Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2453-2457, Vol. 39, No. 7
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2453-2457.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of Variable Number Tandem Repeat and
IS6110-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism
Analyses for Discrimination of High- and Low-Copy-Number IS6110
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates
Rachael E. L.
Barlow,1
Deborah M.
Gascoyne-Binzi,1,2,*
Stephen H.
Gillespie,3
Anne
Dickens,3
Shabnam
Qamer,1 and
Peter M.
Hawkey1,2
The Division of Microbiology, School of
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2
9JT,1 Department of Microbiology, The
General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX,2 and
Department of Medical Microbiology,
Royal Free & University College Medical School, University College
London, Royal Free Campus, London NW3 2PE,3
United Kingdom
Received 16 October 2000/Returned for modification 24 January
2001/Accepted 29 April 2001
The present study was designed to evaluate the use of variable
number tandem repeat (VNTR) and IS6110-restriction
fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analyses in combination as a
two-step strategy for discrimination (as measured by the Hunter-Gaston Discrimination Index [HGDI]) of both high- and low-copy-number IS6110 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates compared to
IS6110-RFLP alone with an unselected collection of
isolates. Individually, IS6110-RFLP fingerprinting
produced six clusters that accounted for 69% of the low-copy-number
IS6110 isolates (five clusters) and 5% of the
high-copy-number IS6110 isolates (one cluster). A total
of 39% of all the isolates were clustered (HGDI = 0.97). VNTR
analysis generated a total of 35 different VNTR allele profile sets
from 93 isolates (HGDI = 0.938). Combining
IS6110-RFLP analysis with VNTR analysis reduced the
overall percentage of clustered isolates to 29% (HGDI = 0.988)
and discriminated a further 27% of low-copy-number isolates that would
have been clustered by IS6110-RFLP alone. The use of
VNTR analysis as an initial typing strategy facilitates further
analysis by IS6110-RFLP, and more importantly, VNTR
analysis subdivides some IS6110-RFLP-defined clusters
containing low- and single-copy IS6110 isolates.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: The Division of
Microbiology, Department of Microbiology, The General Infirmary,
Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, United Kingdom. Phone:
(44)-113-2335592. Fax: (44)-113-2335638. E-mail:
deborahg{at}pathology.leeds.ac.uk.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2453-2457, Vol. 39, No. 7
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2453-2457.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Han, H., Wang, F., Xiao, Y., Ren, Y., Chao, Y., Guo, A., Ye, L.
(2007). Utility of mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit typing for differentiating Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Wuhan, China. J Med Microbiol
56: 1219-1223
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gopaul, K. K., Brown, T. J., Gibson, A. L., Yates, M. D., Drobniewski, F. A.
(2006). Progression Toward an Improved DNA Amplification-Based Typing Technique in the Study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Epidemiology.. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 2492-2498
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
van Deutekom, H., Supply, P., de Haas, P. E. W., Willery, E., Hoijng, S. P., Locht, C., Coutinho, R. A., van Soolingen, D.
(2005). Molecular Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit-Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis, a More Accurate Method for Identifying Epidemiological Links between Patients with Tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 4473-4479
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kam, K. M., Yip, C. W., Tse, L. W., Wong, K. L., Lam, T. K., Kremer, K., Au, B. K. Y., van Soolingen, D.
(2005). Utility of Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit Typing for Differentiating Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates of the Beijing Family. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 306-313
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kremer, K., Au, B. K. Y., Yip, P. C. W., Skuce, R., Supply, P., Kam, K. M., van Soolingen, D.
(2005). Use of Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Typing To Differentiate Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing Family Isolates from Hong Kong and Comparison with IS6110 Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Typing and Spoligotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 314-320
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Blackwood, K. S., Wolfe, J. N., Kabani, A. M.
(2004). Application of Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit Typing to Manitoba Tuberculosis Cases: Can Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Be Forgotten?. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 5001-5006
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sun, Y.-J., Lee, A. S. G., Ng, S. T., Ravindran, S., Kremer, K., Bellamy, R., Wong, S.-Y., van Soolingen, D., Supply, P., Paton, N. I.
(2004). Characterization of Ancestral Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Multiple Genetic Markers and Proposal of Genotyping Strategy. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 5058-5064
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hawkey, P. M., Smith, E. G., Evans, J. T., Monk, P., Bryan, G., Mohamed, H. H., Bardhan, M., Pugh, R. N.
(2003). Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Compared to IS6110-Based Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis for Investigation of Apparently Clustered Cases of Tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 3514-3520
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Burgos, M.V., Pym, A.S.
(2002). Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis. Eur Respir J
20: 54S-65s
[Abstract]
[Full Text]