwater (Cowdria ruminantium infection) is acquired after vaccination with in vitro-attenuated rickettsia.
Infect. Immun.
59:729-731[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Jongejan, F., and M. J. C. Thielemans.
1989.
Identification of an immunodominant antigenically conserved 32-kilodalton protein from Cowdria ruminantium.
Infect. Immun.
57:3243-3246[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Kakoma, I.,
C. A. Carson,
M. Ristic,
E. M. Stephenson,
P. K. Hildebrandt, and D. L. Huxsoll.
1978.
Platelet migration inhibition as an indicator of immunologically mediated target cell injury in canine ehrlichiosis.
Infect. Immun.
20:242-247[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Keef, T. J.,
C. J. Holland,
P. E. Salyer, and M. Ristic.
1982.
Distribution of Ehrlichia canis among military working dogs in the world and selected civilian dogs in the United States.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
181:236-238[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Koj, A.
1984.
Pathophysiology of plasma protein metabolism, p. 221-248.
Macmillan, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 30.
|
Leeflang, P.
1971.
Relation between carrier state oxytetracycline administration and immunity in Ehrlichia canis infection.
Vet. Rec.
90:703-704.
|
| 31.
|
Lewis, D. C., and K. M. Meyers.
1996.
Canine idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura.
J. Vet. Int. Med.
10:207-218.
|
| 32.
|
Lockwood, C. M.
1983.
Immunological functions of the spleen.
Clin. Haematol.
12:449-465[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Lovering, S. L.,
K. R. Pierce, and L. G. Adams.
1980.
Serum complement and blood platelet adhesiveness in acute canine ehrlichiosis.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
41:1266-1271[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Mahan, S.
1998.
Immunization of German shepherd dogs against canine ehrlichiosis using inactivated Ehrlichia canis organisms. MSc. thesis.
University of Zimbabwe, Harare.
|
| 35.
|
Martinez, D.,
J. C. Maillard,
S. Cosine,
C. Sheikboudou, and A. Bensaid.
1994.
Protection of goats against heartwater acquired by immunisation with inactivated elementary bodies of Cowdria ruminantium.
Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.
41:153-163[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Matthewman, L. A.,
P. J. Kelly,
S. M. Mahan,
D. Semu,
M. Tagwira,
P. A. Bobade,
P. Brouqui,
P. R. Mason, and D. Raoult.
1993.
Western blot and indirect fluorescent antibody testing for antibodies reactive with Ehrlichia canis in sera from apparently healthy dogs in Zimbabwe.
J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc.
64:111-115[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Nyika, A.,
S. M. Mahan,
M. J. Burridge,
T. C. Mcguire,
F. Rurangirwa, and A. F. Barbet.
1998.
A DNA vaccine protects mice against the rickettsial agent Cowdria ruminantium.
Parasite Immunol.
20:111-119[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Nyindo, M.,
D. L. Huxsoll,
M. Ristic,
I. Kakoma,
J. L. Brown,
C. A. Carson, and E. H. Stephenson.
1980.
Cell-mediated and humoral immune responses of German shepherd dogs and beagles to experimental infection with Ehrlichia canis.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
41:250-254[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Nyindo, M.,
I. Kakoma, and R. Hansen.
1991.
Antigenic analysis of four species of the genus Ehrlichia by use of protein immunoblot.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
52:1225-1230[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Ohashi, N.,
A. Unver,
N. Zhi, and Y. Rikihisa.
1998.
Cloning and characterization of multigenes encoding the immunodominant 30-kilodalton major outer membrane proteins of Ehrlichia canis and application of the recombinant protein for serodiagnosis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:2671-2680[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Perez, M.,
Y. Rikihisa, and B. Wen.
1996.
Ehrlichia canis-like agent isolated from a man in Venezuela: antigenic and genetic characterization.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:2133-2139[Abstract].
|
| 42.
|
Perille, A. L., and R. E. Matus.
1991.
Canine ehrlichiosis in six dogs with persistently increased antibody titers.
J. Vet. Int. Med.
5:195-198.
|
| 43.
|
Pierce, K. R.,
G. E. Marrs, and D. Hightower.
1977.
Acute canine ehrlichiosis: platelet survival and factor 3 assay.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
38:1821-1825[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Rand, K.,
T. Moore,
A. Srikatha,
K. Spring,
R. Tellam,
P. Willadsen, and G. S. Cobon.
1989.
Cloning and expression of a protective antigen from cattle tick Boophilus microplus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:9657-9661[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Reardon, M. J., and K. R. Pierce.
1981.
Acute experimental canine ehrlichiosis. I. Sequential reaction of the hemic and lymphoreticular systems.
Vet. Pathol.
18:48-61[Abstract].
|
| 46.
|
Reardon, M. J., and K. R. Pierce.
1981.
Acute experimental canine ehrlichiosis. II. Sequential reaction of the hemic and lymphoreticular systems of selectively immunosuppressed dogs.
Vet. Pathol.
18:384-395[Abstract].
|
| 47.
|
Reddy, G. R.,
C. R. Sulsona,
A. F. Barbet,
S. M. Mahan,
M. J. Burridge, and A. R. Alleman.
1998.
