Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2000, p. 1131-1135, Vol. 38, No. 3
Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and
Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of
Ghent, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium,1 and
Delft Diagnostic Laboratory, 2600 GA Delft, The
Netherlands2
Received 19 July 1999/Returned for modification 31 August
1999/Accepted 10 December 1999
Recently, a new 16S ribosomal DNA-based PCR assay was developed for
the specific detection of "Candidatus Helicobacter
suis" (former "Gastrospirillum suis") in porcine
gastric samples. In the present study, this PCR assay was compared to
three other invasive diagnostic methods (rapid urease test,
immunohistochemistry, histologic analysis by Giemsa staining). Antral
stomach samples from 200 slaughterhouse pigs from Belgium and The
Netherlands were examined. Bacterial presence was determined in 77%
(154 of 200) of the samples by PCR in combination with Southern blot
hybridization, 56% (111 of 200) of the samples by
immunohistochemistry, 61% (122 of 200) of the samples by urease
testing (20 h postinoculation [p.i.]), 36% (71 of 200) of the
samples by urease testing (3 h p.i.), and 33% (65 of 200) of the
samples by Giemsa staining. The intrinsic specificity of the PCR assay
was assessed by Southern blot analysis with an
"Candidatus H. suis"-specific probe and sequencing of
PCR products. Interassay sensitivity and specificity values were
assessed for each test by pairwise comparisons between tests. Agreement
between tests was evaluated by calculating Cohen's kappa coefficient.
From that analysis, the PCR assay was considered the most reliable
benchmark. Microscopic detection of immunohistochemically labeled or
Giemsa-stained "Candidatus H. suis" cells in stomach sections proved to be highly specific (100%) but relatively
insensitive (72 and 42%, respectively) compared to the PCR assay. A
longer incubation time of the urease test improved its sensitivity
considerably (74 versus 55%) but was accompanied by a loss of
specificity (72 versus 93%). In conclusion, we found the
"Candidatus H. suis"-specific PCR assay to be a
sensitive and reliable diagnostic method for the detection of
"Candidatus H. suis" in the stomachs of pigs and could
prove to be a valuable tool for further epidemiological studies both
for "Candidatus H. suis"- and for "Helicobacter
heilmannii" type 1-related research.
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Detection of "Candidatus Helicobacter suis" in
Gastric Samples of Pigs by PCR: Comparison with Other Invasive
Diagnostic Techniques
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dept. of
Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary
Medicine, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium. Phone: 32 9 264 77 45. Fax: 32 9 264 77 89. E-mail:
dominic.degroote{at}rug.ac.be.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»