This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collins, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3772-3774, Vol. 39, No. 10
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3772-3774.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Contamination of the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory with Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci and Multidrug- Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Implications for Hospital and Laboratory Workers

Susan M. Collins,1 Donna M. Hacek,2 Lisa A. Degen,1 Marc O. Wright,1 Gary A. Noskin,1,2,3,4 and Lance R. Peterson1,2,3,*

Department of Pathology, Clinical Microbiology Division,1 Northwestern Prevention Epicenter,2 Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Division,3 and Department of Infection Control and Prevention,4 Northwestern Memorial Hospital and Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611

Received 11 June 2001/Returned for modification 9 July 2001/Accepted 26 July 2001

We surveyed environmental surfaces in our clinical microbiology laboratory to determine the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (MDRE) during a routine working day. From a total of 193 surfaces, VRE were present on 20 (10%) and MDRE were present on 4 (2%) of the surfaces tested. In a subsequent survey after routine cleaning, all of the 24 prior positive surfaces were found to be negative. Thus, those in the laboratory should recognize that many surfaces may be contaminated by resistant organisms during routine processing of patient specimens.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathology, Northwestern Prevention Epicenter, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Galter Carriage House, Rm. 701, 251 E. Huron, Chicago, IL 60611. Phone: (312) 926-3205. Fax: (312) 926-4139. E-mail: lancer{at}northwestern.edu.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3772-3774, Vol. 39, No. 10
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3772-3774.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Katz, K. C., McGeer, A., Low, D. E., Willey, B. M. (2002). Laboratory Contamination of Specimens with Quality Control Strains of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in Ontario. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2686-2688 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»