This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liebana, E.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liebana, E.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, R. H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3609-3616, Vol. 39, No. 10
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3609-3616.2001

Molecular Typing of Salmonella Serotypes Prevalent in Animals in England: Assessment of Methodology

Ernesto Liebana,1,* Daniel Guns,1,2 Lourdes Garcia-Migura,1 Martin J. Woodward,1 Felicity A. Clifton-Hadley,1 and Robert H. Davies1

Department of Bacterial Diseases, Veterinary Laboratories Agency-Weybridge, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB,1 and Faculty of Science, School of Life Science, Kingston University, Kingston on Thames KT1 2EE,2 United Kingdom

Received 21 March 2001/Returned for modification 1 July 2001/Accepted 23 July 2001

Salmonella enterica serotypes Derby, Mbandaka, Montevideo, Livingstone, and Senftenberg were among the 10 most prevalent serotypes isolated from farm animals in England and Wales in 1999. These serotypes are of potential zoonotic relevance; however, there is currently no "gold standard" fingerprinting method for them. A collection of isolates representing the former serotypes and serotype Gold Coast were analyzed using plasmid profiling, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and ribotyping. The success of the molecular methods in identifying DNA polymorphisms was different for each serotype. Plasmid profiling was particularly useful for serotype Derby isolates, and it also provided a good level of discrimination for serotype Senftenberg. For most serotypes, we observed a number of nontypeable plasmid-free strains, which represents a limitation of this technique. Fingerprinting of genomic DNA by ribotyping and PFGE produced a significant variation in results, depending on the serotype of the strain. Both PstI/SphI ribotyping and XbaI-PFGE provided a similar degree of strain differentiation for serotype Derby and serotype Senftenberg, only marginally lower than that achieved by plasmid profiling. Ribotyping was less sensitive than PFGE when applied to serotype Mbandaka or serotype Montevideo. Serotype Gold Coast isolates were found to be nontypeable by XbaI-PFGE, and a significant proportion of them were found to be plasmid free. A similar situation applies to a number of serotype Livingstone isolates which were nontypeable by plasmid profiling and/or PFGE. In summary, the serotype of the isolates has a considerable influence in deciding the best typing strategy; a single method cannot be relied upon for discriminating between strains, and a combination of typing methods allows further discrimination.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Veterinary Laboratories Agency-Weybridge, Department of Bacterial Diseases, Woodham Ln., Addlestone, KT15 3NB Surrey, England, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 1932 357587. Fax: 44 1932 357595. E-mail: E.liebana{at}VLA.DEFRA.gsi.gov.UK.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3609-3616, Vol. 39, No. 10
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3609-3616.2001



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Aktan, I., La Ragione, R. M., Pritchard, G. C., Woodward, M. J. (2007). Prevalence of attaching and effacing Escherichia coli serogroup O103 in orphan lambs on an open farm in eastern England. Vet Rec. 161: 386-387 [Full Text]  
  • Gaul, S. B., Wedel, S., Erdman, M. M., Harris, D. L., Harris, I. T., Ferris, K. E., Hoffman, L. (2007). Use of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis of Conserved XbaI Fragments for Identification of Swine Salmonella Serotypes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 472-476 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bouallegue-Godet, O., Salem, Y. B., Fabre, L., Demartin, M., Grimont, P. A. D., Mzoughi, R., Weill, F.-X. (2005). Nosocomial Outbreak Caused by Salmonella enterica Serotype Livingstone Producing CTX-M-27 Extended-Spectrum {beta}-Lactamase in a Neonatal Unit in Sousse, Tunisia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 1037-1044 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nesse, L. L., Nordby, K., Heir, E., Bergsjoe, B., Vardund, T., Nygaard, H., Holstad, G. (2003). Molecular Analyses of Salmonellaenterica Isolates from Fish Feed Factories and Fish Feed Ingredients. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 1075-1081 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Liebana, E., Garcia-Migura, L., Clouting, C., Clifton-Hadley, F. A., Lindsay, E., Threlfall, E. J., McDowell, S. W. J., Davies, R. H. (2002). Multiple Genetic Typing of Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium Isolates of Different Phage Types (DT104, U302, DT204b, and DT49) from Animals and Humans in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 4450-4456 [Abstract] [Full Text]