This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morré, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by van den Brule, A. J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morré, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by van den Brule, A. J. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1679-1680, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Pooling of Urine Specimens for Detection of Asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis Infections by PCR in a Low-Prevalence Population: Cost-Saving Strategy for Epidemiological Studies and Screening Programs

Servaas A. Morré,1 Chris J. L. M. Meijer,1 Christian Munk,2 Susanne Krüger-Kjaer,2 Jeanette F. Winther,2 Hans O. Jørgensens,3 and Adriaan J. C. van den Brule1,*

Department of Pathology, Section of Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,1 and Danish Cancer Society, Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Copenhagen,2 and Defence Medical Training Center, Gentofte,3 Denmark

Received 18 November 1999/Returned for modification 8 January 2000/Accepted 29 January 2000

Pooling, in groups of five, of urine specimens from asymptomatically infected men in a population with 4% prevalence, as determined by case finding, is 100% sensitive and specific and results in a 60.5% reduction in the number of tests needed. Pooling of urine specimens in groups of 10 for the estimation of population-based prevalence is 96.1% sensitive and 100% specific and saves 90% of the test costs.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathology, Section of Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-20-4440503 or 44023. Fax: 31-20-4442964. E-mail: vandenbrule{at}azvu.nl.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1679-1680, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mahilum-Tapay, L., Laitila, V., Wawrzyniak, J. J, Lee, H. H, Alexander, S., Ison, C., Swain, A., Barber, P., Ushiro-Lumb, I., Goh, B. T (2007). New point of care Chlamydia Rapid Test bridging the gap between diagnosis and treatment: performance evaluation study. BMJ 335: 1190-1194 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Whiley, D. M., Tapsall, J. W., Sloots, T. P. (2006). Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: An Ongoing Challenge. J. Mol. Diagn. 8: 3-15 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lindan, C., Mathur, M., Kumta, S., Jerajani, H., Gogate, A., Schachter, J., Moncada, J. (2005). Utility of Pooled Urine Specimens for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Men Attending Public Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinics in Mumbai, India, by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 1674-1677 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • van Bergen, J, Gotz, H M, Richardus, J H, Hoebe, C J P A, Broer, J, Coenen, A J T, for the PILOT CT study group, (2005). Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands. Sex. Transm. Infect. 81: 17-23 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Currie, M. J., McNiven, M., Yee, T., Schiemer, U., Bowden, F. J. (2004). Pooling of Clinical Specimens Prior to Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR Is Accurate and Cost Saving. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 4866-4867 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Melese, M., Chidambaram, J. D., Alemayehu, W., Lee, D. C., Yi, E. H., Cevallos, V., Zhou, Z., Donnellan, C., Saidel, M., Whitcher, J. P., Gaynor, B. D., Lietman, T. M. (2004). Feasibility of Eliminating Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis With Repeat Mass Antibiotic Treatments. JAMA 292: 721-725 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Klavs, I, Rodrigues, L C, Wellings, K, Kese, D, Hayes, R (2004). Prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the general population of Slovenia: serious gaps in control. Sex. Transm. Infect. 80: 121-123 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kissin, D M, Holman, S, Minkoff, H L, DeMeo, L, McCormack, W M, DeHovitz, J A (2002). Epidemiology and natural history of ligase chain reaction detected chlamydial and gonococcal infections. Sex. Transm. Infect. 78: 208-209 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Morre, S A, Welte, R, Postma, M J (2002). Major improvements in cost effectiveness of screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis using pooled urine specimens and high performance testing. Sex. Transm. Infect. 78: 74-75 [Full Text]  
  • Gomes, J P, Ferreira, M A, de Sa, A B., Catry, M A (2001). Pooling urine samples for PCR screening of C trachomatis urogenital infection in women. Sex. Transm. Infect. 77 : 76-77 [Full Text]  
  • Drancourt, M., Bollet, C., Carlioz, A., Martelin, R., Gayral, J.-P., Raoult, D. (2000). 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis of a Large Collection of Environmental and Clinical Unidentifiable Bacterial Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 3623-3630 [Abstract] [Full Text]