Molecular characterization of a 28 kDa surface antigen gene family of the tribe Ehrlichiae.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
247:636-643[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Rikihisa, Y.,
S. A. Ewing,
J. C. Fox,
A. G. Siregar,
F. H. Pasariba, and M. B. Malole.
1992.
Analysis of Ehrlichia canis and canine granulocytic Ehrlichia infection.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:143-148[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Rikihisa, Y.,
S. A. Ewing, and J. C. Fox.
1994.
Western immunoblot analysis of Ehrlichia chaffeensis, E. canis, or E. ewingii infections in dogs and humans.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2107-2112[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Rikihisa, Y.,
S. Yamamoto,
I. Kwak,
Z. Iqbal,
G. Kociba,
J. Mott, and W. Chichanasiriwithaya.
1994.
C-reactive protein and 1-acid glycoprotein levels in dogs infected with Ehrlichia canis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:912-917[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Ristic, M., and C. J. Holland.
1993.
Canine ehrlichiosis, p. 169-186.
In
Z. Woldehiwet, and M. Ristic (ed.), Rickettsial and chlamydial diseases of domestic animals. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
|
| 52.
|
Rodriguez, M.,
C. Massard,
A. Henrique da Fonseca,
R. N. Fonseca,
H. Machado,
V. Labarta, and J. de la Fuente.
1995.
Effect of vaccination with a recombinant Bm86 antigen preparation on natural infestation of Boophilus microplus in grazing dairy and beef pure and cross-bred cattle in Brazil.
Vaccine
13:1804-1808[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Rothschild, M. A.,
M. Oratz, and S. S. Schreiber.
1984.
Pathophysiology of plasma protein metabolism, p. 121-140.
Macmillan, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 54.
|
Smith, R. D.,
M. Ristic,
D. L. Huxsoll, and R. A. Baylor.
1975.
Platelet kinetics in canine ehrlichiosis: evidence for increased platelet destruction as the cause of thrombocytopenia.
Infect. Immun.
11:1216-1221[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Tizard, I.
1982.
An introduction to veterinary immunology, 2nd ed., p. 336-342.
W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 56.
|
Waner, T.,
S. Harrus,
D. J. Weiss,
H. Bark, and A. Keysary.
1995.
Demonstration of serum antiplatelet antibodies in experimental acute canine ehrlichiosis.
Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.
48:177-182[Medline].
|
| 57.
|
Waner, T.,
S. Harrus,
H. Bark,
E. Bogin,
Y. Avidar, and A. Keysary.
1997.
Characterization of the subclinical phase of canine ehrlichiosis in experimentally infected beagle dogs.
Vet. Parasitol.
69:307-317[Medline].
|
| 58.
|
Weisiger, R. M.,
M. Ristic, and D. L. Huxsoll.
1975.
Kinetics of antibody response to Ehrlichia canis assayed by the indirect fluorescent antibody method.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
36:689-694[Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Willadsen, P.,
G. A. Riding,
R. V. Mckenna,
D. H. Kemp,
R. L. Tellam,
J. N. Nielsen,
J. Lahstein,
G. S. Cobon, and J. M. Gough.
1989.
Immunological control of a parasitic arthropod: identification of a protective antigen from Boophilus microplus.
J. Immunol.
143:1346-1351[Abstract].
|
| 60.
|
Wong, S. J., and J. A. Thomas.
1998.
Cytoplasmic, nuclear, and platelet autoantibodies in human granulocytic ehrlichiosis patients.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:1959-1963[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61.
|
Woody, B. J., and J. D. Hoskins.
1991.
Ehrlichial diseases of dogs.
Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract.
21:75-98[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 1999, p. 2745-2749, Vol. 37, No. 9
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Chen, H.-W., Zhang, Z., Huber, E., Chao, C.-C., Wang, H., Dasch, G. A., Ching, W.-M.
(2009). Identification of Cross-Reactive Epitopes on the Conserved 47-Kilodalton Antigen of Orientia tsutsugamushi and Human Serine Protease. Infect. Immun.
77: 2311-2319
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sasanelli, M., Paradies, P., Lubas, G., Otranto, D., de Caprariis, D.
(2009). Atypical clinical presentation of coinfection with Ehrlichia, Babesia and Hepatozoon species in a dog. Vet Rec.
164: 22-23
[Full Text]
-
Schaefer, J. J., Needham, G. R., Bremer, W. G., Rikihisa, Y., Ewing, S. A., Stich, R. W.
(2007). Tick Acquisition of Ehrlichia canis from Dogs Treated with Doxycycline Hyclate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 3394-3396
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mylonakis, M. E., Koutinas, A. F., Breitschwerdt, E. B., Hegarty, B. C., Billinis, C. D., Leontides, L. S., Kontos, V. S.
(2004). Chronic Canine Ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis): A Retrospective Study of 19 Natural Cases. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association
40: 174-184
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Felek, S., Huang, H., Rikihisa, Y.
(2003). Sequence and Expression Analysis of virB9 of the Type IV Secretion System of Ehrlichia canis Strains in Ticks, Dogs, and Cultured Cells. Infect. Immun.
71: 6063-6067
[Abstract]
[Full Text]