This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Willey, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Willey, B. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2000, p. 3652-3655, Vol. 38, No. 10
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of D-Xylose and 1% Methyl-alpha -D-Glucopyranoside Fermentation Tests for Distinguishing Enterococcus gallinarum from Enterococcus faecium

D. K. Chen, L. Pearce, A. McGeer, D. E. Low, and B. M. Willey*

Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Received 17 April 2000/Returned for modification 29 May 2000/Accepted 21 July 2000

To determine the validity of the rapid xylose and methyl-alpha -D-glucopyranoside (MDG) fermentation tests in distinguishing Enterococcus gallinarum from Enterococcus faecium, 156 well-characterized clinical isolates of enterococci (55 E. gallinarum, 91 E. faecium, and 10 Enterococcus faecalis isolates) known to be of different clones were examined in a blinded fashion. Species identification was confirmed by PCR of the ddl ligase genes of E. faecium and E. faecalis and the vanC1 gene of E. gallinarum. Xylose tests were performed with D-xylose tablets by using a heavy bacterial suspension and were interpreted after 2 h of incubation. Standard MDG fermentation tests were read after 24 h of incubation. The xylose fermentation test had a sensitivity of 98% (54 of 55) and a specificity of 99% (100 of 101) in distinguishing E. gallinarum from E. faecium and E. faecalis. The standard MDG test had a sensitivity of 100% (55 of 55) and a specificity of 95% (96 of 101) after 24 h. The xylose fermentation test is a simple method, easily incorporated into laboratory protocols, that distinguishes E. gallinarum from E. faecium with high sensitivity and specificity in 2 h. The standard MDG test has high sensitivity and can be useful in ruling out the presence of E. gallinarum but requires overnight incubation.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, Rm. 1460, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5. Phone: (416) 586-3121. Fax: (416) 586-3140. E-mail: bwilley{at}mtsinai.on.ca.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2000, p. 3652-3655, Vol. 38, No. 10
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Miller, M. B., Allen, S. L., Mangum, M. E., Doutova, A., Gilligan, P. H. (2004). Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus in Prenatal Screening Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 855-857 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Katz, K. C., McGeer, A., Low, D. E., Willey, B. M. (2002). Laboratory Contamination of Specimens with Quality Control Strains of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in Ontario. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2686-2688 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lu, H.-Z., Weng, X.-H., Li, H., Yin, Y.-K., Pang, M.-Y., Tang, Y.-W. (2002). Enterococcus faecium-Related Outbreak with Molecular Evidence of Transmission from Pigs to Humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 913-917 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Angeletti, S., Lorino, G., Gherardi, G., Battistoni, F., De Cesaris, M., Dicuonzo, G. (2001). Routine Molecular Identification of Enterococci by Gene-Specific PCR and 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 794-797 [Abstract] [Full Text]