Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2001, p. 1002-1007, Vol. 39, No. 3
Department of Biochemistry1 and
Department of Microbiology and
Infection,3 Imperial College of Science,
Technology and Medicine, London, and Centre for Tropical
Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John Radcliffe
Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford,7
United Kingdom, and Wellcome Trust Clinical Research
Unit2 and Centre for Tropical
Diseases,5 Cho Quan Hospital, and
Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine,
University of Medicine and Pharmacy,6 Ho Chi
Minh City, and Dong Thap Provincial Hospital, Cao Lanh,
Dong Thap Province,4 Vietnam
Received 28 August 2000/Returned for modification 27 October
2000/Accepted 11 December 2000
Currently, the laboratory diagnosis of typhoid fever is dependent
upon either the isolation of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Typhi from a clinical sample or the
detection of raised titers of agglutinating serum antibodies against
the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (O) or flagellum (H) antigens of serotype Typhi (the Widal test). In this study, the serum antibody responses to
the LPS and flagellum antigens of serotype Typhi were investigated with
individuals from a region of Vietnam in which typhoid is endemic, and
their usefulness for the diagnosis of typhoid fever was evaluated. The
antibody responses to both antigens were highly variable among
individuals infected with serotype Typhi, and elevated antibody titers
were also detected in a high proportion of serum samples from healthy
subjects from the community. In-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assays (ELISAs) for the detection of specific classes of anti-LPS and
antiflagellum antibodies were compared with other serologically based
tests for the diagnosis of typhoid fever (Widal TO and TH,
anti-serotype Typhi immunoglobulin M [IgM] dipstick, and IDeaL
TUBEX). At a specificity of
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.1002-1007.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Serology of Typhoid Fever in an Area of Endemicity
and Its Relevance to Diagnosis
0.93, the sensitivities of the different
tests were 0.75, 0.55, and 0.52 for the anti-LPS IgM, IgG, and IgA
ELISAs, respectively; 0.28 for the antiflagellum IgG ELISA; 0.47 and
0.32 for the Widal TO and TH tests, respectively; and 0.77 for the
anti-serotype Typhi IgM dipstick assay. The specificity of the IDeaL
TUBEX was below 0.90 (sensitivity, 0.87; specificity, 0.76). The
serological assays based on the detection of IgM antibodies against
either serotype Typhi LPS (ELISA) or whole bacteria (dipstick) had a
significantly higher sensitivity than the Widal TO test when used with
a single acute-phase serum sample (P
0.007). These
tests could be of use for the diagnosis of typhoid fever in patients who have clinical typhoid fever but are culture negative or
in regions where bacterial culturing facilities are not available.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biochemistry, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine,
Exhibition Rd., South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Phone: 020 7594 5254. Fax: 020 7594 5255. E-mail:
d.house{at}ic.ac.uk.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»