This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roelofsen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Degener, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roelofsen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Degener, J. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 1999, p. 3041-3043, Vol. 37, No. 9
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of the Effects of Storage in Two Different Swab Fabrics and under Three Different Transport Conditions on Recovery of Aerobic and Anaerobic Bacteria

E. Roelofsen,1,* M. van Leeuwen,1 G. J. Meijer-Severs,1 M. H. F. Wilkinson,2 and J. E. Degener1

Laboratory for Medical Microbiology1 and Centre for High Performance Computing,2 Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Received 15 March 1999/Returned for modification 21 April 1999/Accepted 8 June 1999

Recovery of six anaerobic and five aerobic pathogens from viscose swabs and polyurethane swabs (Culturette EZ) was evaluated quantitatively, and transport in aerobic dry tubes, aerobic Amies transport medium (Transwab), and anaerobic universal transport medium (Port-a-Cul) was compared. The Culturette EZ in aerobic dry tubes gave the highest recovery levels. Data obtained with clinical specimens confirmed these results.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 50 3633510. Fax: 31 50 3633528. E-mail: E.Roelofsen{at}med.rug.nl.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 1999, p. 3041-3043, Vol. 37, No. 9
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Stoner, K. A., Rabe, L. K., Austin, M. N., Meyn, L. A., Hillier, S. L. (2008). Quantitative Survival of Aerobic and Anaerobic Microorganisms in Port-A-Cul and Copan Transport Systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2739-2744 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lee, J., Broughton, R. M., Akdag, A., Worley, S.D., Huang, T.-S. (2007). Antimicrobial Fibers Created via Polycarboxylic Acid Durable Press Finishing. Textile Research Journal 77: 604-611 [Abstract]  
  • Osterblad, M., Jarvinen, H., Lonnqvist, K., Huikko, S., Laippala, P., Viljanto, J., Arvilommi, H., Huovinen, P. (2003). Evaluation of a New Cellulose Sponge-Tipped Swab for Microbiological Sampling: a Laboratory and Clinical Investigation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 1894-1900 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Farhat, S. E., Thibault, M., Devlin, R. (2001). Efficacy of a Swab Transport System in Maintaining Viability of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 2958-2960 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hindiyeh, M., Acevedo, V., Carroll, K. C. (2001). Comparison of Three Transport Systems (Starplex StarSwab II, the New Copan Vi-Pak Amies Agar Gel Collection and Transport Swabs, and BBL Port-A-Cul) for Maintenance of Anaerobic and Fastidious Aerobic Organisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 377-380 [Abstract] [Full Text]