This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz, P.
Right arrow Articles by Casal, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz, P.
Right arrow Articles by Casal, M. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2000, p. 4663-4664, Vol. 38, No. 12
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Using the ESP Culture System II with That Using the BACTEC Method

P. Ruiz, F. J. Zerolo, and M. J. Casal*

Mycobacteria Reference Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cordoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain

Received 5 April 2000/Returned for modification 29 May 2000/Accepted 7 October 2000

The ESP Culture System II was evaluated for its capacity to test the susceptibility of 389 cultures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to streptomycin, rifampin, ethambutol, and isoniazid. Good agreement with results with the BACTEC TB 460 was found. ESP II is a reliable, rapid, and automated method for performing susceptibility testing.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Mycobacteria Reference Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cordoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain. Phone: 34-957-218284. Fax: 34-957-218229. E-mail: mi3relur{at}lucano.uco.es.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2000, p. 4663-4664, Vol. 38, No. 12
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Garrigo, M., Aragon, L. M., Alcaide, F., Borrell, S., Cardenosa, E., Galan, J. J., Gonzalez-Martin, J., Martin-Casabona, N., Moreno, C., Salvado, M., Coll, P. (2007). Multicenter Laboratory Evaluation of the MB/BacT Mycobacterium Detection System and the BACTEC MGIT 960 System in Comparison with the BACTEC 460TB System for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 1766-1770 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Piersimoni, C., Olivieri, A., Benacchio, L., Scarparo, C. (2006). Current Perspectives on Drug Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex: the Automated Nonradiometric Systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 20-28 [Full Text]  
  • Palomino, J. C. (2005). Nonconventional and new methods in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: feasibility and applicability in the field. Eur Respir J 26: 339-350 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Scarparo, C., Ricordi, P., Ruggiero, G., Piccoli, P. (2004). Evaluation of the Fully Automated BACTEC MGIT 960 System for Testing Susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to Pyrazinamide, Streptomycin, Isoniazid, Rifampin, and Ethambutol and Comparison with the Radiometric BACTEC 460TB Method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1109-1114 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tortoli, E., Benedetti, M., Fontanelli, A., Simonetti, M. T. (2002). Evaluation of Automated BACTEC MGIT 960 System for Testing Susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to Four Major Antituberculous Drugs: Comparison with the Radiometric BACTEC 460TB Method and the Agar Plate Method of Proportion. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 607-610 [Abstract] [Full Text]