This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caliendo, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Erice, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caliendo, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Erice, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2001, p. 1334-1338, Vol. 39, No. 4
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1334-1338.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative PCR Assays for Cytomegalovirus DNA in Plasma

Angela M. Caliendo,1,* Rob Schuurman,2 Belinda Yen-Lieberman,3 Stephen A. Spector,4 Janet Andersen,5 R. Manjiry,2 Clyde Crumpacker,6 Nell S. Lurain,7 and Alejo Erice8 for the Cmv Working Group of the Complications of Hiv Disease Rac, Aids Clinical Trials Group

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia1; Department of Virology, Eykman Winkler Institute for Clinical Microbiology, Utrecht University Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands2; Department of Clinical Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio3; Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California4; Department of Immunology/Microbiology, Statistics and Data Analysis Center, Harvard School of Public Health,5 and Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School,6 Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Immunology/Microbiology, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois7; and Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota8

Received 11 August 2000/Returned for modification 13 December 2000/Accepted 22 January 2001

We analyzed the performance characteristics of the qualitative AMPLICOR CMV Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, Calif.) and quantitative COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR Test (Roche Molecular Systems) assays and compared the performance of the AMPLICOR quantitative assay with an in-house-developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA PCR assay. The quantitative AMPLICOR assay was found to be more sensitive than the qualitative AMPLICOR assay. The quantitative AMPLICOR assay has a lower limit of sensitivity of 400 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma and is linear to 50,000 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma. Compared to the in-house PCR assay, the AMPLICOR quantitative assay gave lower viral load values at all concentrations tested, but the difference between the two assays was not consistent across the entire dynamic range of the AMPLICOR quantitative assay. At the lower end of the assay, the viral load values obtained with the in-house PCR assay were three- to fivefold (0.5 to 0.7 log units) higher than those measured with the AMPLICOR assay. At higher input concentrations, the differences between the two assays approached 10-fold. This direct comparison of the in-house assay and the quantitative AMPLICOR assay provides the ability to compare previously published in-house data with an assay widely available for future research and clinical monitoring of patients with CMV infections.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Emory University Hospital, Clinical Laboratory, F147, 1364 Clifton Rd., NE, Atlanta, GA 30322. Phone: (404) 712-5721. Fax: (404) 712-4632. E-mail: acalien{at}emory.edu.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2001, p. 1334-1338, Vol. 39, No. 4
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1334-1338.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wolff, D. J., Heaney, D. L., Neuwald, P. D., Stellrecht, K. A., Press, R. D. (2009). Multi-Site PCR-Based CMV Viral Load Assessment-Assays Demonstrate Linearity and Precision, but Lack Numeric Standardization: A Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology. J. Mol. Diagn. 11: 87-92 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Leland, D. S., Ginocchio, C. C. (2007). Role of Cell Culture for Virus Detection in the Age of Technology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20: 49-78 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Procop, G. W. (2006). Evaluation of Molecular Diagnostic Assays for Fungal Infections. J. Mol. Diagn. 8: 297-298 [Full Text]  
  • Herrmann, B., Cavaglia Larsson, V., Rubin, C.-J., Sund, F., Eriksson, B.-M., Arvidson, J., Yun, Z., Bondeson, K., Blomberg, J. (2004). Comparison of a Duplex Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay and the COBAS Amplicor CMV Monitor Test for Detection of Cytomegalovirus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1909-1914 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hong, K. M., Najjar, H., Hawley, M., Press, R. D. (2004). Quantitative Real-Time PCR with Automated Sample Preparation for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Bone Marrow Transplant Patients. Clin. Chem. 50: 846-856 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ikewaki, J., Ohtsuka, E., Kawano, R., Ogata, M., Kikuchi, H., Nasu, M. (2003). Real-Time PCR Assay Compared to Nested PCR and Antigenemia Assays for Detecting Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma Patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4382-4387 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Caliendo, A. M., Yen-Lieberman, B., Baptista, J., Andersen, J., Crumpacker, C., Schuurman, R., Spector, S. A., Bremer, J., Lurain, N. S. (2003). Comparison of Molecular Tests for Detection and Quantification of Cell-Associated Cytomegalovirus DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3509-3513 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hadaya, K., Wunderli, W., Deffernez, C., Martin, P.-Y., Mentha, G., Binet, I., Perrin, L., Kaiser, L. (2003). Monitoring of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients by an Ultrasensitive Plasma PCR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3757-3764 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mengelle, C., Sandres-Saune, K., Pasquier, C., Rostaing, L., Mansuy, J.-M., Marty, M., Da Silva, I., Attal, M., Massip, P., Izopet, J. (2003). Automated Extraction and Quantification of Human Cytomegalovirus DNA in Whole Blood by Real-Time PCR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3840-3845 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Li, H., Dummer, J. S., Estes, W. R., Meng, S., Wright, P. F., Tang, Y.-W. (2003). Measurement of Human Cytomegalovirus Loads by Quantitative Real-Time PCR for Monitoring Clinical Intervention in Transplant Recipients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 187-191 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Boom, R., Sol, C. J. A., Schuurman, T., van Breda, A., Weel, J. F. L., Beld, M., ten Berge, I. J. M., Wertheim-van Dillen, P. M. E, de Jong, M. D. (2002). Human Cytomegalovirus DNA in Plasma and Serum Specimens of Renal Transplant Recipients Is Highly Fragmented. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 4105-4113 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Schennach, H., Murr, C., Larcher, C., Streif, W., Pastner, E., Zaknun, D., Schonitzer, D., Fuchs, D. (2002). Neopterin Concentrations in Cord Blood: A Single-Cohort Study of Paired Samples from 541 Pregnant Women and Their Newborns. Clin. Chem. 48: 2059-2061 [Full Text]  
  • Fiebelkorn, K. R., Lee, B. G., Hill, C. E., Caliendo, A. M., Nolte, F. S. (2002). Clinical Evaluation of an Automated Nucleic Acid Isolation System. Clin. Chem. 48: 1613-1615 [Full Text]  
  • von Muller, L., Hampl, W., Hinz, J., Meisel, H., Reip, A., Engelmann, E., Heilbronn, R., Gartner, B., Kramer, O., Einsele, H., Hebart, H., Ljubicic, T., Loffler, J., Mertens, T. (2002). High Variability between Results of Different In-House Tests for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Monitoring and a Standardized Quantitative Plasma CMV PCR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2285-2287 [Abstract] [Full Text]