This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, L.
Right arrow Articles by Agnello, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cook, L.
Right arrow Articles by Agnello, V.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2000, p. 4326-4331, Vol. 38, No. 12
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Use of Whole Blood Specimens for Routine Clinical Quantitation of Hepatitis C Virus RNA Does Not Increase Assay Sensitivity

Linda Cook,dagger Angela M. Ross, Glenn B. Knight, and Vincent Agnello*

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts 01805

Received 29 March 2000/Returned for modification 11 August 2000/Accepted 27 September 2000

The measurement of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels in the blood has, in the last few years, become a critical component in the therapy of patients with HCV infections. Initially, extraction methods for serum and plasma were used, but a newer method that uses Catrimox-14 as the extraction agent for whole blood has been reported. Because the whole blood extraction method may yield higher virus levels if significant levels of virus are present in the white blood cells (WBC), the method was evaluated for use in our clinical diagnostic laboratory despite its higher reagent costs and more time-consuming methodology. RNA was simultaneously extracted from 39 clinical samples by four different methods: Catrimox-14-Trizol extraction from whole blood, Trizol extraction from whole blood, Trizol extraction from serum, and a commercial serum extraction method, the EZNA total RNA kit. In addition, in an effort to quantitate the amount of HCV RNA virus in the WBC, Trizol extraction from isolated WBC was also performed. Quantitative results for samples from which RNA was extracted by all four methods were essentially the same; the Catrimox-14-Trizol method did not yield increased virus levels. Insignificant levels of virus were found in the WBC. The results did not demonstrate a clinical usefulness for the Catrimox-14-Trizol method.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, 41 Mall Rd., Burlington, MA 01805. Phone: (781) 744-8887. Fax: (781) 744-5208. E-mail: Vincent.Agnello{at}Lahey.org.

dagger Present address: 4 Rocky Ledge La., Billerica, MA 01821.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2000, p. 4326-4331, Vol. 38, No. 12
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Bruns, T., Steinmetzer, K., Ermantraut, E., Stallmach, A. (2009). Hepatitis C Virus RNA Quantitation in Venous and Capillary Small-Volume Whole-Blood Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3231-3240 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Daniel, H. D. J., David, J., Grant, P. R., Garson, J. A., Chandy, G. M., Abraham, P. (2008). Whole Blood as an Alternative to Plasma for Detection of Hepatitis C Virus RNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 3791-3794 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Forman, M. S., Valsamakis, A. (2004). Increased Sensitivity of the Roche COBAS AMPLICOR HCV Test, Version 2.0, Using Modified Extraction Techniques. J. Mol. Diagn. 6: 225-230 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Schmidt, W., Stapleton, J. T., Knight, G. B., Agnello, V. (2001). Whole-Blood Hepatitis C Virus RNA Extraction Methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 3812-3813 [Full Text]