This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams-Bouyer, N.
Right arrow Articles by Woods, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams-Bouyer, N.
Right arrow Articles by Woods, G. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2000, p. 4167-4170, Vol. 38, No. 11
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of the BACTEC MGIT 960 and ESP Culture System II for Growth and Detection of Mycobacteria

Natalie Williams-Bouyer,* Rebecca Yorke, Hung I. Lee, and Gail L. Woods

Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-0740

Received 23 June 2000/Returned for modification 27 July 2000/Accepted 22 August 2000

The performances of two continuously monitoring mycobacterial culture systems---ESP Culture System II (ESP II; Trek Diagnostics, Inc., Westlake, Ohio) and BACTEC MGIT 960 (BD Biosciences, Sparks, Md.)---were compared. In addition to both liquid media, all specimens were plated onto Middlebrook 7H11/7H11 selective agar. A total of 3,151 specimens of all types (56.3% were respiratory specimens) were cultured; 231 (7.3%) yielded mycobacteria. The most common species recovered were Mycobacterium avium complex (69 isolates) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC; 65 isolates). The recovery rates for ESP II, BACTEC MGIT 960, and Middlebrook agar, respectively, were 71.2, 63.9, and 61.8% for all mycobacteria; 70.2, 72.6, and 66.3% for all mycobacteria except Mycobacterium gordonae; and 73.8, 84.6, and 87.7% for MTBC. For liquid plus solid medium combinations, recovery rates for all mycobacteria and for MTBC, respectively, were 84.1 and 92.3% for ESP II plus Middlebrook agar and 81.5 and 98.5% for BACTEC MGIT 960 plus Middlebrook agar. The differences in recovery of all mycobacteria by ESP II and by BACTEC MGIT 960 were not significant; for the individual species, the only significant difference was recovery of more isolates of M. gordonae by ESP II. For those isolates recovered in both automated systems, mean times to detection of all mycobacteria and MTBC, respectively, were 15.8 and 17.4 days for ESP II and 12.5 and 11.9 days for BACTEC MGIT 960 (P < 0.05). False-positive signals occurred with 23 (0.7%) BACTEC MGIT 960 cultures and 84 (2.7%) ESP II cultures (P < 0.01). Overall contamination rates were 17.1% for BACTEC MGIT 960, 18.9% for ESP II, and 11.0% for Middlebrook agar. In summary, the ESP II and BACTEC MGIT 960 systems performed comparably with regard to growth and detection of mycobacteria, and the contamination rates were similar. However, with ESP II, times to detection of all mycobacteria and of MTBC were significantly longer, the recovery rate of M. gordonae was significantly higher, and the number of false-positive signals was greater than with BACTEC MGIT 960.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0740. Phone: (409) 772-4851. Fax: (409) 772-5683. E-mail: nmwillia{at}utmb.edu.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2000, p. 4167-4170, Vol. 38, No. 11
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Shin, S. J., Anklam, K., Manning, E. J. B., Collins, M. T. (2009). Rapid Mycobacterial Liquid Culture-Screening Method for Mycobacterium avium Complex Based on Secreted Antigen-Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. CVI 16: 613-620 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Alinovi, C. A., Wu, C. C., Lin, T. L. (2009). In utero Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection of a pygmy goat. Vet Rec. 164: 276-277 [Full Text]  
  • Hall, L., Otter, J. A., Chewins, J., Wengenack, N. L. (2007). Use of Hydrogen Peroxide Vapor for Deactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a Biological Safety Cabinet and a Room. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 810-815 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rajeev, S., Shulaw, W., Berghaus, R., Zhang, Y., Byrum, B. (2006). A testing scheme for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratuberculosis in bovine feces utilizing the ESP Para-JEM liquid culture system. jvdi 18: 529-535 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Musa, H. R., Ambroggi, M., Souto, A., Angeby, K. A. K. (2005). Drug Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a Nitrate Reductase Assay Applied Directly on Microscopy-Positive Sputum Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 3159-3161 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cruciani, M., Scarparo, C., Malena, M., Bosco, O., Serpelloni, G., Mengoli, C. (2004). Meta-Analysis of BACTEC MGIT 960 and BACTEC 460 TB, with or without Solid Media, for Detection of Mycobacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 2321-2325 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Miller, N., Cleary, T., Kraus, G., Young, A. K., Spruill, G., Hnatyszyn, H. J. (2002). Rapid and Specific Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Acid-Fast Bacillus Smear-Positive Respiratory Specimens and BacT/ALERT MP Culture Bottles by Using Fluorogenic Probes and Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 4143-4147 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Romano, L., Sanguinetti, M., Posteraro, B., Ardito, F., Gesu, G., Schito, A. M., Fadda, G. (2002). Early Detection of Negative BACTEC MGIT 960 Cultures by PCR-Reverse Cross-Blot Hybridization Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3499-3501 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»